Category Archives: Arrest or entry on arrest

W.D.Tenn.: Home of a drug dealer does not create nexus without more evidence of a connection

The home of a drug dealer does not create nexus without more evidence of a connection. United States v. Edwards, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176766 (W.D. Tenn. Sep. 29, 2023). Plaintiff’s arrest for unlawful fishing in Manhattan’s Morningside Park was … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Home of a drug dealer does not create nexus without more evidence of a connection

CA9: Mixed motive for admin search doesn’t make it unreasonable

“The presence of an impermissible motive does not, by itself, establish that the administrative search was pretextual, Orozco, 858 F.3d at 1213, and here, the record shows the presence of a valid motive: the city inspector obtained the administrative search … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: Mixed motive for admin search doesn’t make it unreasonable

OH12: Gerstein violation doesn’t warrant new trial

“Assuming for the sake of argument that Akladyous was in fact improperly detained for more than 48 hours before a probable cause finding was made, such argument would not invalidate his subsequent conviction pursuant to Gerstein.” State v. Akladyous, 2023-Ohio-3105, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH12: Gerstein violation doesn’t warrant new trial

CA11: One acquitted at trial but arrested with PC has no claim

A person acquitted at trial but arrested with probable cause has no claim. Probable cause for arrest survives an acquittal. Davis v. City of Apopka, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22680 (11th Cir. Aug. 28, 2023):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA11: One acquitted at trial but arrested with PC has no claim

CA5: Retaliatory arrest under 1A also requires no PC under 4A

“But this court concluded that ‘Plaintiff-Appellees’ claims against Officer Currie … fall under the Fourth Amendment.’ [Mayfield, 976 F.3d at 486 n.1.] As that opinion explained, ‘in order to bring a First Amendment claim for retaliatory arrest, a plaintiff generally … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Strip search | Comments Off on CA5: Retaliatory arrest under 1A also requires no PC under 4A

CA9: Franks challenge has to include showing lack of PC

On a Franks challenge, “Defendant failed to establish that, if additional information about the informant’s credibility had been included, the affidavit would have been insufficient to establish probable cause.” United States v. Carter, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22478 (9th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: Franks challenge has to include showing lack of PC

TN: Collective knowledge also applies to RS

Collective knowledge also applies to reasonable suspicion. State v. Hodge, 2023 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 317 (Aug. 24, 2023). Defendant’s “certified question” for appeal was overbroad. State v. Beech, 2023 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 313 (Aug. 24, 2023).* Defendant was … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Collective knowledge, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on TN: Collective knowledge also applies to RS

CA5: Arrest on curtilage was subject to questions of fact

Plaintiff raised questions of fact and law as to the officer’s authority to arrest him in his front yard on the curtilage. Summary judgment denied on the merits, but remanded for further qualified immunity analysis. Sauceda v. City of San … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA5: Arrest on curtilage was subject to questions of fact

MO: Failure to allow DUI suspect to contact lawyer before BAC test doesn’t require suppression

The state’s statutory failure to allow defendant to contact a lawyer before a BAC test doesn’t require suppression of the BAC test. Dunbar v. Dir. of Revenue, 2023 Mo. App. LEXIS 582 (Aug. 15, 2023). “Movant provides no facts or … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on MO: Failure to allow DUI suspect to contact lawyer before BAC test doesn’t require suppression

CA5: No police wrongdoing here to support “police created exigency”

Defendant came in to the police for an interview about sex assault in the Army. As it developed, exigency for seizure of defendant’s cell phone arose. This was not a police created exigency which requires some wrongdoing on the part … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: No police wrongdoing here to support “police created exigency”

CA6: Arrest paperwork delay here violated Riverside 48 hour rule

Officers’ apparent delays in processing paperwork on an arrest which resulted in plaintiff spending an extra two days in jail without any kind of probable cause finding violated clearly established law. Here, the prosecutor wouldn’t act without their paperwork. “It … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Arrest paperwork delay here violated Riverside 48 hour rule

CA6: Unintended target of a police shooting, another officer, has a 4A seizure and excessive force claim

One officer fired a gun at a suspect inside a dwelling, apparently without aiming, and hit another officer. That was still a Fourth Amendment seizure of the person of the officer despite being an unintended target. Kilnapp v. City of … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Unintended target of a police shooting, another officer, has a 4A seizure and excessive force claim

Cal.4: Parole search that wasn’t “harassing, arbitrary, or capricious” was reasonable

The parole search was valid. “Defendant offers no argument that the search qualified as harassing, arbitrary, or capricious.” People v. Session, 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 549 (4th Dist. July 19, 2023). Defendants were stopped in a go fast vessel (GFV) … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Foreign searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.4: Parole search that wasn’t “harassing, arbitrary, or capricious” was reasonable

WI: Seizure at door on RS violates 4A

Seizure at the threshold of a home on reasonable suspicion violates the Fourth Amendment which requires probable cause. State v. Cundy, 2023 Wisc. App. LEXIS 761 (July 13, 2023):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on WI: Seizure at door on RS violates 4A

M.D.Ala.: CI’s controlled buy doesn’t have to be on video to support PC

There’s no constitutional requirement that the informant’s controlled buy be on video to support probable cause. United States v. Salter, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119269 (M.D. Ala. June 7, 2023), adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115746 (M.D. Ala. July 6, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: CI’s controlled buy doesn’t have to be on video to support PC

CA3: Saying “this is not my backpack” when shown it during traffic stop is abandonment

“Small abandoned his legitimate expectation of privacy in the backpack. Although Small arguably demonstrated a subjective expectation of privacy by attempting to hide the backpack under his seat (though this act could also be viewed as an effort to physically … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA3: Saying “this is not my backpack” when shown it during traffic stop is abandonment

VA: “[U]nder the Fourth Amendment, probable cause of contraband is the standard to obtain a warrant, not the standard to search a person without one.”

“The Commonwealth bears the burden of proving that a warrantless search fits under an exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment. While the exceptions are many, mere probable cause to arrest is not one of them. Nor can … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on VA: “[U]nder the Fourth Amendment, probable cause of contraband is the standard to obtain a warrant, not the standard to search a person without one.”

N.D.Ind.: “If six law enforcement officers testify credibly to a story that doesn’t make sense, is the Court bound to accept that testimony?” Yes.

“If six law enforcement officers testify credibly to a story that doesn’t make sense, is the Court bound to accept that testimony? That’s the question facing the Court on Defendant’s motion to suppress. Because the Court has no basis to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: “If six law enforcement officers testify credibly to a story that doesn’t make sense, is the Court bound to accept that testimony?” Yes.

MO: Virginia v. Moore does not require officer see the crime to have PC for arrest outside jurisdiction

Virginia v. Moore does not require that an arresting officer personally have seen the act that led to the arrest outside the officer’s jurisdiction as long as there was probable cause. State v. Barton, 2023 Mo. LEXIS 183 (June 27, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on MO: Virginia v. Moore does not require officer see the crime to have PC for arrest outside jurisdiction

NY Bronx: SW for arrest bystander’s cell phone denied

NYPD got a search warrant for a cell phone that a citizen used to record an arrest. The further search warrant to search the phone is denied. They would have to download the entire phone and then search that, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones | Comments Off on NY Bronx: SW for arrest bystander’s cell phone denied