CA8: Social media video of SW target shooting guns justified no-knock entry

Social media videos of a target of the warrant shooting guns viewed before obtaining the warrant justified a no-knock warrant. Davenport v. City of Little Rock, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16540 (8th Cir. July 7, 2025).

Plaintiff’s various claims, including a Fourth Amendment claim, were barred by limitations. Topolski v. Wash. State Dep’t of Licensing, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128433 (W.D. Wash. July 7, 2025).*

Post-conviction petitioner shows no grounds on which his Instagram messages should have been suppressed. Therefore, no ineffective assistance of counsel. Turcios v. State, 2025 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 311 (July 7, 2025).*

This motion to suppress filed 2½ years after sentencing was waived by the guilty plea, isn’t timely, and defense counsel wasn’t ineffective. Eddington v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128448 (S.D. Ill. July 7, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Knock and announce. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.