CA11: Wrong-house raid suit barred by FTCA

Supposedly relying on a personal GPS device, the FBI SWAT team raided the wrong house, three houses from the target location and on a different street. The FTCA suit is barred under the discretionary function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act. The officer, however, does not get qualified immunity on his separate claim. Martin v. United States, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 30717 (11th Cir. Oct. 7, 2026) (an example of hard cases make bad law):

We therefore conclude that, under our precedent, the plaintiffs’ FTCA claims are based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function” by a federal government employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a). In the end, “the power to waive the federal government’s immunity is Congress'[ ] prerogative, not ours[.]” Dep’t of Agric. Rural Dev. Rural Hous. Serv. v. Kirtz, 601 U.S. 42, 48 (2024). We, as a three-judge panel, cannot contort or disregard our precedents in Shivers and in Mesa to provide Mr. Cliatt, Ms. Martin, or her son with recourse under the FTCA.

This entry was posted in Federal Tort Claims Act, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.