S.D.Ind.: Drone use that didn’t go over curtilage was reasonable

The use of a drone to surveil plaintiffs’ home from a distance in a child welfare case was not unreasonable. The drone didn’t fly over the house or curtilage, and the police were concerned plaintiffs had a “small arsenal” and could use it. Dircks v. Barnes, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128862 (S.D. Ind. July 26, 2023):

Continue reading →
Posted in Drones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Drone use that didn’t go over curtilage was reasonable

CA10: Civil remedy for violation of Posse Comitatus Act, not exclusion

The remedy for a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act is civil, not exclusion. United States v. King, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 19052 (10th Cir. July 25, 2023) (denying COA).

“On the whole, the factors outlined in Chavez provide mixed support for the Concerned Citizen’s reliability. However, as addressed supra pp. 17-18, even viewing the Concerned Citizen as reliable, the incongruity between the Concerned Citizen’s description and Mr. Ramirez’s presentation undercuts the existence of reasonable suspicion. In other words, while the Concerned Citizen may have been reliable, the description he provided did not match the person whom Sergeant Mares detained. In comparison, while the information the father supplied fit Mr. Ramirez’s appearance and location, the father-who had no sustained in-person contact with officers and shared information only through his son-was even less reliable than his son, undermining the reliability of those reports. Under the totality of the circumstances, the incongruity between the Concerned Citizen’s report and Mr. Ramirez’s appearance as well as the father’s minimal reliability establish that Sergeant Mares lacked reasonable suspicion to detain Mr. Ramirez.” United States v. Ramirez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127057 (D.N.M. July 17, 2023).*

Any motion to suppress would have failed. There was plenty of probable cause. Williams v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127833 (D. N.J. July 24, 2023).*

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA10: Civil remedy for violation of Posse Comitatus Act, not exclusion

Cal.3: PC to search passenger compartment for gun didn’t extend to the trunk

Officers had probable cause to search defendant’s passenger compartment for a firearm. When the gun wasn’t found there, the officer searched the trunk, finding it. The probable cause, however, did not extend to the trunk. People v. Leal, 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 563 (3d Dist. July 25, 2023).

“We conclude that Littlejohn failed to make the required substantial preliminary showing, instead relying only on conclusory allegations of falsity.” United States v. Littlejohn, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 18935 (4th Cir. July 25, 2023).*

“The Affidavit establishes probable cause. It describes Hayes—a known drug supplier—speaking with Peoples, immediately traveling to a place where he stores drugs, then immediately traveling to Peoples’s house.” That was nexus. United States v. Peoples, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126959 (E.D. Mich. July 24, 2023).*

Driving with an open container and a visible firearm would be reasonable suspicion in Michigan. United States v. Nailor, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126967 (E.D. Mich. July 24, 2023).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on Cal.3: PC to search passenger compartment for gun didn’t extend to the trunk

CA4: Not clearly established that VA DOC can’t drug test a Telecommunications Network Coordinator

Qualified immunity applies to the Virginia DOC directing a drug test of a Telecommunications Network Coordinator. “After VDOC fired Garrett for declining a random drug test, Garrett sued, alleging that VDOC employees violated his Fourth Amendment rights by applying VDOC’s drug testing policy to him. The defendants asserted qualified immunity and moved to dismiss. The district court denied the motion, concluding that general constitutional principles clearly establish Garrett’s right to be free from suspicionless drug testing. We disagree. Applying the correct standard, the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.” Garrett v. Clarke, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 18946 (4th Cir. July 25, 2023):

Continue reading →
Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Not clearly established that VA DOC can’t drug test a Telecommunications Network Coordinator

D.D.C.: SEC admin subpoena for law firm cyberattack was narrowed to only affected clients

Covington & Burling was the target of a cyberattack, and the SEC investigated. It wanted the names of all affected clients, but C&B resisted, seeking narrower disclosure. The law firm agreed that only certain affected clients should be disclosed, and the SEC agrees to the narrowing. SEC v. Covington & Burling, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127205 (D.D.C. July 24, 2023):

Continue reading →
Posted in Administrative search, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: SEC admin subpoena for law firm cyberattack was narrowed to only affected clients

E.D.Wis.: Late disclosed information justified the late filing of the motion to suppress

Late disclosed information justified the late filing of the motion to suppress. But, it still loses on the merits. United States v. Love, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126671 (E.D. Wis. July 24, 2023).*

This stop was based on reasonable suspicion of human trafficking. United States v. Brown, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126713 (M.D. La. July 24, 2023).*

“Hart does not identify the evidence that his attorney should have moved to suppress. He also does not show how a motion to suppress the unspecified evidence would have been meritorious. Thus, Hart’s motion as to this claim of ineffective assistance of counsel fails as he can show neither deficient performance nor prejudice under Strickland.” United States v. Hart, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126830 (E.D. Ky. June 29, 2023).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress that was frivolous. Williams v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126897 (S.D.W.Va. June 29, 2023).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Late disclosed information justified the late filing of the motion to suppress

E.D.N.Y.: In a murder for hire case, a two year delay between the killing and the search didn’t make it presumably stale

In a murder for hire case, a two year delay between the homicide and the search warrant for defendant’s premises did not make the warrant presumably stale. The warrant sought digital evidence, and there were four conspirators and it spanned nearly six months and involved a business dispute. It was reasonable to conclude records with things (“consumables”) would still be available. The government also showed nexus to their premises. The Instagram warrant also was not overbroad, and the good faith exception applied anyway. United States v. Qing Ming Yu, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126229 (E.D. N.Y. July 21, 2023).

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy against use of photographs of a flyover of his property. United States v. Lee, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126559 (D. Alaska July 24, 2023).

The use of an already present drug dog during the normal incidents of a traffic stop is reasonable. Rush v. State, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS 371 (July 24, 2023).*

Police had reasonable suspicion to put out an alert to stop defendant’s car as likely being involved in a shooting incident. The victim’s report and traffic cameras put it there. United States v. Smith, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 18799 (6th Cir. July 24, 2023).*

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness, Uncategorized | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: In a murder for hire case, a two year delay between the killing and the search didn’t make it presumably stale

DE: SW issuing magistrate not barred from hearing suppression motion

The suppression hearing judge is not disqualified just because he or she considered the affidavit and issued the search warrant. Willis v. State, 2023 Del. LEXIS 238 (July 24, 2023).

Setting inaccuracies in the search warrant affidavit aside, there was still probable cause. United States v. Jones, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 18690 (8th Cir. July 24, 2023).*

The officer could order a motorist out of the car under Mimms. State v. Holler, 2023-Ohio-2528, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2504 (9th Dist. July 24, 2023).*

The police here warned that the police dog was present and was trained to bite. Whether the dog was excessive is usually a jury question. Adams v. City of Cedar Rapids, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 18695 (8th Cir. July 24, 2023).*

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DE: SW issuing magistrate not barred from hearing suppression motion

D.Kan.: The “Kansas Two-Step” order

Shaw v. Jones, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126478 (D. Kan. July 21, 2023):

Continue reading →
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Kan.: The “Kansas Two-Step” order

techdirt: Court Says It’s Fine For Cops To Use Cell Phones To Peep Into People’s Cars

techdirt: Court Says It’s Fine For Cops To Use Cell Phones To Peep Into People’s Cars by Tim Cushing (“What is ‘plain view?’ Cops claim it’s anything anyone could see if they happened to be in the same place at the same time, including those moments when citizens deploy their own air force. Force your way into the house under the ‘community caretaking’ exception to the Fourth Amendment? Anything out in the open is yours to deem criminal evidence. Peek through the windows of cars you’ve pulled over for pretextual reasons? Anything readily visible can provide after-the-fact reasonable suspicion to perform a full-blown search.”) The case is United States v. Poller posted here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on techdirt: Court Says It’s Fine For Cops To Use Cell Phones To Peep Into People’s Cars

CA6: Unintended target of a police shooting, another officer, has a 4A seizure and excessive force claim

One officer fired a gun at a suspect inside a dwelling, apparently without aiming, and hit another officer. That was still a Fourth Amendment seizure of the person of the officer despite being an unintended target. Kilnapp v. City of Cleveland, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 18620 (6th Cir. July 21, 2023).

The court finds the testimony supporting standing of defendant’s friend to be self-serving and not credible. It’s defendant’s burden, and he fails. United States v. Carter, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126305 (M.D. La. July 21, 2023).*

“The 35-day delay between the date of detention and the defendants’ initial appearance is reasonable. The interdiction occurred in the Caribbean Sea, not a great distance from Puerto Rico. … USCG cutters are not, however, ‘used as taxis to ferry detainees immediately to the nearest United States port …. The Government is not required to take the fastest possible route to the courthouse, just a reasonable one.’” United States v. Nibbs, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126295 (D.P.R. July 20, 2023).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Unintended target of a police shooting, another officer, has a 4A seizure and excessive force claim

VT: 14-year-old sex assault victim had sufficient common authority to consent to search of premises for evidence of that crime

Defendant was accused of sexual assault of his 14-year-old daughter, he was arrested, and released on conditions, one of which was a no contact order to say away from the house. The 14-year-old had enough common authority to consent to a search of the house for evidence of the crime against her where a condom wrapper and DNA from semen was recovered. State v. Boyer, 2023 VT 40, 2023 Vt. LEXIS 40 (July 21, 2023).

An LPN check showed that the DL of the owner was suspended. “Because there is nothing in the record to indicate that the driver of the vehicle was someone other than Trout, the registered owner, we conclude that the stop was permissible.” State v. Saul, 2023-Ohio-2510, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2489 (2d Dist. July 21, 2023).*

“Next, Felder’s Fourth Amendment claim—that his cellphone was unlawfully seized and searched—is procedurally defaulted, not cognizable under Section 2255, and in any event, meritless.” It wasn’t ligated before, and it wouldn’t have won. Felder v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126272 (July 21, 2023).*

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on VT: 14-year-old sex assault victim had sufficient common authority to consent to search of premises for evidence of that crime

NYT: Kansas Troopers ‘Waged War on Motorists,’ Federal Judge Finds

NYT: Kansas Troopers ‘Waged War on Motorists,’ Federal Judge Finds by Mitch Smith (“The judge said the Highway Patrol had made a habit of wrongly questioning out-of-state drivers in hopes of turning up drugs.”):

Continue reading →
Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NYT: Kansas Troopers ‘Waged War on Motorists,’ Federal Judge Finds

IN: 3 am entry into backyard to look for weapon when no one around couldn’t be justified by exigency

“There was no emergency here. Officer Eber and the trial court expressed concern that a firearm might have been lying in Hinton’s backyard and could be accessed by a child or other person. But, even if so, there was no one near the premises, and it was around three o’clock in the morning. There was no reason that Officer Eber could not have monitored the scene while seeking a warrant. Thus, Officer Eber’s entry into Hinton’s backyard was not justified by exigent circumstances.” Hinton v. State, 2023 Ind. App. LEXIS 212 (July 21, 2023).

“[T]hese communications between Officer Noe and the detectives amount to at least the ‘minimal level of communication’ necessary to allow the court to apply the collective knowledge doctrine.” United States v. McCrary, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125190 (N.D. Ga. May 31, 2023),* adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123927 (N.D. Ga. July 19, 2023).*

The officer who stopped defendant’s vehicle did so with reasonable suspicion based on collective knowledge. United States v. Kim Dung Thi Lee, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125600 (W.D. Tex. July 20, 2023).*

Posted in Collective knowledge, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IN: 3 am entry into backyard to look for weapon when no one around couldn’t be justified by exigency

N.D.Ga.: Civilly committed have no REP in common computer files

The plaintiff is confined in the Texas Civil Commitment Center. He has no privacy interest in the files he’s saved on TCCC common computers for his cases. Rogers v. McLane, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125554 n. 11 (N.D. Tex. June 30, 2023), adopted 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124036 (N.D. Tex. July 19, 2023).

Dog sniff that occurred immediately and during the normal incidents of a traffic stop was reasonable. State v. Oeun, 2023 N.C. App. LEXIS 419 (July 19, 2023).*

Plaintiff’s complaint that the school district has a custom of violating the Fourth Amendment rights of disabled students fails in the statement of claim. Thomas v. Neenah Joint Sch. Dist., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 18493 (7th Cir. July 20, 2023).*

Defendant’s Franks claim that the officer in a child pornography case misstated the age of the children fails. There were pictures included in the application, and the USMJ could decide for him or herself. United States v. Mileikis, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125013 (D.Mass. July 20, 2023).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Civilly committed have no REP in common computer files

techdirt: Bill Limiting Data Broker Sales To Law Enforcement Moves Forward

techdirt: Bill Limiting Data Broker Sales To Law Enforcement Moves Forward by Tim Cushing (“The Supreme Court made it clear in 2018 with its Carpenter decision: gathering historical cell site location info in bulk was impermissible under the Fourth Amendment. If law enforcement wanted to engage in third-party-enabled long term tracking of suspects via this info, it needed to get a warrant first.”).

I never bother with pending legislation because 90% doesn’t pass. This, however, seems to have bipartisan support and is likely to pass.

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on techdirt: Bill Limiting Data Broker Sales To Law Enforcement Moves Forward

MI: Omission def was a CI was not material where SW was based on possession and sale of drugs

“Agent Merle’s failure to reveal that Brown was a CI for DTF was not a material omission. As discussed previously, the warrant affidavit was based on Brown’s possession and sale of illegal drugs, which did not fall within the scope of his duties as a CI. Brown’s activities as a CI were unrelated to his criminal behavior, which formed the basis for the affidavit.” People v. Brown, 2023 Mich. App. LEXIS 5120 (July 20, 2023).* (So defendant outs himself as a CI?)

The identified CI gave reasonable suspicion for this stop. United States v. Windecker, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124526 (D.Mont. July 18, 2023).*

Defendant’s successive § 2254 petition claim that the judge issuing the warrant here (“Judge 185”) didn’t exist was essentially presented as a successive petition before in 2022, and it’s denied. In re Jackson, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 18409 (11th Cir. July 19, 2023).*

The district court’s electronic search condition for supervised release was not an abuse of discretion and was related to his being a sex offender. United States v. Cruz-Rivera, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 18449 (7th Cir. July 20, 2023).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Omission def was a CI was not material where SW was based on possession and sale of drugs

NY Cortlandt Co.: Requirement of business records searches to take low income housing vouchers violates 4A

Acceptance of section 8 low income housing vouchers violates the Fourth Amendment because the landlord has to permit searches of business records to participate. Rental property is not a closely regulated industry, and 1981’s Sokolov v. Freeport controls. “Thus, by requiring landlords to accept Section 8 vouchers, the source of income antidiscrimination statute necessarily compels landlords to consent to warrantless searches of their properties, in violation of the Fourth Amendment.” People v. Commons West, LLC, 2023 NY Slip Op 23213, 2023 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3552 (Cortland Co. June 27, 2023).

The stop and detention and search were based on an outstanding warrant. Officers were entitled to rely on that warrant, and the courts would not go behind it to declare their good faith reliance invalid. United States v. Basso, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124651 (E.D. Cal. July 19, 2023).

Inventory policy doesn’t have to be in writing to be valid. Here, however, the inventory that occurred only listed a firearm that was seized and nothing else about the backpack. That supports the argument that the inventory was really an evidentiary search. The government has the burden on inventory and the court finds it did not meet its burden. United States v. Lyons, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124682 (N.D. Ga. July 14, 2023).*

Posted in Administrative search, Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on NY Cortlandt Co.: Requirement of business records searches to take low income housing vouchers violates 4A

D.Md.: Surveillance and bodycam video supported officer’s contention def had a firearm in sweatshirt pocket

The court viewed the CCTV and body cam videos (included in the opinion) and it’s apparent defendant had a gun in his sweatshirt pocket. “Not every bulge is a weapon,” but this one apparently was. That justified the frisk. United States v. Jones, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124230 (D. Md. July 18, 2023).

Defendant’s parole search condition led to a valid protective sweep. Viverett v. State, 2023 Ind. App. LEXIS 210 (July 19, 2023).*

A slow speed crash to stop plaintiff was not excessive force. Williams v. Baskett, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 18311 (9th Cir. July 19, 2023).*

Things sought in the warrant could fit in a 3″x3″x1″ lozenge box found in a camera bag so it could be searched. United States v. Sweeney, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124057 (D. Mass. July 19, 2023).*

Posted in Excessive force, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Md.: Surveillance and bodycam video supported officer’s contention def had a firearm in sweatshirt pocket

Cal.4: Parole search that wasn’t “harassing, arbitrary, or capricious” was reasonable

The parole search was valid. “Defendant offers no argument that the search qualified as harassing, arbitrary, or capricious.” People v. Session, 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 549 (4th Dist. July 19, 2023).

Defendants were stopped in a go fast vessel (GFV) on the high seas south of the Dominican Republic. 972kg of cocaine was found and they were brought to the U.S. for prosecution. No due process violation occurred sufficient to dismiss the case. The Fourth Amendment does not apply to a non-citizen on the high seas. United States v. Gonzalez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123790 (S.D. Fla. July 18, 2023).*

Defendant’s encounter was all by consent. Haley v. State, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 5238 (Tex. App. – San Antonio July 19, 2023).*

Stopping a car at gunpoint does not violate clearly established law, even if the motorist isn’t a threat. Cerisier v. City of New York, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 18298 (2d Cir. July 19, 2023).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Foreign searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.4: Parole search that wasn’t “harassing, arbitrary, or capricious” was reasonable