S.D.Ind.: Post search database search of occupants of a place didn’t show SW affidavit was false at time it issued

An open source database internet search after the search in this case that showed defendant resided at the place to be searched after the search didn’t prove he wasn’t at the time of the search under Franks. Perryman v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 239448 (S.D. Ind. Oct. 20, 2026)*:

The Fourth Amendment does not require that “every fact recited in the warrant affidavit is necessarily correct,” but it does require that “the information put forth” in the affidavit “is believed or appropriately accepted by the affiant as true.” [Franks] Under Franks:

evidence recovered from a search must be suppressed if a defendant proves by a preponderance of the evidence that: (1) the affidavit contained material false statements or omissions; (2) these false statements or omissions were made with deliberate or reckless disregard for the truth; and (3) these false statements or omissions were necessary to a finding of probable cause.

United States v. Gregory, 795 F.3d 735, 743 (7th Cir. 2015).

As an initial matter, one database’s incorrect report that Mr. Perryman was an occupant of the residence after the search took place does not prove that he was not an occupant of the resident before the search took place. Further, in documents attached to Mr. Perryman’s § 2255 motion, counsel relayed that other evidence supported a finding of probable cause for the search warrant. … Mr. Perryman does not address that determination in his § 2255 motion and therefore cannot demonstrate that he was prejudiced by counsel’s decision not to challenge the warrant under Franks. See Lickers v. United States, 98 F.4th 847, 858-59 (7th Cir. 2024) (rejecting ineffective assistance claim for failure to seek a Franks hearing).

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.