Author Archives: Hall

E.D.Cal.: Def’s arrest based on drunkenness was without PC

It’s clear from the testimony that the officer intended to arrest defendant, but it was without probable cause that he was so drunk he was a danger. The motion to suppress is granted, but the grounds change slightly on the … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Def’s arrest based on drunkenness was without PC

E.D.Tex.: Corporate Transparency Act enjoined, but 4A claim as yet unresolved

On the balance of equities, the Eastern District of Texas enjoins the Corporate Transparency Act going into effect January 1, 2025. “[T]he CTA requires a vast array of companies to disclose otherwise private stakeholder information to FinCEN. See 31 U.S.C. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Corporate Transparency Act enjoined, but 4A claim as yet unresolved

Hell Gate: 83 Percent of ShotSpotter Alerts Might Not Have Been Gunfire at All

Hell Gate: 83 Percent of ShotSpotter Alerts Might Not Have Been Gunfire at All by Nick Pinto (“ShotSpotter, the gunshot detection system used by the NYPD since 2015, doesn’t work—if what you mean by ‘work’ is ‘accurately alert police to … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Hell Gate: 83 Percent of ShotSpotter Alerts Might Not Have Been Gunfire at All

CA8: Use of SWAT team for no-knock drug warrant not clearly established as unreasonable

The use of the SWAT team to execute a no-knock drug warrant was not clearly established to be unreasonable in 2017 when this happened. Davis v. City of Little Rock, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30415 (8th Cir. Dec. 3, 2024):

Posted in Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: Use of SWAT team for no-knock drug warrant not clearly established as unreasonable

D.D.C.: Multiple counts of things seized under SW not severed

In a motion to sever counts for trial, it was significant that the stuff was seized under the same search warrant. United States v. Lewis, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217086 (D.D.C. Dec. 2, 2024). There was probable cause and nexus … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Multiple counts of things seized under SW not severed

ID: City ordinance on trash collection did not create a REP in trash from police taking it

City ordinance on trash collection did not create a reasonable expectation of privacy in trash from police taking it for investigative purposes. State v. Pulizzi, 2024 Ida. LEXIS 132 (Nov. 29, 2024). The probation officer had a wealth of reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on ID: City ordinance on trash collection did not create a REP in trash from police taking it

HI: TSA check of powdery substance in luggage seen on x-ray was reasonable

TSA’s x-raying baggage at the Honolulu airport produced an unknown substance in a Ziploc bag that TSA could check to be sure it wasn’t explosives for an IED or other harmful thing. Here, it produced drugs, and the search was … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches | Comments Off on HI: TSA check of powdery substance in luggage seen on x-ray was reasonable

MI: Leatherman tool on belt could be considered weapon for frisk

Defendant was well-known to be a meth abuser, and when he was stopped for a traffic offense and had a Leatherman tool on him, that could be considered usable as a weapon. People v. Babcock, 2024 Mich. App. LEXIS 9506 … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: Leatherman tool on belt could be considered weapon for frisk

Leftovers

2255 petitioner fails to show grounds for a CoA from his search claims, without telling us the rationale. United States v. Renteria, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30239 (5th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024).* Defendant’s stop and frisk was without reasonable suspicion. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk, Strip search | Comments Off on Leftovers

CA11: No prejudice for failing to file motion to suppress drug def was acquitted of

2254 petitioner can’t show prejudice from defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress cocaine when he was acquitted of that charge. Zayas-Acosta v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30236 (11th Cir. Nov. 27, 2024). Challenge … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA11: No prejudice for failing to file motion to suppress drug def was acquitted of

FL6: Def confesses error that his motion to suppress abandoned property shouldn’t have been granted

Defendant moved to suppress something he threw away in flight from the police, and the trial court granted it. On appeal, he confesses error that it was abandoned. Reversed. State v. Howard, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 9246 (Fla. 6th DCA … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on FL6: Def confesses error that his motion to suppress abandoned property shouldn’t have been granted

WaPo: TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: What’s better for price and privacy?

WaPo: TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: What’s better for price and privacy? by Tatum Hunter (“Clear saves you time at the airport. Just make sure to read the fine print.” “Airport security is, by nature, at odds with individual privacy. The … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: What’s better for price and privacy?

Debra Cassens Weiss, Are police responsible for damaging home to oust suspect? Sotomayor and Gorsuch see important issue

Debra Cassens Weiss, Are police responsible for damaging home to oust suspect? Sotomayor and Gorsuch see important issue (ABAJ Nov. 26, 2024) (“The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to decide whether police must compensate a Texas homeowner for damages … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Debra Cassens Weiss, Are police responsible for damaging home to oust suspect? Sotomayor and Gorsuch see important issue

D.Nev.: In a § 242 prosecution, defense expert can’t testify to PC

In a § 242 prosecution for violating civil rights, the defense proposed expert is barred from opinion on whether probable cause existed for the arrest. “Whether a given set of facts constitutes probable cause to arrest or charge for a … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion, Pretext, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Nev.: In a § 242 prosecution, defense expert can’t testify to PC

CA10: Gant permits search for DL in car when def fails to identify himself

Gant search incident permits a search for a driver’s real driver’s license in a car when he fails to properly identify himself. United States v. Pinder, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29995 (10th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024). Complaining generally about a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Search incident | Comments Off on CA10: Gant permits search for DL in car when def fails to identify himself

D.Or.: Taking iPhone 6 apart and putting new firmware to make it work wasn’t a “search” for information

Taking an iPhone 6 apart, putting it back together, and installing new firmware to make it work was not a “search” because that process was not to obtain information. [Well, that was the ultimate goal, wasn’t it?] United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on D.Or.: Taking iPhone 6 apart and putting new firmware to make it work wasn’t a “search” for information

CA8: Pro se def’s standby counsel not ineffective at suppression hearing; not counsel’s role

Defendant chose to go pro se at the suppression hearing, grudgingly accepting standby counsel. After the motion to suppress was denied, he claimed ineffective assistance by standby counsel for not doing more. But that’s not standby counsel’s role. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA8: Pro se def’s standby counsel not ineffective at suppression hearing; not counsel’s role

WY: Courthouse entry search valid under “special needs”

Defendant entered a courthouse, and the metal detector went off on a small can on him which he opened on request revealing meth. These searches are valid as “special needs.” Russell v. State, 2024 WY 126, 2024 Wyo. LEXIS 128 … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Special needs | Comments Off on WY: Courthouse entry search valid under “special needs”

OH12: Stop for riding bicycle in center of road led to RS for frisk

Defendant’s stop was for riding a bicycle in the center of the road, but when finally stopped, he had a large sheathed knife on him, and that justified a frisk. State v. Hayes, 2024-Ohio-5545 (12th Dist. Nov. 25, 2024).* “Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OH12: Stop for riding bicycle in center of road led to RS for frisk

TX1: GPS installed by dealer in a used car was owned by dealer and was not comparable to CSLI

Defendant bought a used car that the dealer had GPS installed in if necessary to recover it. The police accessed that information without a warrant to connect him to a murder. The contract for the vehicle told defendant about the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, GPS / Tracking Data, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on TX1: GPS installed by dealer in a used car was owned by dealer and was not comparable to CSLI