N.D.Ga.: Civilly committed have no REP in common computer files

The plaintiff is confined in the Texas Civil Commitment Center. He has no privacy interest in the files he’s saved on TCCC common computers for his cases. Rogers v. McLane, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125554 n. 11 (N.D. Tex. June 30, 2023), adopted 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124036 (N.D. Tex. July 19, 2023).

Dog sniff that occurred immediately and during the normal incidents of a traffic stop was reasonable. State v. Oeun, 2023 N.C. App. LEXIS 419 (July 19, 2023).*

Plaintiff’s complaint that the school district has a custom of violating the Fourth Amendment rights of disabled students fails in the statement of claim. Thomas v. Neenah Joint Sch. Dist., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 18493 (7th Cir. July 20, 2023).*

Defendant’s Franks claim that the officer in a child pornography case misstated the age of the children fails. There were pictures included in the application, and the USMJ could decide for him or herself. United States v. Mileikis, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125013 (D.Mass. July 20, 2023).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.