Author Archives: Hall

NY1: Failure to controvert any facts or make an argument justifies denying suppression hearing

“Although the felony complaint, indictment, voluntary disclosure form, arraignment transcript, and search warrant affidavit disclosed to defendant provided him with ‘detailed information about the sequence of events leading up to his arrest’ …, he failed to controvert the specific information … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on NY1: Failure to controvert any facts or make an argument justifies denying suppression hearing

D.D.C.: Subpoena to govt contractor wasn’t too burdensome

As narrowed by the parties, the subpoena to Office Depot as a government contractor wasn’t too burdensome. United States v. Office Depot, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197661 (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 2024)*:

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Subpoena to govt contractor wasn’t too burdensome

CA5: Police shooting from behind after escalating violent situation was not unreasonable

The police shooting here from behind was not unreasonable on the totality. “When McVae threw the rock, Trooper Perez had to make an immediate reflexive decision of how to protect himself in a rapidly evolving situation against an increasingly violent … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: Police shooting from behind after escalating violent situation was not unreasonable

Bloomberg Law: Full Fourth Circuit Will Rehear Google Geofence Warrants Case

Bloomberg Law: Full Fourth Circuit Will Rehear Google Geofence Warrants Case by Cassandre Coyer. The panel opinion is United States v. Chatrie, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 16692 (4th Cir. July 9, 2024) (2-1), and posted here.

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on Bloomberg Law: Full Fourth Circuit Will Rehear Google Geofence Warrants Case

OR: Backpack’s inventory on admission to treatment facility was reasonable

Police could inventory defendant’s backpack when he was picked up and transported to a treatment facility. Inventory was provided for by local ordinance. The same policies apply to inventory even if defendant isn’t in jail. State v. Wilcox, 335 Or … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of proof, Curtilage, Inventory, Knock and talk, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: Backpack’s inventory on admission to treatment facility was reasonable

WI: Social media TOS agreements show no REP in CP

The Terms of Service agreements of social media platforms state that they are required by law to report child pornography. Therefore, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s files that are child pornography. State v. Gasper, 2024 Wisc. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Social media warrants | Comments Off on WI: Social media TOS agreements show no REP in CP

CA2: 4A doesn’t incorporate state procedural rules and statutes

The constitution doesn’t incorporate state criminal procedural rules and statutes, and a violation of them doesn’t make a Fourth Amendment violation. See Virginia v. Moore. McCullough v. Graves, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 27503 (2d Cir. Oct. 30, 2024). The address … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA2: 4A doesn’t incorporate state procedural rules and statutes

E.D.Mich.: Ordering passenger from car in an uneventful traffic stop required RS; his assault on officer was intervening act

The traffic stop was uneventful at first, and the driver provided all the information and papers necessary. After that, the officers focused on the passenger and ordered him from the car, but that required reasonable suspicion. His assault of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Ordering passenger from car in an uneventful traffic stop required RS; his assault on officer was intervening act

PA: CI tip gave RS for dog sniff during stop

The CI’s tip gave reasonable suspicion to extend the stop for a dog sniff. Commonwealth v. Ortiz, 2024 PA Super 249, 2024 Pa. Super. LEXIS 467 (Oct. 29, 2024).* “Moreover, as noted above, Trooper Klun’s personal observation of Harris driving … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: CI tip gave RS for dog sniff during stop

Chronicle-Telegram: Elyria YWCA holds event to remember 4th Amendment pioneer Dollree Mapp

She’s an accidental pioneer. The Chronicle-Telegram: Elyria YWCA holds event to remember 4th Amendment pioneer Dollree Mapp by Richard Perrins (“The Elyria YWCA held an event Wednesday to teach about Dollree Mapp, a Cleveland woman whose Supreme Court case set … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on Chronicle-Telegram: Elyria YWCA holds event to remember 4th Amendment pioneer Dollree Mapp

Reason: After 100 Years, End the Open Fields Doctrine

Reason: After 100 Years, End the Open Fields Doctrine by Joe Lancaster (“In a decision issued at the dawn of Prohibition, the Supreme Court quietly gutted a freedom guaranteed in the Bill of Rights: the protection against unwarranted search and … Continue reading →

Posted in Open fields | Comments Off on Reason: After 100 Years, End the Open Fields Doctrine

OH4: Return of cell phone denied; it’s still potential evidence, and part of delay is refusing to give passcode

“Based on our review of the record, we find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Smith’s motion for return of his electronic devices. At the time of Smith’s request, it appears that the property was still … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Privileges, Standing | Comments Off on OH4: Return of cell phone denied; it’s still potential evidence, and part of delay is refusing to give passcode

N.D.Cal.: Second frisk at scene of SW was still with RS

Defendant was frisked a second time during execution of a search warrant, and a gun was found. The second frisker didn’t know about the first. There was still reasonable suspicion for a frisk that he was armed and dangerous. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Pretext, Protective sweep, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Second frisk at scene of SW was still with RS

OH7: Postal worker’s information about defendant’s cash and mail was PC for warrant

A postal worker’s information that defendant had lots of cash and was receiving packages that smelled like marijuana was probable cause for his house. State v. Middleton, 2024-Ohio-5172, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3877 (7th Dist. Oct. 28, 2024).* The use … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Strip search | Comments Off on OH7: Postal worker’s information about defendant’s cash and mail was PC for warrant

N.D.Iowa: There was PC before the dog stuck his nose through the window

The dog sticking his nose through the window was a search, but the officers already had probable cause by then. Therefore, no exclusionary. United States v. Newberry, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195271 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 28, 2024). On the government’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: There was PC before the dog stuck his nose through the window

Podcast: Fourth Amendment Protections in a Connected World

Digital Boundaries: Fourth Amendment Protections in a Connected World — The Presumption of Innocence (Podcast) (“Modern technology is testing the limits of the Fourth Amendment and redefining the parameters of privacy. Michael Price, Litigation Director of the Fourth Amendment Center … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Podcast: Fourth Amendment Protections in a Connected World

mashable: Police may track you to an abortion clinic with this tool, report shows

mashable: Police may track you to an abortion clinic with this tool, report shows by Matt Binder (“An inside look at the tool, Locate X, found just how closely it could track users.”)

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on mashable: Police may track you to an abortion clinic with this tool, report shows

W.D.La.: Def counsel’s failure to object to GFE in R&R not IAC where it couldn’t win anyway

The R&R also decided the good faith exception applied to this search, but defense counsel didn’t object. It’s a meritless issue, so defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not objecting. United States v. Harp, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194730 (W.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Pole cameras | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Def counsel’s failure to object to GFE in R&R not IAC where it couldn’t win anyway

E.D.Va.: Reporting requirements of Corporate Transparency Act don’t violate 4A under California Bankers

Plaintiffs challenge the Corporate Transparency Act on several grounds. As to their claim the reporting requirement violates the Fourth Amendment, there is no likelihood of success on the merits under California Bankers decided 50 years ago. Community Ass’ns Inst. v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Reporting requirements of Corporate Transparency Act don’t violate 4A under California Bankers

OK: Exclusion not the remedy for knock-and-announce violation under state constitution either

Exclusion is not the remedy for a knock-and-announce violation, following Hudson under state constitution, too. State v. Velasquez, 2024 OK CR 29, 2024 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 28 (Oct. 24, 2024). Officers had a warrant for defendant’s arrest, and when … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Knock and announce, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OK: Exclusion not the remedy for knock-and-announce violation under state constitution either