N.D.Cal.: Typo in list of crimes being investigated in affidavit for SW could be overlooked

A typo in the affidavit for warrant including murder as one of the crimes under investigation could be overlooked. United States v. Pokorny, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217899 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2026).

Patdown searches are a part of institutional living for civilly committed SVPs. Welsh v. Management & Training, Corp., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217569 (N.D. Tex. July 29, 2026).*

“[T]he court determined that Brice was entitled to qualified immunity because Hecke failed to identify precedent clearly establishing that a forensic examiner violates the Fourth Amendment by relying on a signed attestation from another officer affirming the legality of a search. The court found further support for this conclusion under the collective knowledge doctrine, which permits law-enforcement officers to rely on facts supplied by other officers to support a search or arrest of a suspect even if the officer himself lacks firsthand knowledge of facts that amount to requisite level of suspicion.” Hecke v. Comm’r of Ind. State Police, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 29421 (7th Cir. Sep. 22, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Collective knowledge, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.