D.N.J.: OSHA site inspection was on a neutral plan and particular

OSHA sought an inspection warrant for a cannabis producer in New Jersey. It was based on a neutral inspection plan [no complaints] and was particular in scope and therefore reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Inspection Warrant, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46978 (D.N.J. Mar. 14, 2025).

“Because Phillips did not make a contemporaneous objection to either the admission of the body-camera footage or the search warrant at trial, his argument on this issue is procedurally barred.” It’s not plain error, either. Phillips v. State, 2025 Miss. LEXIS 69 (Mar. 13, 2025).*

“Daniels asserts on appeal that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress evidence. Because Daniels’ argument relies upon proof outside of the record, and because he waived his argument when he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered his guilty plea, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.” State v. Daniels, 2025-Ohio-869 (6th Dist. Mar. 14, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Ineffective assistance, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.