OH12: Gerstein violation doesn’t warrant new trial

“Assuming for the sake of argument that Akladyous was in fact improperly detained for more than 48 hours before a probable cause finding was made, such argument would not invalidate his subsequent conviction pursuant to Gerstein.” State v. Akladyous, 2023-Ohio-3105, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 307 (12th Dist. Sept. 5, 2023).

The warrant completely lacked probable cause a gun would be found in defendant’s house. “Officer Benjamin prepared the affidavit and executed the warrant. As a reasonably well-trained officer, Benjamin would recognize that the affidavit that he presented to the Magistrate was inadequate.” People of the V.I. v. Pryce, 2023 VI SUPER 52U, 2023 V.I. LEXIS 37 (Super. Ct. Aug. 23, 2023) (unpublished).*

A state statute prohibiting stops for defective equipment and having a statutory exclusionary rule was not retroactive to a stop occurring before it was effective. Smith v. Commonwealth, 2023 Va. App. LEXIS 584 (Sep. 5, 2023).*

Weaving in one’s lane and turning headlights on and off was reasonable suspicion. State v. Taylor-Billings, 2023-Ohio-3104 (9th Dist. Sept. 5, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.