Category Archives: State constitution

OR: State const. doesn’t bar checking for warrants during traffic stop

Officers are not prohibited under the state constitution from checking for outstanding warrants during a traffic stop, during a lull or not. There are valid safety and policy reasons for it. State v. Civil, 328 Or App 662, 2023 Ore. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: State const. doesn’t bar checking for warrants during traffic stop

D.Conn.: State constitutional argument has no basis in federal prosecution

In a federal case, defendant’s argument the state Constitution was violated in his search means nothing in a federal criminal prosecution. The search was valid under the Fourth Amendment’s collective knowledge doctrine, and it was properly limited in scope. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Probable cause, State constitution | Comments Off on D.Conn.: State constitutional argument has no basis in federal prosecution

ME: State constitutional arguments must be developed; citing it not enough

(1) The tracking device placed on defendant’s vehicle by court order was with probable cause. (2) “For a claim under the Maine Constitution to be deemed preserved for our review, however, the party advancing the claim cannot merely allude to … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Seizure, State constitution, Warrant execution | Comments Off on ME: State constitutional arguments must be developed; citing it not enough

ID: Pleading only state constitution waived 4A

Defendant’s pleading only the state constitution waived the Fourth Amendment claim. State v. Bell, 2023 Ida. LEXIS 95 (Aug. 15, 2023). Defendant complained trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging a search of house that was allegedly burglarized and defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Standing, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on ID: Pleading only state constitution waived 4A

CA4: Govt conceded delay for dog, but can’t show it was with RS

The government concedes that there was delay during the stop, but it was all without reasonable suspicion. The officer was looking for other summonses on defendant, including child support orders, where he had no idea there were any. “Finally, Deputy … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on CA4: Govt conceded delay for dog, but can’t show it was with RS

W.D.Mo.: No standing in a stolen car

No reasonable expectation of privacy [standing] in a stolen car. United States v. Burkhalter, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120556 (W.D. Mo. July 13, 2023). On a probation search, “Applying these principles, the Court finds that Brooks has failed to meet … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Due process, Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: No standing in a stolen car

FL1: If trial court refuses to unseal SW affidavit, in camera review must be sought to preserve issue

Defendant sought unsealing of the search warrant affidavit which the state successfully resisted on the ground of informant privilege in other ongoing investigations. The defense never sought in camera review. Without that, the issue was unpreserved for appellate review. Leverette … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, State constitution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on FL1: If trial court refuses to unseal SW affidavit, in camera review must be sought to preserve issue

NY: Requirement of electronic logging devices of hours trucks are driven is reasonable under NY Const.

Electronic logging devices required under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration adopted in New York survive a facial challenge. “We hold that the warrantless inspections authorized by the regulations fall within the administrative search exception to the warrant requirement and … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, State constitution | Comments Off on NY: Requirement of electronic logging devices of hours trucks are driven is reasonable under NY Const.

WA: Officer’s opening door for welfare check was minimal when he saw body in plain view

The warrantless entry into the home shared by the victim and defendant was justified because the officer’s concern for the victim was reasonable. She had not reported for work, she was not answering her phone, her car was parked in … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Officer’s opening door for welfare check was minimal when he saw body in plain view

E.D.N.Y.: Not responding to govt’s 4A response brief amounts to waiver

Not responding to the Fourth Amendment issues in post-hearing briefing was waiver. Defendant loses on the merits anyway. Defendant retrieved sham cocaine (replaced by CBP) in the avionics compartment of an American Airlines plane. He consented to the search of … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Not responding to govt’s 4A response brief amounts to waiver

MA: Horizontal collective knowledge requires officers communicate with each other

Horizontal collective knowledge in Massachusetts requires the officers communicate with each other and share information. Commonwealth v. Privette, 2023 Mass. LEXIS 86 (Mar. 28, 2023):

Posted in Collective knowledge, State constitution | Comments Off on MA: Horizontal collective knowledge requires officers communicate with each other

OH3: Threat to get a SW didn’t coerce consent where there was PC for one

Defendant was alleged to have consented to a blood draw in a DUI case. When he hesitated, the officer said that he’d get a search warrant if defendant didn’t go through with it. There’s a difference between the officer saying … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, State constitution, Voluntariness | Comments Off on OH3: Threat to get a SW didn’t coerce consent where there was PC for one

ID rejects “reasonable mistake of law” and Heien under state constitution; state’s exclusionary rule is broader

Idaho declines to adopt the “reasonable mistake of law” rule and suppresses a search incident to a warrantless arrest for a completed misdemeanor. The state’s exclusionary rule isn’t just to deter illegal police misconduct – it is considerably more, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness, State constitution | Comments Off on ID rejects “reasonable mistake of law” and Heien under state constitution; state’s exclusionary rule is broader

HI: Miranda warnings required whenever PC develops for arrest

“Miranda warnings are required by article I, section 10 of the Constitution of the State of Hawai’i when probable cause to arrest has developed. And in Hewitt’s case, contrary to the ICA’s conclusion, probable cause had developed before she was … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Custody, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on HI: Miranda warnings required whenever PC develops for arrest

WA: Stop to inquire of paying transit fare violated state constitution

Defendant’s freedom under the state constitution to not be interfered with in his private affairs was violated by a stop and inquiry whether he had paid a transit fare. He provided a false name that led to his prosecution for … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity, Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Stop to inquire of paying transit fare violated state constitution

VT: Realtime CSLI (“pinging”) requires a SW under state constitution

Realtime CSLI (“pinging”) requires a search warrant under the state constitution, following some states. That information is not regularly kept by cell phone providers, and the state has an interest in protecting that privacy interest. State v. Murphy, 2023 VT … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, State constitution, Uncategorized | Comments Off on VT: Realtime CSLI (“pinging”) requires a SW under state constitution

OH6: State could get a jury instruction that defendant refused to submit to a DNA search

The state could get a jury instruction that defendant refused to submit to a DNA search. State v. Roberts, 2023-Ohio-142, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 131 (6th Dist. Jan. 18, 2023). The facts in isolation may not show reasonable suspicion but … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OH6: State could get a jury instruction that defendant refused to submit to a DNA search

SC Const. search and seizure and privacy provision protects abortion rights; Idaho says theirs doesn’t

The state 1971 constitutional amendment recognizing a right to privacy was really enacting what the people always believed about privacy. It provides: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Prison and jail searches, State constitution, Strip search | Comments Off on SC Const. search and seizure and privacy provision protects abortion rights; Idaho says theirs doesn’t

Nevada recognizes a private right of action for violation of the state constitution’s search and seizure guarantee

Nevada recognizes a private right of action for violation of the state constitution’s search and seizure guarantee. Plaintiff sued in federal court for a strip search going into a prison that produced nothing and also resulted in her being barred … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Nexus, State constitution | Comments Off on Nevada recognizes a private right of action for violation of the state constitution’s search and seizure guarantee

DC: “Handcuffing is ordinarily improper in a Terry stop absent an objective safety concern.”

“Handcuffing is ordinarily improper in a Terry stop absent an objective safety concern. See United States v. Smith, 373 F. Supp. 3d 223, 241 (D.D.C. 2019); Haynes v. Minnehan, 14 F.4th 830, 835 n.4 (8th Cir. 2021) (‘[A]bsent an objective … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, State constitution | Comments Off on DC: “Handcuffing is ordinarily improper in a Terry stop absent an objective safety concern.”