Author Archives: Hall

CA8: Inventory was reasonable despite officer expecting to find drugs

There was reasonable suspicion for defendants’ stop. The subsequent inventory was facially valid because it followed departmental policy. “That Detective Parks happened upon contraband in the course of this search does not transform an otherwise valid inventory search into a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Inventory | Comments Off on CA8: Inventory was reasonable despite officer expecting to find drugs

S.D.Fla.: Subject matter of search particularized it by time

The search warrant was particular and not overbroad. The subject matter of the investigation sufficiently limited the search even though time wasn’t otherwise specified. United States v. Hugger, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123081 (S.D. Fla. July 12, 2022):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Subject matter of search particularized it by time

W.D.Wis.: No REP in one’s Facebook posts, even when accessed by a “ghost” account

A law enforcement officer’s creation of a ghost Facebook account to access defendant’s private pages violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Randall, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122615 (W.D. Wis. July 12, 2022), and more elaborate than I … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Social media warrants | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: No REP in one’s Facebook posts, even when accessed by a “ghost” account

CA7: The question is only whether the officer reasonably believed def violated the law, not whether def did

“‘[T]he question … is whether [the officer] reasonably believed that he saw a traffic violation, not whether [the defendant] actually violated the [law].’ Cole, 21 F.4th at 428.” United States v. Yang, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 19125 (7th Cir. July … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Foreign searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: The question is only whether the officer reasonably believed def violated the law, not whether def did

Politico: Amazon gave Ring videos to police without owners’ permission

Politico: Amazon gave Ring videos to police without owners’ permission by Alfred Ng (“The revelation highlights the many ways that police can get footage from Ring doorbells, and how often it happens without consent.”)

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Politico: Amazon gave Ring videos to police without owners’ permission

CA7: The question is not whether def committed a traffic violation, it’s whether the officer reasonably believed he did

“‘[T]he question … is whether [the officer] reasonably believed that he saw a traffic violation, not whether [the defendant] actually violated the [law].’ Cole, 21 F.4th at 428.” United States v. Yang, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 19125 (7th Cir. July … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Foreign searches, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: The question is not whether def committed a traffic violation, it’s whether the officer reasonably believed he did

D.Neb.: Being with known gang members was RS here

Association with known gang members was reasonable suspicion when defendant was with them. “True, the task force did not have information that Defendant himself was affiliated with a gang or otherwise had a criminal history involving violence. But, given his … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Being with known gang members was RS here

D.Ariz.: Pre-Carpenter CSLI required compliance with SCA and here state officers didn’t

The government pleads the CSLI order was pre-Carpenter and thus subject to the good faith exception. The court finds, however, that the Stored Communications Act was not complied with and the government does not get the benefit of the good … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Pre-Carpenter CSLI required compliance with SCA and here state officers didn’t

OH12: No const’l requirement to call owner before vehicle impoundment

Neither the federal nor state constitution require an officer to call the owner of a car to come and get it off a parking lot rather than it be towed when the driver is arrested. State v. Edwards, 2022-Ohio-2384, 2022 … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Voluntariness | Comments Off on OH12: No const’l requirement to call owner before vehicle impoundment

E.D.Ark.: Probation officer conducting home visit can smell around the door for drug use

A probation officer at defendant’s house for a home visit could smell around the door, and, here, the smell of marijuana being used inside was evident. That was not unreasonable. United States v. Toney, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120895 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Probation officer conducting home visit can smell around the door for drug use

NY Bronx: SDT for text message information was overbroad; SW should be sought instead

The court concludes a subpoena duces tecum to T-Mobile for text message information was overbroad. The court recommends the state apply for a search warrant instead. People v. Nelson, 2022 NY Slip Op 50630(U), 2022 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2968 (Bronx … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Overbreadth, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on NY Bronx: SDT for text message information was overbroad; SW should be sought instead

N.D.Ind.: USMJ’s finding stop was racially motivated is irrelevant and rejected

The USMJ’s finding that the stop was racially motivated is rejected. Reviewing the dashcam video, the stop was clearly justified for a traffic offense, and that’s all that was legally required. United States v. Crawford, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120634 … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: USMJ’s finding stop was racially motivated is irrelevant and rejected

CA4: Asking motorist whether he is armed relates to officer safety

Asking motorist whether he is armed relates to officer safety, and it is reasonable during a stop. United States v. Racer, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 18664 (4th Cir. July 7, 2022). Dog sniff outside an apartment door didn’t violate any … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA4: Asking motorist whether he is armed relates to officer safety

S.D.N.Y.: Even illegally seized evidence could be used at sentencing

Defendant’s claim of illegal search is moot for the trial because the government says it’s not using it. It could, however, come up at sentencing. “In United States v. Tejada, the Second Circuit held that ‘[a]bsent a showing that officers … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Inventory, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Even illegally seized evidence could be used at sentencing

Cal.6: Calling drug dog before the stop helped show the stop was prolonged for dog’s arrival

The officer unreasonably prolonged the stop for the arrival of the drug dog. While subjective intentions aren’t determinative under Whren, here the officer called for the drug dog before the stop even happened. People v. Ayon, 2022 Cal. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Cal.6: Calling drug dog before the stop helped show the stop was prolonged for dog’s arrival

CA6 & FL1: Fact hemp is legal doesn’t make smell of MJ lack PC

The fact that hemp was legal doesn’t make the smell like marijuana a lack of probable cause. United States v. McCallister, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 18642 (6th Cir. July 7, 2022) (people in a park); Hatcher v. State, 2022 Fla. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA6 & FL1: Fact hemp is legal doesn’t make smell of MJ lack PC

N.D.Ohio: Received CP rarely gets stale

The offense of receiving child pornography rarely gets stale, and here it didn’t. Here it was images from a young girl the defendant sought. United States v. Brackman, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118020 (N.D. Ohio July 5, 2022)*:

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Received CP rarely gets stale

CA8: Omission of a fact not yet known is not a Franks violation

A detective’s omission of a critical fact that was not yet known is not a Franks violation. “What is undisputed, at least at this point, is that Detective Bowles did not actually know that the fire captain had described the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA8: Omission of a fact not yet known is not a Franks violation

CA1: Voluntary act after unreasonable stop made evidence admissible

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s seizure on the totality. But, “Sierra-Ayala’s intervening volitional act, in the absence of exploitative behavior by López-Maysonet, renders the discovery of the drugs sufficiently attenuated so as to dissipate the taint of the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA1: Voluntary act after unreasonable stop made evidence admissible

NJ: Refusal of a frisk without RS does not add to RS

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop. People who live in a “high crime area” do not have lesser constitutional protection. The facts here just didn’t support a frisk, and he had a right to refuse one, and that … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NJ: Refusal of a frisk without RS does not add to RS