Daily Archives: October 15, 2026

Volokh: How Should Flock Cameras Be Regulated Under the Fourth Amendment?

Volokh Conspiracy: How Should Flock Cameras Be Regulated Under the Fourth Amendment by Orin S. Kerr

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on Volokh: How Should Flock Cameras Be Regulated Under the Fourth Amendment?

D.P.R.: Mere possession of a car doesn’t show standing

Just having possession of a car doesn’t show standing. How did it come to be? United States v. Luna-Irizarry, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232412 (D.P.R. Oct. 8, 2026):

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Mere possession of a car doesn’t show standing

D.Kan.: Gun dislodged fleeing police dog wasn’t excludable, even if it was excessive force (which it wasn’t)

Siccing a police dog on a suspected armed and dangerous burglar that dislodge a Glock with a switch was not unreasonable. Even if it was excessive force, which it wasn’t, exclusion wouldn’t be the proper remedy. United States v. Wilhoite, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Gun dislodged fleeing police dog wasn’t excludable, even if it was excessive force (which it wasn’t)

S.D.Ill.: Witness’s memory failure on the stand at trial didn’t support a Franks challenge

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising a Franks challenge mid-trial when a participant in the search warrant process had a memory failure on the stand as to something. Offutt v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231418 (S.D. Ill. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Witness’s memory failure on the stand at trial didn’t support a Franks challenge

W.D.Pa.: SW for cell phone on def at time of drug arrest was particular

Defendant’s cell phone particularity objection to the warrant fails because it showed (1) crime involved, (2) ID’ed them as found on him at time with a gun and drugs, and (3) showed nexus. Also, the good faith exception would apply. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for cell phone on def at time of drug arrest was particular