Monthly Archives: October 2021

LA4: SDT for tort ptf’s cell phone records was unreasonable and disproportionate

A subpoena duces tecum in a civil case for a plaintiff’s cell phone records was quashed and affirmed on appeal. Because of the substantial reasonable expectation of privacy in phone records, this was not proportionate to the case or the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on LA4: SDT for tort ptf’s cell phone records was unreasonable and disproportionate

NH: Enclosed porch is part of the house, not just part of curtilage

Defendant’s enclosed porch, which also was a living space, was part of the house and not just curtilage. Police entry was unreasonable. The fact there was another solid door to the main house isn’t determinative. There was no implied right … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Probable cause | Comments Off on NH: Enclosed porch is part of the house, not just part of curtilage

OH5: Def’s consent after being told drug dog was coming for her car wasn’t voluntary

The trial court held defendant’s consent was involuntary. She was asked for consent and told that a drug dog was coming so she might as well give it up. The conclusion is supported by the evidence and isn’t clearly erroneous. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Voluntariness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH5: Def’s consent after being told drug dog was coming for her car wasn’t voluntary

NY3: Tossing backpack from one’s window into the window of the abandoned house next door to avoid seizure is a waiver of REP

When the police came to his house, defendant threw a backpack with a sawed-off rifle from his second floor window into a window of the house next door. He claimed that house was his uncle’s, but it was unsecured and … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY3: Tossing backpack from one’s window into the window of the abandoned house next door to avoid seizure is a waiver of REP

NYT: Pulled Over: The Demand for Money Behind Many Police Traffic Stops

NYT: Pulled Over: The Demand for Money Behind Many Police Traffic Stops by Mike McIntire and Michael H. Keller (“Busted taillights, missing plates, tinted windows: Across the U.S., ticket revenue funds towns — and the police responsible for finding violations.”):

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on NYT: Pulled Over: The Demand for Money Behind Many Police Traffic Stops

NYT: Pulled Over: Why Many Police Traffic Stops Turn Deadly

NYT: Pulled Over: Why Many Police Traffic Stops Turn Deadly by David D. Kirkpatrick, Steve Eder, Kim Barker and Julie Tate (“Officers, trained to presume danger, have reacted with outsize aggression. For hundreds of unarmed drivers, the consequences have been … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on NYT: Pulled Over: Why Many Police Traffic Stops Turn Deadly

TX1: Commercial truck driver had standing to challenge seizure of cell phone from truck after his arrest

Defendant retained a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell phone that was left in the semi he was driving for a commercial carrier when he was arrested. The owner of the truck retrieved the phone and sent it to … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Standing, Strip search | Comments Off on TX1: Commercial truck driver had standing to challenge seizure of cell phone from truck after his arrest

N.D.Ohio: Where there was no nexus and whether GFE should apply was a really close question, govt essentially gets the benefit of the doubt

“For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Defendant Eben Anderson’s motion to suppress. With respect to Defendant Anthony Anderson, the affidavit supporting the warrant lacks probable cause justifying the search because there is no nexus between the phones and … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Where there was no nexus and whether GFE should apply was a really close question, govt essentially gets the benefit of the doubt

E.D.N.Y.: Handing over DL on request for police look wasn’t a seizure

Defendant was asked by the police for his ID. He gave it over and they noted it and gave it back. This was not a seizure. United States v. Stephenson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206467 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2021).* Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Handing over DL on request for police look wasn’t a seizure

W.D.N.C.: Using a key to open a lockbox named in a SW rather than breaking it open is hardly unreasonable

Using defendant’s key to unlock a lockbox within the terms of the search warrant was not unreasonable. United States v. Frady, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205784 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2021).* [Does he really expect that breaking into it is the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Voluntariness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Using a key to open a lockbox named in a SW rather than breaking it open is hardly unreasonable

N.D.Ill.: No REP in automatic license plate reader records in state database

The FBI querying the state automatic license plate reader database to connect a car to two bank robberies was not an unreasonable search. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the information. United States v. Brown, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: No REP in automatic license plate reader records in state database

CA10: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

“Plaintiffs maintain that, because Salt Lake City Police violated the Fourth Amendment by unconstitutionally searching and seizing Jerrail Taylor and Adam Thayne, their statements should be excluded in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. They advance this argument despite the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA10: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

CA9: Heck claims should be dismissed without prejudice

Heck claims should be dismissed without prejudice in case the plaintiff can invalidate the conviction. Lund v. California, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 32096 (9th Cir. Oct. 26, 2021). The case has a helpful explanation of Heck:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA9: Heck claims should be dismissed without prejudice

ID: Officer taking DL and handing it to another officer to check was a seizure requiring RS; anonymous CI was not corroborated

Reasonable suspicion was required when the officer retained defendant’s driver’s license by taking it, leaving her presence, and giving it to another officer to run a license check. Defendant was thus detained because a reasonable person in her position would … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Inevitable discovery, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: Officer taking DL and handing it to another officer to check was a seizure requiring RS; anonymous CI was not corroborated

N.D.N.Y.: Def’s additional exculpatory facts don’t undermine PC

There was plenty of probable cause for defendant’s arrest in his house based on statements and what the police learned in their child pornography investigation. “On top of that, the images already recovered from defendant’s devices were also more than … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Def’s additional exculpatory facts don’t undermine PC

ABAJ: Chemerinsky: SCOTUS continues to hold the line on qualified immunity

ABAJ: Chemerinsky: SCOTUS continues to hold the line on qualified immunity (“Two unanimous U.S. Supreme Court decisions on Oct. 18 show the justices are continuing to broadly interpret qualified immunity to limit suits against government officials, especially police officers. Perhaps … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on ABAJ: Chemerinsky: SCOTUS continues to hold the line on qualified immunity

Cato: Why Don’t Americans Have Stronger Financial Privacy Rights?

Cato: Why Don’t Americans Have Stronger Financial Privacy Rights? by Nicholas Anthony (“The announcement that the Biden administration proposed a $600 (now $10,000) threshold for bank account surveillance has left many people on social media wondering how such a proposal … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Cato: Why Don’t Americans Have Stronger Financial Privacy Rights?

CA11: Bag dropped to feet when def arrested couldn’t be searched incident to arrest; no safety concern

Officers accosted defendant to arrest him, and he dropped a paper bag. It could not seriously be argued that the bag contained a weapon. Moreover, the government did not argue abandonment. The district court erred in not granting the motion … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Search incident | Comments Off on CA11: Bag dropped to feet when def arrested couldn’t be searched incident to arrest; no safety concern

N.D.Ga.: No right to pre-execution litigation of an OSHA administrative SW

There is no right to a pre-enforcement motion to quash an OSHA administrative warrant, despite the fact the whole process occurs quickly. The company has a post-execution process to remedy alleged violations. United States v. Foundation Foods Group, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No right to pre-execution litigation of an OSHA administrative SW

Army: Loaning one’s phone to another without express limitations is a waiver of REP

The military judge abused his discretion in concluding that defendant did not essentially waive all his reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell phone by loaning it to another person, including the passcode to open it. “Understandings” aren’t enough; express … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Army: Loaning one’s phone to another without express limitations is a waiver of REP