Author Archives: Hall

D.Md.: AG’s admin. investigative demand for improper purpose and quashed; constitutional right of privacy in medical records

The AG issued a subpoena to a hospital for records of adolescent gender affirming care. The subpoena is quashed. The subject has Art. III standing. There is no allegation of a health care offense to support the subpoena. In addition, … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Md.: AG’s admin. investigative demand for improper purpose and quashed; constitutional right of privacy in medical records

MS.now: Federal immigration agents keep shooting at drivers. We tracked 15 cases since July.

MS.now: Federal immigration agents keep shooting at drivers. We tracked 15 cases since July. By David Noriega & Kay Guerrero (“After each shooting, federal agencies claimed the drivers tried to ram agents with their vehicles. But the claim often falls … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on MS.now: Federal immigration agents keep shooting at drivers. We tracked 15 cases since July.

GA: Cell phone dropped in flight from police was abandoned

Defendant abandoned the cell phone he dropped in flight from the police which he failed to return for. Franklin v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 20 (Jan. 21, 2026).* Defendant filed his first post-conviction claim not mentioning ineffective assistance for not … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Cell phone dropped in flight from police was abandoned

CA7: Stop at night in a high crime area and furtive movements justified protective sweep of car

Defendant was stopped in a high crime area at night, and his furtive movements in the car justified a protective sweep of the car. United States v. Erving, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 1377 (7th Cir. Jan. 20, 2026).* Defendant’s car … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Stop at night in a high crime area and furtive movements justified protective sweep of car

C.D.Cal.: DHS’s motion for summary judgment denied; L.A. Press Club states cause of action for excessive force against press

The L.A. Press Club’s suit against DHS for excessive force against the press corps can proceed and summary judgment for the defense is denied. “The Court rejects Defendants’ standing and First Amendment arguments for reasons similar to those already articulated … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: DHS’s motion for summary judgment denied; L.A. Press Club states cause of action for excessive force against press

AP: Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge’s warrant, memo says

AP: Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge’s warrant, memo says by Rebecca Santana: Federal immigration officers are asserting sweeping power to forcibly enter people’s homes without a judge’s warrant, according to an internal Immigration and … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on AP: Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge’s warrant, memo says

D.Colo.: Large volume of emails can be seized for later narrowing search and still be particular

The email warrant was particular enough. While a large volume of information was provided by Google, it was then particularly searched, and that satisfies Rule 41 and the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Garcia, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9434 (D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Cell phones, E-mail, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Large volume of emails can be seized for later narrowing search and still be particular

UT: State used SW to get defense expert’s computer data; ordered destroyed, but case not dismissed

The state used a search warrant to access the defense expert’s work product in a sex case. The court held hearings and found that the attorney-client work product was not accessed by the state but ordered the data product of … Continue reading →

Posted in FISA, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on UT: State used SW to get defense expert’s computer data; ordered destroyed, but case not dismissed

E.D.Mo.: Refusal to promptly ID oneself justified handcuffing during brief investigative detention

Responding to a call, defendant fairly matched the description. When he would not identify himself, it was reasonable to handcuff him for a few minutes while it was sorted out. United States v. Troupe, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9010 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Refusal to promptly ID oneself justified handcuffing during brief investigative detention

OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

The dog handler’s testimony that the dog was certified before this sniff was sufficient to show the dog was reliable. State v. Murphy, 2026-Ohio-143 (2d Dist. Jan. 13, 2026). Search warrants can be based on hearsay. Mendenhall v. City & … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

NY Queens: SW issuing court can narrow time to execute to avoid children at home

The court was asked to issue a search warrant for execution 6 am to 9 pm. The court required 9-2 so children won’t be around. The officer agreed, the ADA did not. This explains why that’s a reasonable restriction. Matter … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY Queens: SW issuing court can narrow time to execute to avoid children at home

WI: SnapChat’s view of 16 sec. CSAM video coming through it was private search

SnapChat viewing a 16-second video that came through its system was a private search. It was not unreasonable for officers to view it too without a warrant when SnapChat sent it to the police. Then that led to a warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WI: SnapChat’s view of 16 sec. CSAM video coming through it was private search

ME: No REP in the shower area of a day homeless resource center

Defendant used a homeless resource center by day for taking showers. He was not an overnight guest and had no standing in the shower dressing area. State v. Zackaria, 2026 ME 2, 2026 Me. LEXIS 2 (Jan. 13, 2026). Officers … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search, Standing | Comments Off on ME: No REP in the shower area of a day homeless resource center

WA: SW at 6 am, ziptied, questioned, but told he wasn’t under arrest is still custody

Defendant was in custody for Miranda when a warrant was executed at his house at 6 am and he was taken outside, separated from his family, and ziptied but told he was not under arrest. State v. Magana-Arevalo, 2026 Wash. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Custody, Franks doctrine, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: SW at 6 am, ziptied, questioned, but told he wasn’t under arrest is still custody

NM: Name on an older warrant list wasn’t individualized suspicion when stop occurred

The officer believed defendant’s name was on an old warrant list they get from the magistrates once every week or two. The age of the list denied individualized suspicion. It wasn’t checked before the stop (even though it turned out … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Name on an older warrant list wasn’t individualized suspicion when stop occurred

SCOTUS grants cert in geofence case, Chatrie v. United States

Chatrie v. United States, 25-112 (cert. granted Jan. 16, 2026). Question presented:

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on SCOTUS grants cert in geofence case, Chatrie v. United States

The Intercept: FBI Raid on WaPo Reporter’s Home Was Based on Sham Pretext

The Intercept: FBI Raid on WaPo Reporter’s Home Was Based on Sham Pretext (“On Wednesday morning, the FBI raided the home of Washington Post journalist Hannah Natanson in an alarming escalation of the Trump administration’s war on press freedom. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on The Intercept: FBI Raid on WaPo Reporter’s Home Was Based on Sham Pretext

N.D.Ga.: Slight delay in searching a cell phone of a person in custody who couldn’t possess it was reasonable

Because he’s in custody, defendant has a diminished expectation of getting his cell phone back. The slight delay in getting a warrant has no case law cited in support, not that it matters. United States v. Holloman, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Slight delay in searching a cell phone of a person in custody who couldn’t possess it was reasonable

D.Kan.: Search incident of a car after DUI arrest was reasonable under Gant

Search incident of a car after DUI arrest was reasonable under Gant. United States v. Peralta, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7341 (D. Kan. Jan. 13, 2026). [It could also be argued that the automobile exception would work here, too, when … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Search incident, Strip search | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Search incident of a car after DUI arrest was reasonable under Gant

Cal.2d: NDO in SW to Microsoft doesn’t violate state statute or 1A

A nondisclosure order in a search warrant to an electronic service provider does not violate state law or the First Amendment. Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 17 (2d Dist. Jan. 14, 2026):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Nondisclosure order, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Cal.2d: NDO in SW to Microsoft doesn’t violate state statute or 1A