VI: Wife had apparent authority to consent to search for firearm in bedroom, even if they didn’t share it

Defendant’s wife had apparent common authority to consent to a police entry while defendant slept. She led police into the home and directed them to the handgun in defendant’s bedroom closet. This satisfied co-occupant consent. They lived together, she knew the keypad code to unlock the front door, and, regardless of whether she regularly slept in the same bedroom, there was no evidence that she was obstructed from entering the bedroom and defendant did not object to her presence or that of the officers upon awakening. People v. Thomas, 2025 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 8 (Mar. 11, 2025).

A civil fabrication of evidence claim arises under both the Fourth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment due process. Clark v. Abdallah, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5878 (6th Cir. Mar. 13, 2025).*

As presented, evidence of defendant’s refusal to submit to a blood test is a novel question remanded for reconsideration. The trial court didn’t rule. State v. Dias, 2025 Ga. LEXIS 61 (Mar. 13, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Privileges. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.