Author Archives: Hall

MA: Missing juvenile in BOLO was subject to community caretaking function

On a traffic stop, the juvenile was recognized from a BOLO as missing. That then involved the community caretaking function. Commonwealth v. Demos D., 2026 Mass. LEXIS 6 (Jan. 13, 2026). There was reasonable suspicion for stopping plaintiff where he … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Missing juvenile in BOLO was subject to community caretaking function

E.D.Mo.: Search for shell casings in curtilage exceeded community caretaking function entry

A shotspotter alert brought the police to this house, and the police went around looking for signs of anyone that might be injured. Within 20 seconds it was apparent there wasn’t, but then they looked for spent shell casings in … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Community caretaking function, Curtilage | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Search for shell casings in curtilage exceeded community caretaking function entry

4A reasonableness

If a law enforcement officer is never trained on the Fourth Amendment, does he or she get the benefit of the good faith exception or reasonableness? Don’t both require some “understanding” by definition? See Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on 4A reasonableness

SCOTUS: Case v. Montana: community caretaking function doesn’t rely on PC

Brigham City’s “objectively reasonable basis for believing” someone inside needs emergency assistance doesn’t mean probable cause. That’s best left to criminal investigations. Case v. Montana, 2026 U.S. LEXIS 432 (Jan. 14, 2026). Syllabus by the Court:

Posted in Community caretaking function, Reasonableness | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Case v. Montana: community caretaking function doesn’t rely on PC

VA: Refusal to comply with DNA warrant for 12 days was relevant evidence under 403

Defendant’s simple [nonaggressive] refusal to comply with a search warrant for his DNA for 12 days was admissible at trial. [There’s also a prior discussion that suggests harmless error.] Lee v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 32 (Jan. 13, 2026). … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Privileges, Waiver | Comments Off on VA: Refusal to comply with DNA warrant for 12 days was relevant evidence under 403

CA8: Ricocheting bullet not a seizure

Unintended shooting target: “When an officer fires at a dog, is there a seizure of the dog’s owner when the stray bullet hits her instead? We conclude the answer is no.” Hight v. Williams,  2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 781 (8th … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Ricocheting bullet not a seizure

E.D.N.C.: No REP in tent in homeless encampment that was trespassing on private property

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his tent in a homeless encampment on someone else’s private property. That’s “wrongful presence.” He also disclaimed the tent, but standing is enough to deny relief. United States v. Tillman, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Trespass | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: No REP in tent in homeless encampment that was trespassing on private property

W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

The search warrant for a gun involved in shooting was not stale 11 days after the shooting. Firearms are durable and not consumables. United States v. Williams, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4950 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2026). The warrant for … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Staleness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

D.Mass.: Cell site tower dump governed by Carpenter, but GFE applies here because there’s almost no case anywhere else

A cell site tower dump to see who was there at the time of the crime is governed by Carpenter, but the law is completely unclear and the good faith exception saves it. United States v. McDonald, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Cell site tower dump governed by Carpenter, but GFE applies here because there’s almost no case anywhere else

D.Idaho: Ping information not stale

The ping information warrant here was not stale. United States v. Torres, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4593 (D. Idaho Jan. 9, 2026). [It also seems like it would never get stale. It is information not subject to change; if anything, … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Cell site location information, Pretext, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Ping information not stale

AP: What to know about the warrants most immigration agents use to make arrests

AP: What to know about the warrants most immigration agents use to make arrests by Safiyah Riddle and Valerie Gonzalez:

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on AP: What to know about the warrants most immigration agents use to make arrests

E.D.Okla.: Def’s high speed chase was PC

Defendant’s high speed chase was probable cause. “Defendant’s egregious eluding combined with his throwing an object from his vehicle combine to establish probable cause to search the Defendant’s vehicle under the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement.” United … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Def’s high speed chase was PC

CA6: Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim

Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim for relief. Malicious interference would, but that’s not alleged. Tucker v. Horn, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 531 (6th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026). Not search case, but defendant was suspected … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim

D.D.C.: A private tow didn’t violate US Capitol Police inventory policy or 4A

The US Capitol Police inventory policy was followed here, and the motion to suppress is denied. The fact a private company towed the vehicle is of no moment to the policy or the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Johnson, 2026 … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Inventory | Comments Off on D.D.C.: A private tow didn’t violate US Capitol Police inventory policy or 4A

E.D.Ky.: DTF stop on interstate wasn’t pretextual when it was objectively reasonable for overtinting

It doesn’t matter that DTF officers were on the interstate and ordered defendant’s stop for a window tint violation because there was objective justification for it. The rest of the stop was with reasonable suspicion for the drug dog. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: DTF stop on interstate wasn’t pretextual when it was objectively reasonable for overtinting

D.S.D.: No standing in employer’s laptop

2255 petitioner fails on standing to contest of search of this laptop. Based on all the court can see, including the PSR description, the laptop belonged to his employer, not him. All the electronic devices of the employer were seized. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.D.: No standing in employer’s laptop

E.D.Mich.: No standing in mobile home defendant burned down

In direct appeal of his conviction, defendant was found not to have standing in the mobile home he burned because he no longer had any reasonable expectation of privacy in it. He’s Stoned out on habeas too. Sindone v. Miniard, … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No standing in mobile home defendant burned down

N.D.Iowa: Affidavit for SW could have been more explicit, but it still was good enough for PC

The affidavit for warrant isn’t perfect but it’s good enough for the issuing magistrate to draw inferences. “Again, the affidavit could have been improved with explicit explanations of the ‘how’ and ‘why.’ But I do not fault an experienced judge … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Affidavit for SW could have been more explicit, but it still was good enough for PC

D.D.C.: A dozen officers involved in traffic stop slow walked it for drug dog

A dozen officers purposely delayed the traffic stop for a dog sniff. “The Government has failed to show that police conducted this stop in a reasonably diligent manner. To the contrary, Officer Brennan’s decision to delegate all four warnings to … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.D.C.: A dozen officers involved in traffic stop slow walked it for drug dog

DE: Judge issuing track and trace order didn’t have to recuse from trial

The fact “the judge who presided over trial had signed a pen register or ‘track and trace’ warrant before [defendant’s] arrest” didn’t require recusal. The state court had already held issuing a search warrant didn’t require recusal either. Fayton v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Judge issuing track and trace order didn’t have to recuse from trial