CA8: In a traffic stop, the passenger can be ordered to stay in the car or get out for officer safety

Defendant passenger’s detention was lawful when the car was stopped because of a warrant on the owner-driver. Being ordered into the car was also reasonable for officer safety. United States v. Negrete, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 30736 (8th Cir. Oct. 8, 2026).

Officers had probable cause but no exigency for a warrantless entry into defendant’s apartment. Animals were unattended, defendant hadn’t been seen in days, and urine and feces was all they could smell, not dead animals. Therefore, entry suppressed. People v Footman, 2026 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 14222 (Bronx Co. Sep. 18, 2026).*

There was probable cause for a stalking warrant against plaintiff, including his planting a GPS device on the stalkee’s car. Everett v. McCall, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 30696 (11th Cir. Oct. 7, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Emergency / exigency, GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.