OH2: Motion to suppress not proper to challenge authentication of a record for trial

A motion to suppress doesn’t lie just because the defense thinks that a record can be authenticated under Rule 901. State v. Wolfe, 2025-Ohio-866 (2d Dist. Mar. 14, 2025).

“Because Phillips did not make a contemporaneous objection to either the admission of the body-camera footage or the search warrant at trial, his argument on this issue is procedurally barred.” It’s not plain error, either. Phillips v. State, 2025 Miss. LEXIS 69 (Mar. 13, 2025).*

Defense counsel’s failure to look at the cell phone search production that led to hearsay text messages coming in was ineffective assistance of counsel. People v. Cousins, 2025 NY Slip Op 01535 (4th Dept. Mar. 14, 2025).*

“This case presents a narrow question: whether possession of a shopping cart in a place where shopping carts are not usually found (i.e., away from a store with shopping carts) provides a reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory detention. We hold that it does not.” State v. Fink, 2025 Ida. App. LEXIS 11 (Mar. 14, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Admissibility of evidence, Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.