Daily Archives: March 10, 2025

CA9: State officers can consider federal crimes in assessing PC

The district court erred three ways in this case: The potential of a federal crime could be considered by the officer in determining probable cause. There was reasonable suspicion to prolong the stop. The automobile exception applied. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: State officers can consider federal crimes in assessing PC

N.D.Ohio: Pole camera view into second story window of house was unreasonable search, but govt prevails anyway

A second story pole camera that actually could see into defendant’s house was unreasonable as to that. But, “[b]ecause there is an independent basis for upholding the validity of the search warrant, this Court will not suppress the evidence seized … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Pole camera view into second story window of house was unreasonable search, but govt prevails anyway

CA6: Entering land to post a notice of civil infraction from the property was not a “search”

“The crux of the Gammarinos’ [Fourth Amendment] argument is that the Defendants entered their properties and removed their personal property without a warrant. As a result, they claim these searches and seizures are presumptively unreasonable and thus violated the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Search | Comments Off on CA6: Entering land to post a notice of civil infraction from the property was not a “search”

E.D.La.: Pursuing fleeing drug dealer into an apartment was reasonable

Pursuing fleeing drug dealer into an apartment was reasonable. United States v. Williams, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39113 (E.D. La. Mar. 5, 2025):

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Pursuing fleeing drug dealer into an apartment was reasonable

CA6: Nexus to home based on controlled buys doesn’t require constant visual surveillance

Controlled buys that included trips to defendant’s house was nexus. “Regardless of whether Sims was constantly within the detectives’ view, the affidavit establishes that for each controlled buy, Sims went straight to the buy location from the residence and returned … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Nexus to home based on controlled buys doesn’t require constant visual surveillance

D.P.R.: Defense counsel’s agreement to accept a SW was waiver of Rule 41 service requirements

Defense counsel’s acceptance of a warrant was a waiver of the service requirements for a warrant in Rule 41. It was also otherwise valid. United States v. Reynoso, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40555 (D.P.R. Mar. 4, 2025). “The search and … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Defense counsel’s agreement to accept a SW was waiver of Rule 41 service requirements