CA6: Water heard running in hotel room bathroom supported exigency for avoiding destruction of evidence

Water heard running in the bathroom of a hotel room justified entry to avoid potential destruction of evidence. United States v. Hill, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 785 (6th Cir. Jan. 11, 2023).

Defendant’s Franks challenge doesn’t undermine the two critical facts that show probable cause for the warrant. United States v. Childers, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4260 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 11, 2023).*

A 22-day delay in getting a search warrant for a seized cell phone was not unreasonable. United States v. Hay, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4319 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2023).*

Traveling from one’s home to a hand-to-hand drug buy established nexus to the house. United States v. Randle, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4558 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 10, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Nexus. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.