Category Archives: Waiver

OH6: Motion to suppress alleged stop was invalid, but at hearing def switched to lack of PC for search, and that’s waived by lack of notice to state

Defendant’s motion to suppress alleged the impropriety of the stop. At the suppression hearing, however, the defense expanded it to include a lack of probable cause for a car search. The state was not on notice by the motion, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Foreign searches, Waiver | Comments Off on OH6: Motion to suppress alleged stop was invalid, but at hearing def switched to lack of PC for search, and that’s waived by lack of notice to state

E.D.N.C.: Random stop at military base gate validly led to DUI

Military officers working the gate at Fort Bragg had reasonable suspicion defendant was driving under the influence when he was stopped for random inspection before entry into the base. It ripened to probable cause. United States v. Lock, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Military searches, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Random stop at military base gate validly led to DUI

CA10: Inconsistency in travel plans isn’t RS per se; officer has to see that they’re lying

Inconsistency in travel plans alone isn’t reasonable suspicion to extend a vehicle stop. The officer has to conclude that one of the occupants was lying about plans. “A trooper can reasonably suspect criminal activity when a driver and passenger lie … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: Inconsistency in travel plans isn’t RS per se; officer has to see that they’re lying

TX1: Motion to suppress after officer testified at trial not timely

Defense counsel’s motion to suppress coming during trial at the end of the officer’s testimony wasn’t timely. Brown v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 1014 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) Feb. 3, 2026)* (unpublished). An automobile exception search can … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, DNA, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on TX1: Motion to suppress after officer testified at trial not timely

D.S.D.: “Dismissal of an indictment is not an appropriate remedy for a Fourth Amendment violation.”

“Dismissal of an indictment is not an appropriate remedy for a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Chavez, 705 F.3d 381, 386 (8th Cir. 2013).” It may be for a due process violation. United States v. Pryor, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.D.: “Dismissal of an indictment is not an appropriate remedy for a Fourth Amendment violation.”

OH6: Search claim resolved in criminal case is collateral estoppel in forfeiture

This is a forfeiture after defendant lost his search claim in his criminal case. The search issue is res judicata or collateral estoppel in the forfeiture. State v. Pitts, 2026-Ohio-292 (6th Dist. Jan. 30, 2026). Defendant’s superseding indictment raising the … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on OH6: Search claim resolved in criminal case is collateral estoppel in forfeiture

AR: Asking for SW before opening the door is not obstructing governmental operations

Asking for a search warrant before opening the door is not obstructing governmental operations. The motion for directed verdict should have been granted. This is not active resistance. Keeton v. State, 2026 Ark. App. 53 (Jan. 28, 2026). The Heck … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AR: Asking for SW before opening the door is not obstructing governmental operations

VA: Refusal to comply with DNA warrant for 12 days was relevant evidence under 403

Defendant’s simple [nonaggressive] refusal to comply with a search warrant for his DNA for 12 days was admissible at trial. [There’s also a prior discussion that suggests harmless error.] Lee v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 32 (Jan. 13, 2026). … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Privileges, Waiver | Comments Off on VA: Refusal to comply with DNA warrant for 12 days was relevant evidence under 403

W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

The search warrant for a gun involved in shooting was not stale 11 days after the shooting. Firearms are durable and not consumables. United States v. Williams, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4950 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2026). The warrant for … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Staleness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

D.S.D.: No standing in employer’s laptop

2255 petitioner fails on standing to contest of search of this laptop. Based on all the court can see, including the PSR description, the laptop belonged to his employer, not him. All the electronic devices of the employer were seized. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.D.: No standing in employer’s laptop

D.N.H.: Late disclosed SW application doesn’t show “actual innocence”; “legal innocence” is different

Petitioner obtained his search warrant application years after he was convicted. His habeas is denied. He claims it shows he was actually innocent, but this is only potential legal innocence, not actual innocence, and there’s a difference. Davis v. Warden, … Continue reading →

Posted in Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Late disclosed SW application doesn’t show “actual innocence”; “legal innocence” is different

DE: Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is waiver with no plain error review

Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is waiver, and it will not be considered on plain error review, and for good reason. Swanson v. State, 2025 Del. LEXIS 504 (Dec. 31, 2025):

Posted in Motion to suppress, Waiver | Comments Off on DE: Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is waiver with no plain error review

TX3: Motion to suppress never ruled on is waived for appeal

Defendant filed a motion to suppress but didn’t get a hearing or ruling on it. Then, at trial, made a motion in limine but that didn’t preserve the lack of probable cause issue from the motion to suppress. It’s all … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Waiver | Comments Off on TX3: Motion to suppress never ruled on is waived for appeal

HI: Failure to argue PC at suppression hearing was waiver for appeal

Where the defense didn’t argue a lack of probable cause at the suppression hearing, that could not be raised on appeal. State v. Arbogast, 2025 Haw. App. LEXIS 617 (Dec. 23, 2025) (unpublished).* Defendant’s stop was reasonable and his spontaneous … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings, Waiver | Comments Off on HI: Failure to argue PC at suppression hearing was waiver for appeal

D.Minn.: Taking 10 minutes to review a SW affidavit doesn’t show magistrate not neutral and detached

The issuing judge taking ten minutes to review an affidavit for warrant does not show that he or she abandoned the role of a neutral and detached magistrate. [I can usually see probable cause in an affidavit in 30-45 seconds. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Taking 10 minutes to review a SW affidavit doesn’t show magistrate not neutral and detached

MD: State’s failure to litigate standing at suppression hearing is waiver

The state’s failure to litigate standing at the suppression hearing is its waiver. On the merits, the information failed to show probable cause via collective knowledge. Seizure of bloody clothing in a bag in the hallway outside the ER was … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on MD: State’s failure to litigate standing at suppression hearing is waiver

KS: KHP power for administrative searches of truck can’t be delegated to sheriffs

Under Kansas statute, only KHP officers can randomly stop regulated trucks for inspection, and it can’t be delegated to county sheriffs by an MOU. “There is no dispute here that regulation of commercial motor carriers triggers a substantial government interest.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Waiver | Comments Off on KS: KHP power for administrative searches of truck can’t be delegated to sheriffs

S.D.Fla.: 16 shot ShotSpotter alert confirmed by witnesses was exigency to enter curtilage

A ShotSpotter alert of 16 gunshots from the vicinity of defendant’s home confirmed by witnesses in a car leaving the area was justification for exigent entry onto the curtilage. “Since the addition of the omitted information does not disturb the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: 16 shot ShotSpotter alert confirmed by witnesses was exigency to enter curtilage

NY: The smell of a decomposing body in a Brooklyn apartment was plain smell for finding source

Defendant had no standing to contest the opening of an apartment refrigerator finding a decapitated body. This was plain smell. The officers could smell the decomposing body, and that was enough to open the refrigerator door. People v. McGee, 2025 … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches, Informant hearsay, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on NY: The smell of a decomposing body in a Brooklyn apartment was plain smell for finding source

DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application

Defendant was not denied confrontation of the CI who took photographs of his property used to get the search warrant. When the state offered them at trial, defendant successfully objected, so there was nothing to confront. State v. McCurdy, 2025 … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application