Daily Archives: April 7, 2026

CA10: Ptf’s dismissed murder case for overlooked exculpatory evidence was still based on PC

Plaintiff was arrested for murder of his wife, but the case was dismissed without prejudice. He claimed a civil Franks violation. There was still arguable probable cause even with that which was omitted. No claim. Morphew v. Chaffee Cty., 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Ptf’s dismissed murder case for overlooked exculpatory evidence was still based on PC

CA10: Apple SW was insufficiently particular, but GFE still applies

“We agree with Kimberley that the Apple search warrant was insufficiently particularized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. However, we hold that, in the circumstances of this case, the Government has shown the good faith exception to the warrant requirement … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nighttime search, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Apple SW was insufficiently particular, but GFE still applies

N.D.Ga.: Court refuses to vacate Rule 41(g) evidentiary hearing on return of Fulton County ballots

In the Fulton County ballot seizure case, the court refuses to vacate its order for a Rule 41(g) hearing on return of the records. Pitts v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74137 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 20, 2026):

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Court refuses to vacate Rule 41(g) evidentiary hearing on return of Fulton County ballots

CA6: 3 days between controlled buy and SW execution not stale

This search warrant didn’t go stale in the three days between the controlled buy and its execution. United States v. Lawrence, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 9780 (6th Cir. Apr. 3, 2026).* The BAC blood draw statute includes drawing and testing, … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Issue preclusion, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: 3 days between controlled buy and SW execution not stale

S.D.N.Y.: Constant surveillance of a car not needed for PC

There was probable cause for search of an Uber for drugs based on police surveillance. Defendant’s mention of supposed gaps in surveillance don’t mitigate the probable cause. “Their lack of an airtight case against the defendant, at the time of … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Independent source, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Constant surveillance of a car not needed for PC