Daily Archives: April 25, 2026

S.D.Ohio: DEA agents tailing a car can request marked unit to make a traffic stop for violations they saw

DEA agents following defendant in an unmarked car observed traffic violations, and they requested a marked unit to make a stop, which was valid. United States v. Peterson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90905 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 24, 2026).* A state … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: DEA agents tailing a car can request marked unit to make a traffic stop for violations they saw

M.D.Ala.: Officer’s adhering to particularity wasn’t a failure to uncover Brady information

“To the contrary, this testimony confirms only that Agent Evans’s forensic examination was circumscribed by the legal boundaries of the search warrant. Cox’s attempt to equate the examiner’s adherence to those boundaries with a failure to uncover exculpatory evidence is … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Officer’s adhering to particularity wasn’t a failure to uncover Brady information

W.D.Tenn.: Facebook SW for evidence of gang activity was particular enough, considering context

This Facebook warrant for information about gang activity was based on probable cause and was particular enough, considering the context of what the government was looking for. In any event, it wasn’t so bad that the good faith exception didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Social media warrants | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Facebook SW for evidence of gang activity was particular enough, considering context

CA10: Tribal and state court SWs: state judge wanted more information, but that didn’t make tribal warrant lack PC

Defendant lived on tribal lands with a co-occupant who was not Native American. Officers obtained two search warrants: one from a tribal court and one from a state court. The applications were identical. The state judge, however, wanted more information, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: Tribal and state court SWs: state judge wanted more information, but that didn’t make tribal warrant lack PC

OR: Voluntary consent to a blood draw after accident and pain meds in hospital

Defendant voluntarily consented to a blood draw for DUII at the hospital despite having been in an accident and received pain medication. State v. Miller, 375 Or. 173 (Apr. 23, 2026). There was probable cause to put a tracking device … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on OR: Voluntary consent to a blood draw after accident and pain meds in hospital

W.D.Wash.: SDT to Seattle Children’s Hospital was pretextual

On the government’s motion to alter or amend judgment, these health care fraud subpoenas to Seattle Children’s Hospital seek too much private patient information and are also found to be pretextual. In re Subpoena Duces Tecum No. 25-1431-016, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: SDT to Seattle Children’s Hospital was pretextual

N.D.Ga.: A filter team not required to examine seized photographs

A filter team wasn’t required to examine seized photographs. Overseizure doesn’t make a search unreasonable unless it was flagrant, and this wasn’t. United States v. Alford, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87350 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 20, 2026). “Even if the pre-warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Overseizure, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: A filter team not required to examine seized photographs

CA5: Officer’s touching parent’s arm to get her through a school door for four seconds was de minimis

In a school grounds dispute, a parent’s arm was grabbed for four seconds to move her through a doorway. “Under the circumstances, we cannot say that such de minimis force was ‘clearly’ excessive and unreasonable. … Dupuy knew that the … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: Officer’s touching parent’s arm to get her through a school door for four seconds was de minimis

N.D.Ohio: Where 1 of 10 officers in a search wore a bodycam, that doesn’t mean the others couldn’t be credible

“Harris also questions the ‘credibility’ of the officers executing the search warrant because only 1 out of 10 officers … wore a body camera at any point during the search. But other than generalized complaints about the lack of body … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Where 1 of 10 officers in a search wore a bodycam, that doesn’t mean the others couldn’t be credible

CA9: Illegal arrest doesn’t justify dismissal of indictment

An illegal arrest doesn’t justify dismissing an indictment. He also did not show outrageous governmental conduct. United States v. Colfax, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11426 (9th Cir. Apr. 22, 2026). The officer knew Dodge pickup trucks, and the registration on … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Illegal arrest doesn’t justify dismissal of indictment

DE: Doesn’t violate 4A to have bodycam on during SW execution

It doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment for a police officer to execute a search warrant with a bodycam on. Defendant cites no authority, either. State v. Williams, 2026 Del. Super. LEXIS 183 (Apr. 22, 2026):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on DE: Doesn’t violate 4A to have bodycam on during SW execution

E.D.Mich.: Possible 5A violation in obtaining cell phone passcode mooted by inevitable discovery; they’d get into it anyway

The government obtained defendant’s cell phone passcode by questioning him. Despite the potential Fifth Amendment violation, the court finds that the cell phone would have been opened by the government’s forensics team anyway, so inevitable discovery applies. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, immigration stops, Pretext, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Possible 5A violation in obtaining cell phone passcode mooted by inevitable discovery; they’d get into it anyway

CA3: Cell phone warrant for CSAM could be broad because of possible hiding and misidentifying files

This CSAM cell phone warrant was broad, but that’s a recognition that files could have false names to hide them. It was not unreasonable. United States v. Daniels, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11323 (3d Cir. Apr. 21, 2026):

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on CA3: Cell phone warrant for CSAM could be broad because of possible hiding and misidentifying files

DC: Affidavit for SW for cell phone showed no PC or nexus to crime

The search warrant for defendant’s phone showed nothing about probable cause to believe any evidence would be on it. The mere fact he likely carried the phone with him all the time isn’t enough. (But the court concedes maybe it’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on DC: Affidavit for SW for cell phone showed no PC or nexus to crime

MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

Police entry onto defendant’s house and yard because his mother, who he lived with, was missing, and relatives called the police. After looking in the house for her, they found her decapitated in the back yard, then they got a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

N.D.Cal.: Detailed collection of video viewing information survives motion to dismiss

Plaintiff alleged a privacy interest in video viewing information where defendant “collected detailed video viewing information to package individuals into audiences based, for example, on their political leanings because they watched the State of the Union, or ‘liberal affinity news,’ … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Detailed collection of video viewing information survives motion to dismiss