Category Archives: Cell phones

TX3: It was a fair inference for PC that evidence of def’s social media posts were on his phone

Defendant was a suspect in a driveby shooting. Because defendant’s social media showed firearms, it was a fair inference that evidence of the offense or the social media posts would be on his phone. Therefore, there was probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TX3: It was a fair inference for PC that evidence of def’s social media posts were on his phone

CA11: Border searches of electronic devices need no RS

Border searches of electronic devices need no reasonable suspicion, unlike intensive searches of the body. Riley did not change that. United States v. Pulido, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8264 (11th Cir. Apr. 8, 2025). Later acquired information can’t be used … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Border searches of electronic devices need no RS

Detroit Free Press: Lawyer for U-M protester detained at airport after spring break trip with family

Detroit Free Press: Lawyer for U-M protester detained at airport after spring break trip with family by Tresa Baldas:

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on Detroit Free Press: Lawyer for U-M protester detained at airport after spring break trip with family

CNN: Canada warns travelers of US border agents’ authority to search electronic devices

CNN: Canada warns travelers of US border agents’ authority to search electronic devices by Mohammed Tawfeeq:

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on CNN: Canada warns travelers of US border agents’ authority to search electronic devices

S.D.N.Y.: Just because a cell phone was found in def’s car doesn’t mean he has standing to challenge its search

Defendant didn’t show standing to challenge the search of a cell phone found in his car that wasn’t his. United States v. Pulliam, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64356 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2025). A search warrant for a Jan. 6th defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Just because a cell phone was found in def’s car doesn’t mean he has standing to challenge its search

Reason: What To Do If Border Police Ask To Search Your Phone

Reason: What To Do If Border Police Ask To Search Your Phone by Matthew Petti (“Know how much the law does—and doesn’t—protect your privacy rights.”)

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on Reason: What To Do If Border Police Ask To Search Your Phone

CNS: ACLU urges 2nd Circuit to rethink no-warrant cellphone searches at US border

Courthouse News Service: ACLU urges 2nd Circuit to rethink no-warrant cellphone searches at US border by Erik Uebelacker (“A Fourth Amendment carveout that gives U.S. Border Patrol agents the right to conduct warrantless searches shouldn’t apply to cellphones and laptops, … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CNS: ACLU urges 2nd Circuit to rethink no-warrant cellphone searches at US border

D.Ariz.: A cell phone tower dump of a two-hour span is not a “Fourth Amendment event”

A cell phone tower dump of a two-hour span is not a “Fourth Amendment event.” Even if it was, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Pricop, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55939 (D. Ariz. Mar. 25, 2025):

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: A cell phone tower dump of a two-hour span is not a “Fourth Amendment event”

M.D.Ga.: Cell phone in car of drug dealer was seizable and searched with particular SW

Cell phone found in the car of one reasonably believed to be a drug dealer was searched by a warrant that was particular and with probable cause. United States v. Chambers, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53490 (M.D. Ga. Mar. 24, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: Cell phone in car of drug dealer was seizable and searched with particular SW

PA: Contents of a closed shoebox wasn’t in plain view

The contents of a closed shoebox were not in plain view. Commonwealth v. Herlth, 2025 PA Super 73, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS 138 (Mar. 24, 2025). “In sum, the evidence before the Court shows that the PGPD and the FBI … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Overbreadth, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on PA: Contents of a closed shoebox wasn’t in plain view

CA9: 71-day delay for iPhone SW was reasonable where software update was involved

71-day delay in getting search warrant to access defendant’s cell phone was reasonable where the delay was attributed to waiting for a software update for their device because the iPhone was a newer model. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: 71-day delay for iPhone SW was reasonable where software update was involved

S.D.N.Y.: Regularly posting whereabouts on social media helps show nexus to cell phone

Officers keyed on defendant as a shooting suspect because of a social media post from a year before with him wearing what appear to be the pants worn by the shooter. As for nexus to defendant’s phone, they rely on … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Regularly posting whereabouts on social media helps show nexus to cell phone

TN: Nexus shown to cell phone in murder case

The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress the search of his cell phone in a murder case. On the state’s interlocutory appeal, suppression is reversed. There was sufficient nexus shown between the cell phone and the offense under investigation … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on TN: Nexus shown to cell phone in murder case

S.D.Miss.: Because CA5 prohibits broad geofence warrants, cell tower dump warrant unreasonable

USMJ concludes the Fifth Circuit’s geofence warrant case means a cell tower dump warrant is unreasonable. In re Four Applications for Search Warrants Seeking Info. Associated with Particular Cellular Towers, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32995 (S.D. Miss. Feb. 21, 2025):

Posted in Cell phones, geofence | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Because CA5 prohibits broad geofence warrants, cell tower dump warrant unreasonable

TX14: Def’s furtive movements with cell phone can justify exigency to seize it

Defendant’s furtive movements supported exigency that he could attempt to erase things on his cell phone thus justifying its warrantless seizure. Igboji v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 1021 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Feb. 20, 2025) (unpublished), on … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Custody, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on TX14: Def’s furtive movements with cell phone can justify exigency to seize it

OR: Cell phone warrant was sufficiently particular to prevent a general rummaging

For this cell phone search, “As explained above, however, the first and fourth search categories are sufficiently specific, and defendant conceded below that the third category is sufficiently specific. Further, the sixth category’s command to search for location information—as circumscribed … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Particularity | Comments Off on OR: Cell phone warrant was sufficiently particular to prevent a general rummaging

IN: Cell phone ping to locate missing 13-year-old was with exigent circumstances

The ping of defendant’s cell phone to find him when a 13-year-old girl went missing was based on exigency under state statute. Brooks v. State, 2025 Ind. App. LEXIS 19 (Jan. 31, 2025). All the factors supported reasonable suspicion: CI … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Geolocation data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on IN: Cell phone ping to locate missing 13-year-old was with exigent circumstances

NY4: Def proved IAC for failure to move to suppress cell phone search

Defendant satisfied his burden showing that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in defense counsel’s failure to move to suppress his cell phone search. People v. Conley, 2025 NY Slip Op 00597 (4th Dept. Jan. 31, 2025).* The order suppressing … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY4: Def proved IAC for failure to move to suppress cell phone search

KS: Def voluntarily disclosed his cell phone passcode to the officers when the officer said he’d get a warrant

Defendant voluntarily disclosed his cell phone passcode to the officers when the officer said he’d get a warrant for it. State v. Harris, 2025 Kan. LEXIS 5 (Jan. 31, 2025):

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Voluntariness | Comments Off on KS: Def voluntarily disclosed his cell phone passcode to the officers when the officer said he’d get a warrant

E.D.Mo.: Putting def’s cell phone into airplane mode wasn’t a search

Putting defendant’s cell phone into airplane mode wasn’t a search. The name “Red” was seen on the screen. There was independent probable cause for the cell phone warrant. United States v. Hudson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14952 (E.D. Mo. Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Independent source, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Putting def’s cell phone into airplane mode wasn’t a search