Daily Archives: March 8, 2025

W.D.Mich.: Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements are an unreasonable search

The Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements amount to an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. Small Bus. Ass’n of Mich. v. Yellen, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40975 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 3, 2025):

Posted in Informational privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements are an unreasonable search

W.D.Mo.: Prior ruling on motion to suppress before speedy trial dismissal was law of the case

Defendant lost a motion to suppress but won a speedy trial dismissal without prejudice. Reindicted, he filed another motion to suppress, but law of the case applies. United States v. Bell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41924 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 7, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Prior ruling on motion to suppress before speedy trial dismissal was law of the case

TN: Nexus shown to cell phone in murder case

The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress the search of his cell phone in a murder case. On the state’s interlocutory appeal, suppression is reversed. There was sufficient nexus shown between the cell phone and the offense under investigation … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on TN: Nexus shown to cell phone in murder case

CA2: 50 days of pole camera surveillance outside a business wasn’t unreasonable search

A pole camera outside defendant’s business for 50 days was not an unreasonable search. United States v. Harry, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5329 (2d Cir. Mar. 7, 2025). Defendant was improperly denied a hearing. The codefendant had a suppression hearing … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Pole cameras, Standing | Comments Off on CA2: 50 days of pole camera surveillance outside a business wasn’t unreasonable search

OH6: Background information didn’t make SW affidavit stale

Information in the affidavit for warrant about a 2021 overdose was valid background and not stale information. State v. Martin, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 727 (6th Dist. Mar. 7, 2025). Officers getting a search warrant to enter to arrest was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Staleness | Comments Off on OH6: Background information didn’t make SW affidavit stale