Monthly Archives: November 2021

Reason: “The Fourth Amendment Limits of Internet Content Preservation”

Reason: “The Fourth Amendment Limits of Internet Content Preservation” by Orin S. Kerr (“A strong Fourth Amendment claim that criminal defense lawyers should be making.”):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on Reason: “The Fourth Amendment Limits of Internet Content Preservation”

Politico: FBI raid on Project Veritas founder’s home sparks questions about press freedom

Politico: FBI raid on Project Veritas founder’s home sparks questions about press freedom by Josh Gerstein (“The action against James O’Keefe has prompted concern about the Biden administration’s commitment to the First Amendment.”) Is O’Keefe a “journalist” or not? He … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on Politico: FBI raid on Project Veritas founder’s home sparks questions about press freedom

Misc.

There was probable cause for the first and second search warrants for child pornography on defendant’s devices (took ~100 pages to say that). No exclusionary rule; good faith exception applies, too. United States v. Pena, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218914 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on Misc.

NY4: Minor typos in SW application don’t void the warrant

“We reject defendant’s contention that the search warrant for his cell phones was issued without probable cause. According ‘great deference to the issuing [Justice]’ …, we conclude that Supreme Court properly determined that there was sufficient information in the warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant papers, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NY4: Minor typos in SW application don’t void the warrant

E.D.Wis.: No hearing required on application of GFE; papers already show it

Defendant does not get a hearing on application of the good faith exception. The papers as a whole establish it for the government. The affidavit for the warrant showed sufficient information from observations for an inference that drugs were being … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: No hearing required on application of GFE; papers already show it

CA6: Individual officer not responsible for process that denied ptf prompt PC hearing under Riverside

While an arrested person has a right to a prompt judicial determination of probable cause for the arrest, it’s not necessarily on the officer to get the person before a magistrate. “[I]t was not objectively unreasonable for Wynkoop to expect … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Individual officer not responsible for process that denied ptf prompt PC hearing under Riverside

S.D.N.Y.: Emailing SW materials subject to protective order results in contempt conviction

Defendant’s emailing a reporter search warrant materials subject to a protective order results in his conviction for contempt. Defendant understood the order, and only defense counsel was able to use the materials, not him. He was later pro se but … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Emailing SW materials subject to protective order results in contempt conviction

TX10: Def’s invitation to look in vehicle console for receipt for allegedly stolen property led to plain view of drugs

Defendant was suspected of leaving a Lowes with a stolen shop vac. He was seen at a nearby McDonalds and officers came up to him. He volunteered that the receipt was in his console and they could look for it. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search | Comments Off on TX10: Def’s invitation to look in vehicle console for receipt for allegedly stolen property led to plain view of drugs

MS: Judicial notice proper that SW execution at 11 pm is not during daylight hours

A court can take judicial notice that execution of a search warrant at 11 pm is not during daylight hours in Mississippi. Doe v. Doe, 2021 Miss. App. LEXIS 473 (Nov. 9, 2021) (only recognizing rule; this is not a … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nighttime search, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MS: Judicial notice proper that SW execution at 11 pm is not during daylight hours

Intercept: School Officials Welcome Homeland Security Surveillance After Student Fights

Intercept: School Officials Welcome Homeland Security Surveillance After Student Fights (“Administrators in Prince George’s County say they wanted help monitoring school safety — but sweeping surveillance could land kids in gang databases and families in deportation proceedings.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Intercept: School Officials Welcome Homeland Security Surveillance After Student Fights

techdirt: Institute For Justice Survey Shows How Philadelphia’s Forfeiture Program Preyed On Poor Minorities

techdirt: Institute For Justice Survey Shows How Philadelphia’s Forfeiture Program Preyed On Poor Minorities (“The Institute for Justice managed to kill off most of Philadelphia’s severely abused civil forfeiture program in 2018. Litigation resulted in a consent decree that banned law enforcement from seizing … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on techdirt: Institute For Justice Survey Shows How Philadelphia’s Forfeiture Program Preyed On Poor Minorities

Reason: SCOTUS Has Made It Practically Impossible To Sue a Rights-Violating Federal Officer

Reason: SCOTUS Has Made It Practically Impossible To Sue a Rights-Violating Federal Officer by Damon Root (“Several recent Supreme Court decisions have made it practically impossible to sue a federal officer over alleged violations of constitutional rights. Now the Court … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on Reason: SCOTUS Has Made It Practically Impossible To Sue a Rights-Violating Federal Officer

IN: Knock-and-talk not barred by Jardines

DNA from a cold case murder was sent to a DNA genealogy company who tentatively matched defendant to the crime. Police did a trash pull and got more of a DNA match. Then they got a search warrant for his … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Curtilage, Knock and talk, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IN: Knock-and-talk not barred by Jardines

WA: HIPAA violation in seizing medical records by SW required their return

The trial court’s order denying return of patient records taken by search warrant from the petitioner youth services provider failed to comply with HIPAA requirements should have been granted. While the records have been returned and the case is otherwise … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on WA: HIPAA violation in seizing medical records by SW required their return

D.N.M.: Modified civil investigative demand wasn’t shown to be unreasonable

The petitioner doesn’t show that the civil investigative demand in a fraud case was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment or that it could not reach accommodation with the government. In re Civil Investigative Demand No. 21mc24 WJ/SCY, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Excessive force, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Modified civil investigative demand wasn’t shown to be unreasonable

OH: Statute doesn’t change rule that felony arrest on PC doesn’t need an arrest warrant

The Fourth Amendment and Ohio Constitution permit felony arrests in public on probable cause without exigency. Statute doesn’t change that. State v. Jordan, 2021-Ohio-3922, 2021 Ohio LEXIS 2213 (Nov. 9, 2021). “Here, the collective knowledge of Troopers Schulz, Colindres, and … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Collective knowledge, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH: Statute doesn’t change rule that felony arrest on PC doesn’t need an arrest warrant

S.D.Cal.: Minister of church with several locations doesn’t have standing from status alone

Being a church minister with several locations does not confer standing as to search warrants for the church as a whole. United States v. Torres, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215682 (S.D.Cal. Nov. 8, 2021):

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Minister of church with several locations doesn’t have standing from status alone

S.D.N.Y.: Supposed Franks challenge really only expressing things for cross at trial

Defendant’s motion to reconsideration seems to raise a Franks-type challenge to the search which was not the focus of his original motion to suppress. What he raises “may be interesting cross-examination at trial, [but] they fail entirely to undermine the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Supposed Franks challenge really only expressing things for cross at trial

D.Conn.: Flight from the police with abandonment of stuff obviates the need to decide RS for the stop

Defendant’s flight from the police and abandonment of items in flight was not while he was “seized.” Thus, the need to decide reasonable suspicion for a stop is obviated. United States v. Sockwell, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215294 (D.Conn. Nov. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Flight from the police with abandonment of stuff obviates the need to decide RS for the stop

W.D.Pa.: GFE applies to warrantless stop based on reasonable mistake of fact

The good faith exception is here directly applied to a warrantless stop and resulting search because of a “reasonable” mistake of law. United States v. McBroom, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215219 (W.D.Pa. Nov. 8. 2021):

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: GFE applies to warrantless stop based on reasonable mistake of fact