Author Archives: Hall

D.Minn.: Even if stop was without RS, eluding police gave it

Even if there was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop, his new offense of eluding the police justified it. United States v. Denton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170669 (D. Minn. Sep. 23, 2024).* The affidavit for this warrant shows probable … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Even if stop was without RS, eluding police gave it

D.Or.: The reporting requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act of 2021 do not violate the 4A or 5A

The reporting requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act of 2021 31 U.S.C. § 5336 do not violate the Fourth or Fifth Amendment under California Bankers Assn. v. Shutlz. Firestone v. Yellen, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170085 (D. Or. Sep. 20, … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Or.: The reporting requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act of 2021 do not violate the 4A or 5A

NYT: N.Y.P.D. Unwilling to Discipline Officers for Stop and Frisk, Report Says

NYT: N.Y.P.D. Unwilling to Discipline Officers for Stop and Frisk, Report Says by Benjamin Weiser & Maria Cramer (“The department’s discipline for illegal street detentions is lax at every level, according to an extraordinary review ordered by a federal judge.”) … Continue reading →

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NYT: N.Y.P.D. Unwilling to Discipline Officers for Stop and Frisk, Report Says

IL: No REP in ER trauma room

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a hospital ER trauma room, even though there is under state precedent in a single bedroom. People v. Turner, 2024 IL 129208, 2024 Ill. LEXIS 469 (Sept. 19, 2024). Defendant argued that … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IL: No REP in ER trauma room

IL: With MJ decrim, smell of MJ no longer PC

With decriminalization of small amounts of marijuana, the smell of marijuana in a car is no longer probable cause to search. People v. Redmond, 2024 IL 129201, 2024 Ill. LEXIS 464 (Sep. 19, 2024). See techdirt: Court Reminds Cops That … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on IL: With MJ decrim, smell of MJ no longer PC

WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS

Defendant left his car at a convenience store’s gas pumps for 30-40 minutes. The police dog sniff while it was parked was not unreasonable. It was not a stop to be extended. Labbe v. State, 2024 WY 99, 2024 Wyo. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS

D.Neb.: SW for property not overbroad and sought in GF; it objectively was a single-family home

The officers did their due diligence before the search warrant and saw only that defendant’s property was a single-family dwelling. That’s how it appeared, that’s what public records said. Therefore, they searched in good faith. United States v. Rice, 2024 … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Neb.: SW for property not overbroad and sought in GF; it objectively was a single-family home

W.D.Pa.: Electronic devices seized in California could be searched in Pennsylvania

Electronic devices seized in California could be searched in Pennsylvania. United States v. Carter, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168014 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 18, 2024). Under established precedent, the smell of marijuana alone coming from defendant’s car permits a search of … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Electronic devices seized in California could be searched in Pennsylvania

OR: The burden on whether the affidavit was with the warrant at the search is on defendant

When the affidavit satisfies particularity but the defendant alleges the warrant doesn’t, he has the burden of proving that both were not attached to each other or at the scene of the search for guidance. State v. Goode, 335 Or. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: The burden on whether the affidavit was with the warrant at the search is on defendant

CA9: Inventory of backpack of just released suspect was still reasonable

Defendant was arrested on suspicion of murder, and his backpack was put in the police car. His backpack was briefly searched and nothing was found. He was released after questioning, but his backpack was subjected to a later inventory which … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Inventory of backpack of just released suspect was still reasonable

GA: Swabbing handcuffed arrestee’s hands for DNA valid as SI

Swabbing defendant’s hands for DNA while he was handcuffed in an interrogation room was valid as search incident. The DNA was easily destroyed. (Thus exigency too.) Gonzalez v. State, 2024 Ga. LEXIS 203 (Sep. 17, 2024). An warrant still in … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on GA: Swabbing handcuffed arrestee’s hands for DNA valid as SI

CA11: Being on a no-fly list wasn’t RS on highway

Plaintiff’s being on a no-fly list wasn’t reasonable suspicion to detain him on the highway. Meshal v. Commissioner, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23486 (11th Cir. Sep. 16, 2024). “[T]he officer did not violate the Fourth Amendment because his warrantless entry … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Being on a no-fly list wasn’t RS on highway

W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a reasonable seizure and with RS

“The Court finds that when Officers Zinn and Jasso placed the stop sticks and attempted to remove the subject from his vehicle, they had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the individual behind the wheel of the Dodge Charger was involved … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a reasonable seizure and with RS

N.D.Ind.: Cell phones are “tools of the trade” of drug dealing, so nexus is minimal [actually, practically non-existent]

While cell phones are “tools of the trade” of drug dealing, they usually can be swept up in a search warrant for the premises. While that works in drug cases, there should be caution in other types of cases. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Cell phones are “tools of the trade” of drug dealing, so nexus is minimal [actually, practically non-existent]

D.Minn.: “Cars on the property” was particular enough for SW

“Cars on the property” was particular enough for the search warrant for defendant’s property. United States v. Stucky, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166040 (D. Minn. Sep. 16, 2024). Plaintiff inmate stated enough to proceed that he was subjected to harassing … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: “Cars on the property” was particular enough for SW

CA9: Kneeling on arrestee’s back so he can’t breathe violates clearly established law

The officers’ kneeling on plaintiff’s back to secure him to the point plaintiff complained he couldn’t breathe violated clearly established law. Spencer v. Pew, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23463 (9th Cir. Sep. 16, 2024). The dash cam shows that defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Kneeling on arrestee’s back so he can’t breathe violates clearly established law

Brownstone Institute: A Fourth Amendment for the 21st century

Brownstone Institute: A Fourth Amendment for the 21st century by Daniel Nuncio (“‘Twentieth-century Fourth Amendment law was really written for a world before computers,’ stated Reilly Stephens, an attorney with the Liberty Justice Center, in an early September interview. ‘It … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Brownstone Institute: A Fourth Amendment for the 21st century

Natl. L. Rev.: The Reasonableness of Retaining Personal Property Post-Seizure and the Ascendancy of Text, History, and Tradition in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

Natl. L. Rev.: The Reasonableness of Retaining Personal Property Post-Seizure and the Ascendancy of Text, History, and Tradition in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence by Ty E. Howard [the case is posted here]:

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure | Comments Off on Natl. L. Rev.: The Reasonableness of Retaining Personal Property Post-Seizure and the Ascendancy of Text, History, and Tradition in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

Five on habeas

NYPD used a tracking order based on exigency followed by a written order to locate him. This was not shown to be an unconscionable breakdown in the process for Stone purposes. Also, his phone calls from Rikers were validly recorded. … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on Five on habeas

FL6: Handicapped parking violation justified stop

Illegally parking [actually standing] in a handicapped spot was an objective basis for defendant’s stop. State v. Diaz, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 7143 (Fla. 6th DCA Sep. 13, 2024).* Defendant’s mother’s consent was validly obtained just as a protective sweep … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL6: Handicapped parking violation justified stop