Daily Archives: March 20, 2025

OR: Following def in an unmarked police car is not a seizure, and he voluntarily stopped

Following defendant in an unmarked car was not a seizure. Defendant ultimately voluntarily stopped and talked to the officer. State v. Serini, 2025 Ore. App. LEXIS 446 (Mar. 19, 2025).* When defendant was placed in the patrol car, the officer … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on OR: Following def in an unmarked police car is not a seizure, and he voluntarily stopped

AK: Public court filings violate no REP

“Herndon’s argument that her rights under the Fourth Amendment were violated when the superior court ‘commingled [her] private filings making it public’ is without merit. Herndon has no reasonable expectation of privacy in information that she voluntarily submitted to the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Public court filings violate no REP

GA: Dog sniff of car while citation being filled out did not extend stop; suppression reversed

While the stopping officer was filling out the citation, a second officer arrived. The dog sniff occurred while the citation was still being filled out, so it didn’t extend the stop. Grant of motion to suppress reversed. State v. Dean, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Dog sniff of car while citation being filled out did not extend stop; suppression reversed

D.P.R.: Officers’ reliance on differing versions of weapons law was objectively reasonable

The Spanish and English versions of a section of the Puerto Rico Weapons Law differ with “and” and “or” and reliance on whichever is objectively reasonable under Heien. United States v. Rosa-Ufred, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49334 (D.P.R. Mar. 14, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Officers’ reliance on differing versions of weapons law was objectively reasonable