E.D.Pa.: Officer’s question about firearms in car made def unreasonably nervous

During a traffic stop, the officer’s question about weapons in the car resulted in defendant’s getting unusually nervous, his breathing completely changing where his chest rose and fell, and he refused to look the officer in the eye. That was enough for a protective sweep of the car, and a gun was found. United States v. Williams, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183411 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 2023).*

A few hours delay in plaintiff’s decedent getting bonded out under state law and Cook County judicial procedure did not violate the Fourth Amendment. It was not reasonably foreseeable that he would commit suicide in custody when he denied any idea of self-harm at book-in. Alcorn v. City of Chi., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 27132 (7th Cir. Oct. 12, 2023).*

“Here, there was reasonable suspicion to search the vehicle. First, there was information that Laureano-Velez was a suspect in a crime committed in Loíza and failed to report to the Carolina Police Station as requested. Being investigated by the PRPD does not necessarily in and of itself make a suspicion reasonable, but there was information that Laureano-Velez was always armed and that he kept a firearm in the vehicles he uses. Dkt. 40-3 at 4. Additionally, he could not be located once he was told to report to the Carolina Police Station. Not only did he fail to report to the Carolina Police Station, Laureano-Velez turned off his phone and could not be found at his house or place of business.” United States v. Laureano-Velez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184787 (D.P.R. Oct. 12, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.