Author Archives: Hall

OK: Exclusion not the remedy for knock-and-announce violation under state constitution either

Exclusion is not the remedy for a knock-and-announce violation, following Hudson under state constitution, too. State v. Velasquez, 2024 OK CR 29, 2024 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 28 (Oct. 24, 2024). Officers had a warrant for defendant’s arrest, and when … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Knock and announce, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OK: Exclusion not the remedy for knock-and-announce violation under state constitution either

CA6: Shooting at officers executing SW justified 6 level USSG increase

Shooting at SWAT officers executing a warrant justified a 6 level Sentencing Guideline enhancement. United States v. Weaver, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 27036 (6th Cir. Oct. 24, 2024). The affidavit for warrant describing two CI’s buys from defendant at his … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: Shooting at officers executing SW justified 6 level USSG increase

S.D.Ill.: Merely possessing a firearm in a high crime area is not RS

The officer putting a gun to defendant’s head while he was in line at a convenience store was an arrest. Just having a gun on you in Illinois is no longer a crime. “But there was no swiftly developing situation … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Merely possessing a firearm in a high crime area is not RS

OR: Def’s wife implicitly consented to the search by her actions

The record supported the finding that defendant’s wife consented to the search. Her behavior, including standing in the open doorway and not protesting the officer’s entry, indicated implied consent. In addition, the court found that he did not expressly deny … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Def’s wife implicitly consented to the search by her actions

NY: Not IAC to not raise a novel knock-and-announce argument

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel argument that defense counsel was deficient in not raising a novel argument about not following SCOTUS’s Hudson knock-and-announce case fails. No reasonable defense lawyer would have seen the need to raise it, and the merits … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY: Not IAC to not raise a novel knock-and-announce argument

WA state exclusionary rule is categorical, and a new crime alone isn’t enough for attenuation

The Washington State constitutional exclusionary rule is categorical and a privacy violation almost always results in exclusion. They had already rejected the good faith exception under state law. Here, it was attenuation, and a new crime alone isn’t enough. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, State constitution | Comments Off on WA state exclusionary rule is categorical, and a new crime alone isn’t enough for attenuation

CA6: Realtime ping information didn’t require a warrant

“Perry first challenges the validity of the search warrants for call and location data from his two cellphones. Law-enforcement officers generally need a warrant to conduct a ‘search’ that intrudes upon a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy. … But a … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Realtime ping information didn’t require a warrant

GA: Car GPS reported to dealer, and officer got SW for the GPS data

Defendant’s car GPS snitched him off to the dealer where the officers got the ping information. “The Cobb detective also discovered that the Camry had a GPS system that pinged its location to the dealership, and she obtained a search … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Pole cameras, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Car GPS reported to dealer, and officer got SW for the GPS data

M.D.Ala.: Officers executing arrest warrant at house could do protective sweep

Officers executing an arrest warrant for murder could conduct a protective sweep. United States v. Moss, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191835 (M.D. Ala. Sep. 9, 2024), adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190695 (M.D.Ala. Oct. 21, 2024). Children’s services “ordering” plaintiff … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Officers executing arrest warrant at house could do protective sweep

LA5: SW support was thin, but def didn’t carry burden to overcome presumption of validity

Here the affidavit had a gratuitous statement that there were federal wiretaps, but they didn’t involve defendant. Still, it made it into the affidavit for warrant along with identification information. There were also observations of him going into suspect premises. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Probable cause, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on LA5: SW support was thin, but def didn’t carry burden to overcome presumption of validity

D.S.D.: Resistance to a frisk can help justify it

Aside from there being a basis for a frisk, defendant’s resistance to it justified it under circuit precedent. United States v. Gatnoor, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191729 (D.S.D. Oct. 18, 2024). “We agree that, on this record, Burks failed to … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Resistance to a frisk can help justify it

D.Mass.: Four-month delay in searching lawfully seized cell phone here not unreasonable

Four month delay in searching cell phones after lawfully seizing them was not unreasonable. “Defendant relies primarily on United States v. Smith, a Second Circuit case. … There, in assessing whether a thirty-one day delay between police seizing a tablet … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Four-month delay in searching lawfully seized cell phone here not unreasonable

W.D.Pa.: Police officer can answer a dropped cell phone without violating 4A; that’s not a search

“Similarly, where an officer is legitimately in possession of a cell phone dropped at the scene of a crime and observes, in plain view, an incoming call arriving on the cell phone, the officer may lawfully answer the incoming call … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Police officer can answer a dropped cell phone without violating 4A; that’s not a search

LA: Judge’s arbitrarily denying or slow walking SW requests violates Canons of Judicial Conduct

A state judge who sat on search warrant requests, didn’t know the definition of probable cause despite having been a former prosecutor and defense lawyer for 15 years, and imposed unnecessary legal requirements on the state to obtain warrants violated … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on LA: Judge’s arbitrarily denying or slow walking SW requests violates Canons of Judicial Conduct

CA10: When PC is shown, nexus to home can be “thin”

“Defendant acknowledges that the affidavit in support of the search warrant ‘establishes probable cause to believe [Defendant] distributed controlled substances’ (and it plainly does), but says ‘the nexus between his drug activity and the apartment is thin.’ Aplt’s Op. Br. … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: When PC is shown, nexus to home can be “thin”

D.N.M. sets protocol for ping warrant applications

Ping warrant applications now have to follow a protocol in D.N.M. In re Search Warrant Application for Location Info., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190215 (D.N.M. Oct. 18, 2024):

Posted in Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.N.M. sets protocol for ping warrant applications

DE: Nexus for SW for car did not extend to def’s house

The nexus in the affidavit for the warrant for defendant’s car did not extend to his house, so there was no probable cause for the house search. (The search is valid, however, from inevitable discovery. “That said, because the State … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Nexus, Waiver | Comments Off on DE: Nexus for SW for car did not extend to def’s house

SD: PC for drugs as to driver extends to passenger’s purse

Once there was probable cause to search a vehicle because of what was on the driver, there was also probable cause to search the purse of his passenger. State v. Edwards, 2024 S.D. 62, 2024 S.D. LEXIS 136 (Oct. 16, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on SD: PC for drugs as to driver extends to passenger’s purse

CA6: Cell phone SW affidavit relying on officer’s experience was sufficient on GFE, even if PC was lacking

Defendant was a suspect in robberies, and when he was arrested, there was a cell phone at his feet. There was no direct link to the cell phone and the robberies. The affidavit relied on the officer’s experience [of course] … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA6: Cell phone SW affidavit relying on officer’s experience was sufficient on GFE, even if PC was lacking

N.D.Cal.: Checking DMV and criminal history during a traffic stop not unreasonable

Checking DMV and criminal history during a traffic stop is not unreasonable. United States v. Daniels, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190101 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2024). Defendant “argues that the bodycam evidence refutes Trooper Myer’s testimony that the truck and … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Informant hearsay, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Checking DMV and criminal history during a traffic stop not unreasonable