Category Archives: Probable cause

E.D.N.Y.: Some assistance to foreign police under MLAT doesn’t require suppression

Defendants are accused to a cocaine conspiracy of trafficking from South America to Europe through the US. The government obtained information from European counties via MLAT, and whatever assistance they gave to help gather information didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Some assistance to foreign police under MLAT doesn’t require suppression

N.D.Ill.: Without seeing the video of the occurrence referred to in SW affidavit, court can’t find PC

The affidavit for warrant refers to a video of an occurrence, but, without seeing the video, the USMJ can’t decide probable cause for the warrant. Otherwise, it’s ratifying the officer’s conclusions, mentioning being a “rubber stamp.” In re Search of … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Without seeing the video of the occurrence referred to in SW affidavit, court can’t find PC

N.D.Okla.: “In the presence” of the officer for misdemeanor arrests is not a part of the common law

The “in the presence” of the officer for misdemeanor arrests is not a part of the common law, citing Woods v. City of Chicago, 234 F.3d 979, 995 (7th Cir. 2000). It is by statute or rule in various places. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Independent source, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: “In the presence” of the officer for misdemeanor arrests is not a part of the common law

DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application

Defendant was not denied confrontation of the CI who took photographs of his property used to get the search warrant. When the state offered them at trial, defendant successfully objected, so there was nothing to confront. State v. McCurdy, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application

LA: Forensic search of cell phone can occur any time before trial

The forensic search of a cell phone can occur anytime between seizure and trial and still be timely. State v. Lowry, 2025 La. LEXIS 1481 (La. Oct. 25, 2025). 2255 ineffective assistance of counsel challenge for Franks violation fails for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA: Forensic search of cell phone can occur any time before trial

S.D.N.Y.: Incomplete series for Netflix was subject of SW

Netflix contracted with defendant to make a series. When it fell through after paying him $44M, they believed they’d been defrauded. The search warrant for what had been completed of the series was potential evidence and properly sought under the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Inevitable discovery, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Incomplete series for Netflix was subject of SW

OH5: Oath or affirmation requirement satisfied by GFE

Even if the oath or affirmation technically fails here, the good faith exception saves the warrant. State v. Lucas, 2025-Ohio-4863, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 3605 (5th Dist. Oct. 22, 2025). “We conclude that the trial court properly denied the motion … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Oath or affirmation, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on OH5: Oath or affirmation requirement satisfied by GFE

CA5: A-C privilege review of seized email doesn’t have to be perfect

In this bank fraud case, the attorney-client privilege review of defendant’s email was “imperfect” but not so bad that the indictment should be dismissed. It clearly doesn’t rise to the level of “outrageous.” Yes, the review could have been done … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, E-mail, Privileges, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: A-C privilege review of seized email doesn’t have to be perfect

E.D.Ark.: There is no 4A claim by a dead person

There is no Fourth Amendment claim by a dead person. “Because the investigation failures and denial of access to the Courts are based on facts alleged to have occurred entirely after decedent’s death, Plaintiff cannot assert these claims either on … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: There is no 4A claim by a dead person

W.D.Ky.: No requirement cell phone search protocol be specified in the SW

There is no requirement in the Sixth Circuit for a cell phone search protocol to be specified in the search warrant. United States v. Lanham, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202782 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 14, 2025). There was probable cause defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: No requirement cell phone search protocol be specified in the SW

S.D.Ohio: No duty to verify an outstanding arrest warrant before execution

Search incident to an arrest for an outstanding warrant was valid. There was no duty to check first to see if it was possible the warrant had been recalled or quashed. United States v. Lockridge, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203313 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: No duty to verify an outstanding arrest warrant before execution

E.D.Ky.: If cell phone warrant is overbroad, remedy is to suppress the overbroad part, not all

“Assuming, without deciding, that the Cellphone Warrant was overbroad due to lack of a timeframe limitation, this finding would not mean that all evidence seized under the cellphone warrant is subject to suppression. The proper remedy is to suppress only … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: If cell phone warrant is overbroad, remedy is to suppress the overbroad part, not all

W.D.Wis.: Lack of info on CI’s credibility wasn’t material; PC shown otherwise

The affidavit for warrant omitted pertinent details about the CI’s credibility and apparent baggage, but it doesn’t matter: “And yet, the pertinent facts provided by Hample were corroborated by other information, including text messages, phone records, location tracking, and surveillance. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Lack of info on CI’s credibility wasn’t material; PC shown otherwise

OH1: With legalization of marijuana, the smell of marijuana is no longer probable cause in itself

With legalization of marijuana, the smell of marijuana is no longer probable cause in itself. “While the smell of marijuana remains a relevant factor under the totality of the circumstances to a probable-cause analysis, it is no longer sufficient, standing … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH1: With legalization of marijuana, the smell of marijuana is no longer probable cause in itself

FL2: The smell of marijuana alone is no longer PC but the GFE applies here

The smell of marijuana alone is no longer probable cause but the good faith exception applies here. Williams v. State, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 7375 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 1, 2025) (en banc):

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL2: The smell of marijuana alone is no longer PC but the GFE applies here

CO: In a civil case, legal justification for a warrantless search is an affirmative defense

“In a case of first impression, a division of the court of appeals holds that legal justification for a warrantless search is an affirmative defense that the defendant must prove in a civil action under section 13-21-131, C.R.S. 2025. The … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CO: In a civil case, legal justification for a warrantless search is an affirmative defense

WA: DV order of protection can include disarming respondent

A proven domestic violence order of protection can provide justification for the respondent to give up his firearms under the Fourth Amendment and state constitution. In re Domestic Violence Prot. Ord. For Hernandez, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 1953 (Sep. 30, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: DV order of protection can include disarming respondent

E.D.Wis.: Geofence warrant slightly different than Chatrie still in good faith

This geofence warrant was slightly different than Chatrie’s. Still, the good faith exception applies. “In this case, law enforcement acted pursuant to a warrant that was not so facially deficient that the executing officers could not reasonably presume it to … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, geofence, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Geofence warrant slightly different than Chatrie still in good faith

TX4: Bullet holes in truck justified its seizure for SW

Plain view of bullet holes in defendant’s truck justified its seizure and transport to police impound lot where it was searched with a warrant. Lee v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7569 (Tex. App. – San Antonio Sep. 30, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on TX4: Bullet holes in truck justified its seizure for SW

E.D.Mich.: Someone else’s search doesn’t affect defendant

Defendant has no standing to challenge the search of others that affected him, a theory rejected in Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 171-172 (1969). United States v. Phillips, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190766 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 26, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Someone else’s search doesn’t affect defendant