Atlanta Black Star: ‘Eight Rounds After I Was on the Ground’: Texas Cops at the Wrong Home Opened Fire on Man Even After He Surrendered

Atlanta Black Star: ‘Eight Rounds After I Was on the Ground’: Texas Cops at the Wrong Home Opened Fire on Man Even After He Surrendered by Carlos Miller (“Another police blunder led to the shooting of a man in Texas who believed his house was being burglarized after hearing loud pounding on his front door at 1:45 a.m. last week. Thomas Simpson said he stepped out of his garage with a gun to confront the alleged intruders, but then dropped the gun when he realized they were cops. But the Grand Prairie police officers claimed they were in fear for their lives and fired several shots after he had dropped the gun. Fortunately, he was only struck once in the leg and is recovering from the gunshot wound.”)

Posted in Excessive force, Nighttime search | Comments Off on Atlanta Black Star: ‘Eight Rounds After I Was on the Ground’: Texas Cops at the Wrong Home Opened Fire on Man Even After He Surrendered

HI: Failure to include affidavit for SW in record precludes appellate review

Failure to include the affidavit for search warrant in the record precludes appellate review. As best the court can on the merits, defendant would lose anyway. State v. Bibbs, 2025 Haw. App. LEXIS 451 (Sep. 22, 2025).

The search of a bag on defendant’s person when he visited his parole officer was reasonable. The PO had a prior tip about the bag, and defendant never showed up with one before. State v. Jenkins, 2025-Ohio-4447 (1st Dist. Sep. 24, 2025). [Who goes to the parole office carrying a gun knowing they’re always subject to search?]

There were two search warrants. They both stand on their own. Even if the first was invalid, which it’s not, it doesn’t affect the second. And there’s probable cause for both. United States v. Banks, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187695 (D. Or. Sep. 24, 2025).*

2254 petitioner had his full and fair opportunity to litigate his search claim in state court, so no habeas relief. Jackson v. Sec’y, Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24747 (11th Cir. Sep. 23, 2025).*

Posted in Burden of proof, Independent source, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Waiver | Comments Off on HI: Failure to include affidavit for SW in record precludes appellate review

D.Kan.: Affidavit emailed with SW to judge was considered “attached”

In overcoming a warrant particularity challenge cured by the affidavit, the government satisfied its burden that the affidavits in support of the warrant were emailed to the issuing judge as two pdf files in the same email. They weren’t, of course, stapled together, but they were considered together. United States v. Langhover, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185815 (D. Kan. Sep. 22, 2025).

Defendant’s girlfriend’s statement she was Facetiming him at the time of a shooting was nexus for search of the phone. Mallery v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7487 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Sep. 25, 2025).*

911 anonymous call with details confirmed at the scene was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Hoskins, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187915 (E.D. Va. Sep. 23, 2025).

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Affidavit emailed with SW to judge was considered “attached”

N.D.Ohio: Def’s own statement can be PC without having to prove it

No case says that officers can’t rely on defendant’s own statement when relying on it as probable cause. They don’t have to prove it up. United States v. Alexander, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185275 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 22, 2025).

“Sales’ argument [on lack of probable cause] rests on the proposition that the informants cited in the warrant application were not shown to be credible or corroborated by other sources. The informants’ credibility or reliability was not alleged in the warrant application. However, there is no need to demonstrate reliability of an informant based on prior dealings if the information provided is specific, learned through personal observation, and has been corroborated through other sources. … In this case, the warrant affidavit shows the informants’ information was based on personal observation (either explicit or implicit), fresh, detailed, and, to the extent possible, corroborated by police investigation and surveillance. …” State v. Sales, 2025 Mo. App. LEXIS 625 (Sep. 22, 2025).*

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in sounds coming from his apartment that somebody could record with a cell phone and then complain about him. Ogidi-Ghigbaje v. Riseboro Hous., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186979 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2025).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Def’s own statement can be PC without having to prove it

The Intercept: Courts Block Meta From Sharing Anti-ICE Activists’ Instagram Account Info With Feds

The Intercept: Courts Block Meta From Sharing Anti-ICE Activists’ Instagram Account Info With Feds by Shawn Musgrave (“A federal judge in San Francisco on Wednesday temporarily blocked a federal administrative subpoena aimed at unmasking Instagram accounts that named and shamed a Border Patrol agent who was part of the immigration raids in Los Angeles this summer. The Department of Homeland Security sent an administrative subpoena to Meta in early September demanding the names, email addresses, and phone numbers associated with six separate Instagram accounts. Three Instagram users and immigration activists filed separate motions to quash the subpoena last week.”)

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on The Intercept: Courts Block Meta From Sharing Anti-ICE Activists’ Instagram Account Info With Feds

E.D.Va.: Officer’s mere belief def might be the shooter in an incident based on history alone isn’t RS

An officer’s alleged belief that defendant was capable of being the shooter in an incident based on his history isn’t reasonable suspicion. United States v. Neville, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186545 (E.D. Va. Sep. 22, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Officer’s mere belief def might be the shooter in an incident based on history alone isn’t RS

S.D.N.Y.: No § 1983 claim for officer’s wrongfully obtaining ALPR information for personal reasons

Plaintiff’s § 1983 claim that a police officer used ALPR technology to track her for personal reasons didn’t state a Fourth Amendment claim because of the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy in LPN information. “Here, even if Carpenter provides the correct framework to analyze the purported search, the SAC does not allege sufficient facts for the Court to infer that the LPR database reveals the same ‘depth, breadth, and comprehensive reach’ of information such as CSLI. Carpenter, 585 U.S. at 320. Zambrano alleges only that the LPR helps ‘pinpoint [a] vehicle’s specific whereabouts at a specific time,’ and that Sylvester accessed her LPR location information approximately 111 times.” Rinaldi v. Sylvester, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187115 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2025).

“The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized, or implied, that the defendant’s flight from police officers is the most important factor in the totality of the circumstances analysis.” State v. Williams, 2025 La. App. LEXIS 1781 (La. App. 5 Cir. Sep. 24, 2025).*

“As a primarily matter, we note that driving a third under the speed limit, which Paez was doing, together with other circumstances, has been held to support a finding of reasonable suspicion that the driver was driving while intoxicated.” Paez v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7445 (Tex. App. – San Antonio Sep. 24, 2025).*

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No § 1983 claim for officer’s wrongfully obtaining ALPR information for personal reasons

E.D.Pa.: Two minute “roadblock” for GPS tracked stolen cell phone was reasonable

A two minute “roadblock” to stop robbery suspects with a stolen cell phone transmitting its GPS location was with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Jones, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185143 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2025).

The limitation on search warrants only being executed in the jurisdiction where they are issued doesn’t apply to arrest warrants. State v. Russell, 343 Or. App. 573 (Sep. 24, 2025).

When defendant’s girlfriend opened the door of their place, the police smelled marijuana. That provided probable cause for a warrant. The protective sweep before wasn’t unreasonable. State v. Jarquin, 2025 La. LEXIS 1215 (Sep. 24, 2025).*

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Roadblocks | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Two minute “roadblock” for GPS tracked stolen cell phone was reasonable

D.D.C.: Arrest on outdated warrant doesn’t depend on its underlying validity

Plaintiff’s arrest on an outdated warrant doesn’t depend on the underlying validity of the warrant. Here, the warrant wasn’t purged from the system before plaintiff’s stop and arrest. Otero v. District of Columbia, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185918 (D.D.C. Sep. 22, 2025).

Inmate’s strip search claim fails: “Plaintiff’s allegations do not support a constitutional claim under either context. The Complaint provides no information about the scope of the search, the manner in which the search was conducted, or the justification offered for the search. Plaintiff describes no contact and no harm; he does not describe any actual or perceived danger to his safety.” Payne v. Gerling, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186127 (S.D. Ill. Sep. 22, 2025).*

“‘[A] “full and fair opportunity’ guarantees only ‘the right to present one’s case.’” Watson v. Hulick, 481 F.3d 537, 542 (7th Cir. 2007) (quoting Cabrera, 324 F.3d at 531-32). ‘[I]t does not guarantee a correct result.’ Cabrera, 324 F.3d at 532. Nothing in the state-court record suggests that Strieter was denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate her consent claim in state court. The trial court’s hearing on the issue was not a sham. The hearing testimony and the body-cam footage support the trial court’s factual determinations. And the trial court did not commit an egregious error in resolving the consent issue or fail to take the issue seriously. Thus, Stone precludes me from reaching the merits of Strieter’s Fourth Amendment claim.” Strieter v. Cahak, Warden, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185616 (E.D. Wis. Sep. 22, 2025).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Arrest on outdated warrant doesn’t depend on its underlying validity

C.D.Cal.: No REP in bankruptcy trustee records

A person forced into bankruptcy has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his firm records. United States v. Girardi, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186007 (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2025).

Defendant well argued his suppression motion in state court and he doesn’t get to do it again in habeas. Zuniga v. McConahay, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184197 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 19, 2025).*

The search of defendant’s car was reasonable by consent and community caretaking function but not the automobile exception. State v. Falcon, 319 Neb. 911 (Sep. 19, 2025).*

Failure to stop behind the stop line at an intersection justifies a traffic stop. State v. Stevenson, 2025-Ohio-4431 (5th Dist. Sep. 18, 2025).*

Posted in Community caretaking function, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: No REP in bankruptcy trustee records

SCOTUSBlog: The dog sniff at the center of a Supreme Court petition

SCOTUSBlog: The dog sniff at the center of a Supreme Court petition by Kelsey Dallas:

Continue reading
Posted in Dog sniff, Trespass | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: The dog sniff at the center of a Supreme Court petition

LA1: Accelerant detection dog’s alert supported PC despite negative lab test

The fact the accelerant detection dog alerted supports probable cause despite later negative lab tests. State v. Hale, 2025 La. App. LEXIS 1749 (La. App. 1 Cir Sep. 19, 2025).

Officers did not violate curtilage by observing shell casings in defendant’s yard during a knock-and-talk. United States v. Havins, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24406 (9th Cir. Sep. 12, 2025).*

“The Court is not persuaded by the Defendant’s argument. The fact that there are minor inconsistencies regarding the location of the pound of marijuana or the level of activity at the house does not establish a Franks hearing is required here. As discussed in the Recommendation, even assuming the Defendant meets the first prong of the Franks analysis, the totality of the circumstances presents a fair probability that illegal activity was occurring at the home. Every vehicle stopped leaving the residence was found to conceal contraband — drugs and a significant quantity of machine-gun-conversion devices.” United States v. Lausane, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184321 (M.D. Ala. Sep. 19, 2025).*

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Knock and talk | Comments Off on LA1: Accelerant detection dog’s alert supported PC despite negative lab test

S.D.Ill.: Search of room adjoining arrest wasn’t valid as SI or protective sweep

Defendant had standing as an occasional overnight guest in his ex-girlfriend’s apartment when he was there when the police arrived to arrest him. The search of another room was neither valid as a search incident or protective sweep. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Ackins, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184920 (S.D. Ill. Sep. 19, 2025).

Defendant’s admission he had a gun on him was probable cause. People v. Turner, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 7637 (Sep. 19, 2025).*

Defendant’s struggle and assault on the officers obviated any claim that he couldn’t be ordered out of the car. People v. Day, 2025 IL App (4th) 241371, 2025 Ill. App. LEXIS 1076 (Sep. 18, 2025).*

On plain error review of defendant’s arrest and custody, the record wasn’t developed for that, just guilt or innocence. Without an adequate record, no plain error. United States v. Otero, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24344 (6th Cir. Sep. 17, 2025).*

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Search incident, Standards of review | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Search of room adjoining arrest wasn’t valid as SI or protective sweep

TNR: Brett Kavanaugh’s Shadow Docket Attack on Your Civil Liberties

TNR: Brett Kavanaugh’s Shadow Docket Attack on Your Civil Liberties by Blame Brett (“Whether motivated by animus or naïveté, the justice’s rationale for permitting law enforcement to racially profile suspects has dark implications for democracy.”)

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on TNR: Brett Kavanaugh’s Shadow Docket Attack on Your Civil Liberties

E.D.Pa.: Def succeeds in suppressing a stop when he even lacked standing to challenge the search

Defendant was a passenger in the car that was stopped. While he wouldn’t have standing in the car, he persuaded the court that the stop lacked justification based on credibility of witnesses, and the motion to suppress is granted. United States v. Wynn, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184598 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2025).

On post-conviction, petitioner’s illegal arrest claim is defaulted because it should have been raised in the original case. But, it wasn’t even illegal. United States v. Orlandella, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184747 (D. Mass. Sep. 19, 2025).*

The officer making an arrest for assault doesn’t have to consider affirmative defenses unless they’re apparent. Here, the officer was on notice, but there was probable cause anyway. United States v. McGrady, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181723 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 14, 2025).*

Defendant’s guilty plea waives his Fourth Amendment claim. Hogenkamp v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184537 (W.D. Wis. Sep. 18, 2025).*

Posted in Probable cause, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Def succeeds in suppressing a stop when he even lacked standing to challenge the search

W.D.N.Y.: Trial cross-exam was properly limited into SW affidavit statements what would have led to minitrials

On defendant’s motion for new trial, the court properly limited cross-examination over statements in a search warrant affidavit that would have led to mini-trials and misled the jury. United States v. Payne, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184595 (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Oath or affirmation | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Trial cross-exam was properly limited into SW affidavit statements what would have led to minitrials

LA1: Information negating PC should have been included, but doesn’t matter here

Omitted information didn’t negate probable cause. “When considering the totality of the other facts included in the affidavit, the negative lab results do not negate the existence of probable cause for the search warrant. Here, the trial court admonished the State for this oversight and agreed that the omitted lab result is ‘not a major part of the warrant, but still [is] a factor.’ Nevertheless, the trial court ruled that ‘there was enough presented’ to support the issuance of the warrant. We agree. This assignment of error is without merit.” State v. Hale, 2025 La. App. LEXIS 1749 (La. App. 1 Cir Sep. 19, 2025).*

“Much of Defendant’s argument simply argues inferences from the evidence in a manner more favorable to his position that he was unable to give voluntary consent based on his injury from the collision or his impairment, but we are bound by the trial court’s findings of fact which are not challenged as unsupported by the evidence.” State v. Armstrong, 2025 N.C. App. LEXIS 607 (Sep. 17, 2025).*

The court doesn’t find the officer’s testimony there was a “strong odor” of marijuana coming from the car to be credible. People v. Turnbull, 2025 VI SUPER 26, 2025 V.I. LEXIS 32 (Super. Ct. July 21, 2025).*

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on LA1: Information negating PC should have been included, but doesn’t matter here

SCOTUSBlog: “Roving patrols,” reasonable suspicion, and Perdomo

SCOTUSBlog: “Roving patrols,” reasonable suspicion, and Perdomo by Rory Little:

Continue reading
Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: “Roving patrols,” reasonable suspicion, and Perdomo

IA: Wallet subject to SI

A wallet in one’s pocket is subject to search incident. State v. Beyer, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 822 (Sep. 17, 2025).*

Reaffirming: “No longer may local antiscavenging ordinances support a finding that garbage placed outside defendants’ property for collection is not yet abandoned. No longer may defendants claim that an officer conducting a trash pull has committed a trespass. And no longer may defendants claim a reasonable expectation of privacy in discarded trash.” State v. Lowman, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 809 (Sep. 17, 2025).*

Police responded to a civil standby for recovery of an allegedly stolen motorcycle. They let the person they believed to be the true owner leave with it. They get qualified immunity. Thompson v. Cockrell, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 23991 (8th Cir. Sep. 17, 2025).*

Posted in Digital privacy, Search incident, Trespass | Comments Off on IA: Wallet subject to SI

IA: RS for this DUI stop was the gait of def walking toward his car

Reasonable suspicion for this DUI stop was the gait of defendant walking toward his car. State v. Nockels, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 812 (Sep. 17, 2025).

Plaintiff was hurt during police response to a domestic dispute. “Hoover filed this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Due violated his Fourth Amendment rights when he unlawfully entered his home and used excessive force against him. The district court denied summary judgment to Due on both claims. Due appeals, arguing that he is entitled to qualified immunity. Because a reasonable juror could conclude that Due’s warrantless entry into Hoover’s home was unlawful, and that his use of force to effectuate that entry was unreasonable, we affirm.” Hoover v. Due, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24046 (6th Cir. Sep. 17, 2025).*

A search warrant for the person is presumptively constitutional. Finding no drugs, the stop then can turn to reasonable suspicion for continuing it, and the officers had that. State v. Spies, 2025 Haw. LEXIS 243 (Sep. 16, 2025).

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: RS for this DUI stop was the gait of def walking toward his car