N.D.Ill.: Court approves SW for electronic devices believed connected to counterfeiting offenses in SW for home

“The government has presented an application for a warrant to search a townhome for evidence of trafficking in counterfeit United States currency. Among the items identified by the government for search and seizure are electronic devices located in the premises. More specifically, the government’s application seeks to seize electronic devices in the premises that are connected to the subject offense or in the possession of the target of the offense. The Court has determined that this limitation on the scope of the seizure of electronic devices is consistent with the Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, and in particular, Riley v. California, …, and thus has authorized the warrant. The Court issues this opinion to explain the reasons why it has authorized a warrant with this limitation.” In re Search Warrant Application for the Search of a Townhome Unit, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68652 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 20, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Court approves SW for electronic devices believed connected to counterfeiting offenses in SW for home

OH12: Def was detained without RS and search for arrest on outstanding warrant should have been suppressed

Defendant was detained by three officers and told to wait in her van while one ran her name. The detention lacked reasonable suspicion, and search incident to the arrest for an outstanding warrant was unreasonable and should have been suppressed. (Strieff not cited.). State v. Keating, 2020-Ohio-2770, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1745 (12th Dist. May 4, 2020) (2-1). As to alternative grounds (e.g., right result, wrong reason), the court said:

Continue reading →
Posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH12: Def was detained without RS and search for arrest on outstanding warrant should have been suppressed

CA5: PC to search and seize doesn’t require that a crime actually have been committed

Plaintiff’s argument that there was no gambling crime for a search to occur is “fantasy” — the question is probable cause to believe a crime occurred, not whether one actually did. Lucky Tunes #3 LLC v. Smith, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 14130 (5th Cir. May 1, 2020) (the court was a little harsh on plaintiff’s counsel):

Continue reading →
Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on CA5: PC to search and seize doesn’t require that a crime actually have been committed

CA7: Anonymous call of suspicious person lacked corroboration and wasn’t RS

This anonymous tip revealed nothing but identifying characteristics, and it didn’t show reasonable suspicion. “Additionally, the tip itself contained no further indicia of the informant’s reliability. It also offered nothing but a barebones description of the suspect: the caller identified the race (Hispanic), sex (male), and dress (black sweater, hat, and bag). What limited details the caller did supply fell short of describing Howell with significant accuracy. Above all else, the call mentioned a bag, which Howell did not have, and described Howell, who is white, as appearing Hispanic.” United States v. Howell, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 14142 (7th Cir. May 4, 2020).

An apartment maintenance man was sent in by his supervisor, and the testimony “demonstrates that Mr. Bowie’s superiors wanted him to look for ‘illegal things,’ like drugs, ‘that are not allowed on our property.’ … A search by a private individual to further the interests of a property manager does not implicate Fourth Amendment concerns.” United States v. McArthur, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77628 (M.D. Ala. May 4, 2020).

Posted in Informant hearsay, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Anonymous call of suspicious person lacked corroboration and wasn’t RS

ID: Def’s probationary status was admissible at trial to show context for probation search, not as propensity evidence

The fact defendant was on probation was admissible at trial, not as propensity evidence, but to show context for the probation search and why defendant’s underwear was searched. State v. Jones, 2020 Ida. LEXIS 95 (May 4, 2020).

Automatic license plate recognition technology used by the US Postal Inspection Service to locate defendant’s rented vehicle outside the rental period infringed on no reasonable expectation of privacy under Carpenter. United States v. Yang, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 14168 (9th Cir. May 4, 2020).

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on ID: Def’s probationary status was admissible at trial to show context for probation search, not as propensity evidence

E.D.Ky.: Fire chief could consent to search of dept. owned laptop in possession of a Lt. (his son)

Defendant was a lieutenant in the fire department, and his father was the chief. He was using a city owned laptop. After he was arrested for exposing himself in a Walmart bathroom, dad had the apparent and actual authority to consent to search of the city owned computer as the fire chief. The fact defendant had possession and took it home everyday didn’t answer the ultimate question of actual control over the computer. United States v. England, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77986 (E.D. Ky. May 4, 2020).

Officers had probable cause defendant possessed heroin, and searched his shoe incident to arrest, finding a pill. The search incident was unreasonable. State v. Blythe, 2020 Ida. LEXIS 94 (May 4, 2020).

Posted in Apparent authority, Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Fire chief could consent to search of dept. owned laptop in possession of a Lt. (his son)

reason.com: How to Track COVID-19 Without Mass Surveillance

reason.com: How to Track COVID-19 Without Mass Surveillance by Zach Weissmueller (“Apple and Google’s Bluetooth-based app would reportedly be voluntary and anonymous. Privacy advocates say we should accept nothing less.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on reason.com: How to Track COVID-19 Without Mass Surveillance

E.D.Ky.: Ambiguities in affidavit for SW not a Franks violation

Alleged ambiguities in the affidavit for the search warrant didn’t show a Franks violation where there clearly was probable cause. United States v. Jenkins, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69247 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 21, 2020).

A 911 call from a cell phone captures the number and makes the citizen informant identified and, thus, more reliable. Finding defendant passed out in the car also supported the officer’s actions under the community caretaking function. State v. Clark, 2020 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 273 (Apr. 21, 2020).

Reasonable suspicion supported this 51 minute detention waiting for the nearest drug dog. United States v. Orozco-Rivas, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 12703 (10th Cir. Apr. 21, 2020).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Ambiguities in affidavit for SW not a Franks violation

E.D.Mich.: Backpack in vehicle was subject to frisk under Terry

Search of defendant’s backpack in a vehicle was justified by reasonable suspicion under Terry it contained a weapon. Alternatively, the backpack search could have been permitted under inventory. United States v. McGinnist, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69325 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 20, 2020).

Illegal backing justified a stop on reasonable suspicion, and the proof in the officer’s mind doesn’t have to be substantial. United States v. Mansaw, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69337 (D. Kan. Apr. 20, 2020).

Excessive force claims are governed by the Fourth Amendment, not the Fourteenth Amendment. Real v. Perry, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 12723 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2020); Jeffers v. Lyons, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 14203 (4th Cir. May 4, 2020).

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Backpack in vehicle was subject to frisk under Terry

D.Colo.: DEA subpoena for records of two pharmacies is enforced

The DEA’s subpoena to the Board of Pharmacy for controlled substances prescriptions for two pharmacies was reasonable and within the DEA’s jurisdiction. It is enforced. United States DOJ v. Colorado Bd. of Pharmacy, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69726 (D. Colo. Apr. 21, 2020).

CSLI obtained under the SCA in 2015 was admissible under the Krull good faith exception under M.R.E. 311(c)(4). United States v. Carter, 2020 CAAF LEXIS 239 (C.A. A.F. Apr. 29, 2020).

On the totality, defendant consented in writing to BAC analysis. State v. Degarmo, 305 Neb. 680 (May 1, 2020).

Posted in Cell site location information, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.Colo.: DEA subpoena for records of two pharmacies is enforced

CA6: No direct evidence of nexus required where a drug trafficker’s home is ID’d and he operates from there

“In fact, we have even gone so far to determine the existence of ‘a nexus between a defendant’s residence and illegal drug activity with no facts indicating that the defendant was dealing drugs from his residence.’ McCoy, 905 F.3d at 418 (emphasis added). Instead, we determined that a ‘defendant’s record of past drug convictions coupled with recent, reliable evidence of drug activity’ is sufficient to establish the nexus. Id.; see also United States v. Miggins, 302 F.3d 384, 393 (6th Cir. 2002) (finding probable cause existed to support search of defendant’s residence based on affidavit’s outlining of defendant’s prior cocaine-related convictions coupled with officers’ same-day observations of him signing for a package containing a large amount of cocaine delivered at someone else’s residence).” United States v. Sumlin, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 12744 (6th Cir. Apr. 21, 2020).

“Jenkins’s home. And Chadwell admitted at the traffic stop that he had obtained his pills from Jenkins and that he had just driven from Jenkins’s residence. Thus, the evidence here goes beyond the legally permissible inference that drug traffickers generally store drugs in their homes. The issuing judge had more than a ‘substantial basis’ for finding the affidavit established probable cause.” United States v. Jenkins, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69551 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 11, 2020), adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69247 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 21, 2020).*

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: No direct evidence of nexus required where a drug trafficker’s home is ID’d and he operates from there

E.D.Tenn.: Stop should have been completed in six minutes, not the 17 it took for dog to arrive; suppressed for no RS to continue it

Defendant’s stop was unjustified for speeding according to the dashcam. Then, the officer prolonged the stop to 17 minutes for a drug dog to arrive. The stop reasonably should have been completed in six minutes. United States v. Hayes, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71818 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 21, 2020), adopted, United States v. Hayes, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69908 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 21, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Stop should have been completed in six minutes, not the 17 it took for dog to arrive; suppressed for no RS to continue it

PA: Because CA police agreed to question a potential suspect in a PA murder, they didn’t become “agents” of PA

A murder occurred in Pennsylvania in 2002. A person with knowledge of the murder had moved to San Bernardino, California. Pennsylvania authorities called California and emailed reports on the murder. The California authorities undertook to interrogate defendant, which she agreed to, over a couple of days both at the police station and at her home. Under basic agency principles, the California police were not “agents” of the Pennsylvania State Police. “In addition and as discussed below, unlike in Dembo, here, the Pennsylvania State Police did not direct the mechanics of the California officers’ interviews.” Commonwealth v. Britton, 2020 Pa. LEXIS 2202 (Apr. 22, 2020).

Florida is a two-party consent state for recordings of conversations. When the recording happened at McGill Air Force Base, it was a federal enclave and the statute did not apply. Moreover, this is a case in federal court, and state law doesn’t control admissibility of evidence there. United States v. Boling, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69941 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 2, 2020), adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69245 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 21, 2020).

Posted in Conflict of laws | Comments Off on PA: Because CA police agreed to question a potential suspect in a PA murder, they didn’t become “agents” of PA

AR: Error in officers’ testimony as to place actually searched was properly excluded at trial as potentially confusing where it was clearly def’s place

Police confusion at trial as to the address actually searched wasn’t relevant, and the trial court didn’t abuse its discretion in foreclosing questions about that for confusion of the issues. “But his argument ignores the undisputed proof that the drugs and other contraband were found in the trailer that he was occupying–regardless of its physical, numerical address–at the time the search warrant was executed.” Kellensworth v. State, 2020 Ark. App. 249, 2020 Ark. App. LEXIS 282 (Apr. 22, 2020).

The warrantless blood draw at the hospital of defendant in a coma after a car accident was valid. State v. Miller, 2020 La. App. LEXIS 551 (La. App. 2 Cir. Apr. 22, 2020).

The state failed to show exigency for dispensing with a search warrant for defendant’s blood where it was possible he could have given a breath sample, and that wasn’t explored. Commonwealth v. Trahey, 2020 Pa. LEXIS 2230 (Apr. 22, 2020).

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on AR: Error in officers’ testimony as to place actually searched was properly excluded at trial as potentially confusing where it was clearly def’s place

CA4: Search incident of backpack of handcuffed def still reasonable

Despite his being handcuffed, a search incident of defendant’s backpack was reasonable because he could still try to access it. (First holding was abandonment for disavowing the backpack). United States v. Ferebee, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 12940 (4th Cir. Apr. 22, 2020).

A drug dog’s nose touching the storage unit’s door wasn’t a search. United States v. Kimmell, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70493 (D. Nev. Apr. 22, 2020).

The bodycam video makes it obvious defendant would not feel free to terminate the encounter with the police, so he was seized. United States v. Alvarez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70389 (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2020).*

Posted in Dog sniff, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: Search incident of backpack of handcuffed def still reasonable

KY: Detaining bystanders to facilitate the arrest of one was reasonable

State case law already permits officers to detain bystanders for a reasonable period for officer safety in execution of search warrants. The court adopts the Sixth Circuit rule and extends it to arrest warrants, too. “We hold that detaining Constant in the apartment for the purpose of streamlining B.P.’s arrest was valid and in keeping with federal precedent. Summers, 452 U.S. at 697-98 …” Constant v. Commonwealth, 2020 Ky. App. LEXIS 47 (Apr. 24, 2020).

The search warrant that found a video in defendant’s text messages was valid despite the search warrant not specifically mentioning cell phones in the body but in an attachment. United States v. Vetri, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 13068 (3d Cir. Apr. 23, 2020).

A cracked windshield didn’t support a dog sniff under Oregon law. State v. Sherriff, 303 Ore. App. 638, 2020 Ore. App. LEXIS 541 (Apr. 22, 2020).

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Particularity | Comments Off on KY: Detaining bystanders to facilitate the arrest of one was reasonable

D.Utah: Dog handler’s subjective belief dog alerted unreasonable

The dog handler’s subjective belief that his drug dog alerted is inadequate for a search of a person’s car. United States v. Jordan, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71048 (D. Utah Apr. 21, 2020):

Continue reading →
Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Utah: Dog handler’s subjective belief dog alerted unreasonable

TX2: SW for seizure of blood includes the ability to analyze it

It is well settled in Texas that a search warrant for blood in a DUI case includes the ability to analyze it. Jacobson v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 3447 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth Apr. 23, 2020).

Defendant’s CSLI issue was moot where the trial court sustained the warrant on its sufficiency and probable cause, and defendant didn’t challenge that on appeal. Thomas v. State, 2020 Ark. 354, 2020 Ark. LEXIS 147 (Apr. 23, 2020).

Defendant was held at Customs for five hours and questioned without Miranda warnings. He was in custody and should have been Mirandized. State v. Escalante, 2020 Wash. LEXIS 247 (Apr. 23, 2020).

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Scope of search, Standards of review | Comments Off on TX2: SW for seizure of blood includes the ability to analyze it

IN: Arrival of drug dog while ticket being written didn’t extend stop

The dog arrived at defendant’s traffic stop while the information was being entered into the traffic ticket program in the police car’s computer, so the dog sniff did not prolong the stop under the Fourth Amendment. Separately considering the state constitution, the court comes to the same conclusion. Thayer v. State, 2020 Ind. App. LEXIS 161 (Apr. 23, 2020).

Defendants are permitted to issue a Rule 17 subpoena to gather information from NCIC to show that vehicle VIN information was obtained by officers prior to the search warrant. The government argues that they lack standing on that issue, but the court permits them to look to attempt to controvert the search warrant. United States v. Craig, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71833 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 23, 2020).

Defendant’s arrest for a suspected nuisance violation led to find an outstanding warrant for a probation violation. This was attenuation under Strieff. United States v. Chew, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 13217 (9th Cir. Apr. 24, 2020).*

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IN: Arrival of drug dog while ticket being written didn’t extend stop

CA6: One day detention without finding of PC valid under Gerstein and Riverside

Plaintiffs’ one day detention without a finding of probable cause failed to state a claim under Gerstein and County of Riverside. That is still presumptively reasonable. Cox v. City of Jackson, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 13124 (6th Cir. Apr. 22, 2020) (the case also involves a Heck issue):

Continue reading →
Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA6: One day detention without finding of PC valid under Gerstein and Riverside