Monthly Archives: March 2025

CA3: Apartment visitor to conduct drug deal has no standing

An apartment visitor to conduct a drug deal has no standing to contest a search that happened while he was there. United States v. Loyal, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5853 (3d Cir. Mar. 13, 2025). By collective knowledge, there was … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Pretext, Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: Apartment visitor to conduct drug deal has no standing

CA6: Mandamus doesn’t lie to force grant of a motion to suppress

Mandamus doesn’t lie to compel a district court to grant a motion to suppress and dismiss an indictment because of an alleged change in the dates of the charge to cover up an illegal search. There’s a possible remedy in … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA6: Mandamus doesn’t lie to force grant of a motion to suppress

VI: Wife had apparent authority to consent to search for firearm in bedroom, even if they didn’t share it

Defendant’s wife had apparent common authority to consent to a police entry while defendant slept. She led police into the home and directed them to the handgun in defendant’s bedroom closet. This satisfied co-occupant consent. They lived together, she knew … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Privileges | Comments Off on VI: Wife had apparent authority to consent to search for firearm in bedroom, even if they didn’t share it

GA: SW for air bag module and vehicle black box issued with PC and was particular

This search warrant for the Airbag Control Modules and the vehicle’s black box was issued on probable cause and was particular in a vehicular homicide case. Hutchins v. State, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 134 (Mar. 13, 2025):

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on GA: SW for air bag module and vehicle black box issued with PC and was particular

W.D.N.Y.: Just saying the Stone bar is “misplaced” isn’t an answer

“In his reply …, Petitioner asserts in conclusory fashion that Respondent’s application of Stone is ‘misplaced.’ … However, he fails to explain why this is so. Nor does he attempt to show that he did not have a ‘full and … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Just saying the Stone bar is “misplaced” isn’t an answer

OH2: Motion to suppress not proper to challenge authentication of a record for trial

A motion to suppress doesn’t lie just because the defense thinks that a record can be authenticated under Rule 901. State v. Wolfe, 2025-Ohio-866 (2d Dist. Mar. 14, 2025). “Because Phillips did not make a contemporaneous objection to either the … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH2: Motion to suppress not proper to challenge authentication of a record for trial

IN: Greyhound bus subject to automobile exception because dog alerted on luggage compartment

If you’re riding a bus and drugs are found on one, are all subject to search. The answer can’t be yes, but it is here: Defendant was a passenger on a Greyhound bus on I-80. The bus crossed the centerline … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on IN: Greyhound bus subject to automobile exception because dog alerted on luggage compartment

D.P.R.: Motion to dismiss for an alleged illegal search is not the proper way to raise the issue

A motion to dismiss for an alleged illegal search is not the proper way to raise the issue. United States v. Ruiz-Ruiz, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47357 (D.P.R. Mar. 12, 2025):

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Motion to dismiss for an alleged illegal search is not the proper way to raise the issue

55 years ago today: NPR: On This Day In 1970: Hruska Links Judge To ‘Mediocre’

NPR: On This Day In 1970: Hruska Links Judge To ‘Mediocre’ by Ken Rudin:

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on 55 years ago today: NPR: On This Day In 1970: Hruska Links Judge To ‘Mediocre’

MD: A search warrant for a car’s GPS system

A search warrant for a car’s GPS system: “Officers also executed a ‘Berla warrant’2 to extract navigation data from the car’s GPS system. The navigation data showed that, on the morning of the shooting, the Maserati left Oak Haven Circle … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on MD: A search warrant for a car’s GPS system

CA2: Exigency of potential destruction of evidence has to be “in real time”

This pro se plaintiff was the subject of a sexual assault investigation that led to officers warrantlessly entering and seizing his home for 12½ hours before getting a warrant. Summary judgment was granted the officers. Exigent circumstances didn’t justify the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA2: Exigency of potential destruction of evidence has to be “in real time”

D.Minn.: Probable cause for evidence of tax evasion in the home where records would be

Probable cause for evidence of tax evasion in the home where records would be: “Here, the affidavit sought to establish probable cause to believe Mr. Erickson took part in an ongoing scheme to evade paying taxes. Toward that end, the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Probable cause for evidence of tax evasion in the home where records would be

E.D.Tenn.: Ammunition on the person is PC for firearm in the home

Possession on the person of a significant amount of ammunition was probable cause and nexus to defendant’s house for the firearm. United States v. Partin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47025 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2025). Probable cause for evidence of … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Ammunition on the person is PC for firearm in the home

D.N.J.: OSHA site inspection was on a neutral plan and particular

OSHA sought an inspection warrant for a cannabis producer in New Jersey. It was based on a neutral inspection plan [no complaints] and was particular in scope and therefore reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Inspection Warrant, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on D.N.J.: OSHA site inspection was on a neutral plan and particular

IN: Crossing the curtilage to get to defendant’s front door at 11:30 pm violated the Indiana Const.

Crossing the curtilage to get to defendant’s front door at 11:30 pm violated the Indiana Constitution under its Litchfield case. State v. Hendricks, 2025 Ind. App. LEXIS 71 (Mar. 12, 2025). Defendant parked in a “no parking” zone at the … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: Crossing the curtilage to get to defendant’s front door at 11:30 pm violated the Indiana Const.

E.D.Mo.: Single image that officer opined was CP is PC

“Under Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit law, Detective Erwin’s professional opinion [based on her experience] that the file contained child pornography was sufficient to establish probable case for the issuance of the search warrant. See Ornelas, 517 U.S. at 700; … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Single image that officer opined was CP is PC

M.D.Fla.: Not IAC to not call private searcher at suppression hearing where it wouldn’t have changed the outcome

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not calling a “hotel maid” who found defendant’s gun at the suppression hearing that led to his ACCA sentence. He doesn’t show that she would have changed the outcome. The private search issue was litigated … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance, Knock and announce | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Not IAC to not call private searcher at suppression hearing where it wouldn’t have changed the outcome

CA9: Jury verdict that officer violated clearly established rights and precluded qualified immunity

One defendant was not entitled to qualified immunity on the merits because the jury found that he violated plaintiff’s clearly established Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive force by using deadly force when he posed no immediate threat. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Jury verdict that officer violated clearly established rights and precluded qualified immunity

WA: There was an objective basis for this stop even if with pretext

There was an objective basis for defendant’s stop, even if the officer had subjective motives. State v. Olson, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 423 (Mar. 11, 2025).* Defendant was in prison for about 20 years and there were phone calls between … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on WA: There was an objective basis for this stop even if with pretext

CA5: Stay of § 1983 shooting case was properly denied pending state criminal case

Plaintiff was charged in state court and sued under § 1983 in federal court over his shooting by the police. The federal court refused a stay and plaintiff ended up taking the Fifth. The denial of the stay of the … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on CA5: Stay of § 1983 shooting case was properly denied pending state criminal case