Reason.com: ICE Arrested a U.S. Citizen—Twice—During Alabama Construction Site Raids. Now He’s Suing.

Reason.com: ICE Arrested a U.S. Citizen—Twice—During Alabama Construction Site Raids. Now He’s Suing. by C.J. Ciaramella (“‘I got arrested twice for being a Latino working in construction,’ says Leo Garcia Venegas, the lead plaintiff in a new lawsuit filed by the Institute for Justice challenging warrantless ICE raids on construction sites.”)

Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Reason.com: ICE Arrested a U.S. Citizen—Twice—During Alabama Construction Site Raids. Now He’s Suing.

S.D.Tex.: When officer knows RS for stop ceases to exist, checking license and papers unreasonable

Having discovered that there was no legal basis for defendant’s stop, asking for papers unreasonably extended the stop. “Broadening Rodriguez to allow officers to inspect documents when they are already aware that no violation has occurred would effectively sanction random license checks of every motorist on the freeway. See Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 52 (1979) (when officers initiate stops lacking an ‘objective criteria, the risk of arbitrary and abusive police practices exceeds tolerable limits’).” United States v. Rivera-Leal, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192814 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 30, 2025). [The government will appeal this.]

Where it was undisputed that a teacher had good reason to believe a student had a gun at school, qualified immunity applies. “Russell had good cause to believe that X.M. might have had a gun at school. Because the other facts in dispute are not material to Russell’s qualified immunity defense, and because Russell—as a matter of law—did not violate X.M.’s clearly established constitutional rights, even under X.M.’s version of the facts, we REVERSE.” Johnson v. Mount Pleasant Pub. Sch., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 25334 (6th Cir. Sep. 30, 2025) (2-1).*

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: When officer knows RS for stop ceases to exist, checking license and papers unreasonable

WA: DV order of protection can include disarming respondent

A proven domestic violence order of protection can provide justification for the respondent to give up his firearms under the Fourth Amendment and state constitution. In re Domestic Violence Prot. Ord. For Hernandez, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 1953 (Sep. 30, 2025) (unpublished).

Probable cause was shown that child pornography would be found on defendant’s cell phone. United States v. Johnston, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192356 (E.D. Va. Sep. 29, 2025).*

The arrest warrant here was obtained with no attempted showing of probable cause. The warrant was held until it was time to arrest defendant for a more serious crime, and the officers executing it weren’t the ones who got it in the first place. Therefore, the good faith exception applies. State v. Austin, 2025-Ohio-4543 (9th Dist. Sep. 30, 2025).* [This is just wrong. GF is one thing; but sanitizing it by ignorance in handing off to another?]

After a traffic stop, the smell of marijuana justified extending it. United States v. Sam, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192376 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 30, 2025).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: DV order of protection can include disarming respondent

D.Alaska: Sharing cell phone gives standing

Defendant shared the iPhone of another person, so he had standing to contest its search. United States v. Powers, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192621 (D. Alaska Sep. 30, 2025).

Defendants don’t get qualified immunity. The jury could conclude that more than minimal force was used against plaintiff. Heard v. Ass’n of Ark. Ctys. Risk Mgmt. Fund, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192615 (E.D. Ark. Sep. 30, 2025).*

“Meek-Freeman fails to plausibly allege a violation of the Fourth Amendment. In Hudson, the Supreme Court held that an inmate does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his prison cell. 468 U.S. at 530. Because Meek-Freeman does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell, Upole and Winters did not violate the Fourth Amendment when they searched his cell.” Freeman v. Moore, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192448 (D. Md. Sep. 30, 2025).*

Defendant officer accessing confidential information through misuse of police resources doesn’t get qualified immunity. Taylor v. Hooven, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193226 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 30, 2025).*

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Sharing cell phone gives standing

E.D.Wis.: Geofence warrant slightly different than Chatrie still in good faith

This geofence warrant was slightly different than Chatrie’s. Still, the good faith exception applies. “In this case, law enforcement acted pursuant to a warrant that was not so facially deficient that the executing officers could not reasonably presume it to be valid. The inquiry is ‘whether the officer could have reasonably believed the materials presented to the magistrate judge … were sufficient to establish probable cause.’ … It is reasonable for law enforcement to have believed the Timing Advance warrant appropriately authorized them to obtain the cell site data described in Attachments A and B. Dickerson’s motion to suppress was properly denied because the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies.” United States v. Dickerson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192861 (E.D. Wis. Sep. 30, 2025).

By the time of the stop, the officers already had probable cause to believe there were drugs in the car. “Though there could have been a non-criminal reason for all of this conduct, the officers were not obligated to ascribe innocent explanations to it.” United States v. Hicks, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193676 (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2025).*

2255 petitioner doesn’t show ineffective assistance of counsel for not properly challenging two searches before his guilty plea because they were valid searches. United States v. Peterson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193615 (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2025).*

Posted in Automobile exception, geofence, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Geofence warrant slightly different than Chatrie still in good faith

TX4: Bullet holes in truck justified its seizure for SW

Plain view of bullet holes in defendant’s truck justified its seizure and transport to police impound lot where it was searched with a warrant. Lee v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7569 (Tex. App. – San Antonio Sep. 30, 2025).

The searches of defendant’s cars were justified by the automobile exception and that moots out his search warrant claim and Franks challenge. United States v. Henderson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191965 (W.D. Wash. Sep. 29, 2025).

“Applying these principles, the Court concludes that the warrants were supported by probable cause. The warrant applications described the discovery of a dead body in Lewis’s trailer, along with observations from both Standish and Detective Green indicating potential criminal activity. Standish observed that the body showed evidence of violence and looked ‘beaten up.’ Based on his initial investigation, Detective Green indicated that the death ‘may have been the result of foul play.’ In assessing whether probable cause existed to believe a homicide occurred, the court was entitled to consider Detective Green’s 15 years of law enforcement experience.” United States v. Lewis, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191941 (D. Mont. Sep. 29, 2025).*

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on TX4: Bullet holes in truck justified its seizure for SW

OH5: SW saved by GFE even if issuing court lacked jurisdiction

The good faith exception applies even if the Common Pleas court lacked jurisdiction to issue a warrant for a Dropbox account in another jurisdiction. State v. Wharton, 2025-Ohio-4485, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 3295 (5th Dist. Sep. 25, 2025).

Summary judgment denied defendant officers. “Under these circumstances, Defendants have not met their heavy burden to show that, as a matter of law, there was an objectively reasonable basis to conclude that a warrantless entry was immediately necessary to protect anyone from serious harm.” I.R. v. Young, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189502 (C.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2025).*

Petitioner’s due process claim against immediate deportation resolves her case at this stage of the proceedings, so the Fourth Amendment claim doesn’t have to be decided yet. Vasquez v. Turek, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190746 (D. Vt. Sep. 25, 2025).*

Defendant failed to make a sufficient Franks offer of proof in her motion to suppress the search for her BAC. Even so, on the merits, a Franks hearing was held and the allegedly false statements had no bearing on the ultimate probable cause question. Rodriguez-Garza v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7568 (Tex. App. – San Antonio Sep. 30, 2025).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on OH5: SW saved by GFE even if issuing court lacked jurisdiction

LAT: The 4th Amendment will no longer protect you

LAT: The 4th Amendment will no longer protect you by Daniel Harawa & Kate Weisburd:

Continue reading
Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LAT: The 4th Amendment will no longer protect you

E.D.Mich.: Someone else’s search doesn’t affect defendant

Defendant has no standing to challenge the search of others that affected him, a theory rejected in Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 171-172 (1969). United States v. Phillips, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190766 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 26, 2025).

The officers had arguable probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest. “Although Vasquez’s description did not completely line up with Archangel’s height and age, Vinogradov and Crowder were able to view the perpetrators and judge their ages on surveillance footage from the second Subway robbery. … The detectives also saw a composite sketch prepared by a sketch artist. Archangel’s co-defendant, Welch, implicated Archangel and stated that Archangel looked like the person in the composite sketch. … The Mazda Protégé used at the scene of the crimes was located at the apartment complex where Archangel resided. … The detectives found the murder weapon and Archangel’s identification card inside the apartment in which Archangel resided. … As shown in the booking photographs taken in 2017, Archangel also had a scar under his eye similar to the one Dent described on the shooter. …” Archangel v. City of Houston, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190656 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2025).*

Posted in Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Someone else’s search doesn’t affect defendant

CA2: RS for stop for not pulling over for emergency vehicle

Stop was valid for failing to move over for an emergency vehicle on the side of the road. United States v. Overton, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 25125 (2d Cir. Sep. 29, 2025).*

Smell of marijuana from defendant’s car was probable cause for a search. United States v. Moore, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189623 (W.D. La. Sep. 8, 2025).*

“Consequently, this Court finds that the search warrant affidavit did not give rise to probable cause to search both residences. However, for the reasons that follow, this Court finds that the good-faith exception to the warrant applies.” But, it is not so obviously lacking in probable cause. United States v. Sloma, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189641 (W.D. Mo. Sep. 8, 2025).*

Remand not required. Inevitable discovery applies in any event. State v. St. Amant, 2025 La. App. LEXIS 1808 (La. App. 5 Cir Sep. 24, 2025).*

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: RS for stop for not pulling over for emergency vehicle

NYTimes: ‘Biometric Exit’ Quietly Expands Across U.S. Airports, Unnerving Some

NYTimes: ‘Biometric Exit’ Quietly Expands Across U.S. Airports, Unnerving Some by Claire Fahy (“René Rodriguez accompanied his daughter to Ireland last month as she prepared for a fall semester abroad. As he boarded the flight from Boston Logan International Airport to Shannon Airport, he found two federal officers in the Jetway taking photos of passengers with their cellphones … Those officers were part of an expanding federal program called biometric exit, which involves taking photos of passengers leaving the country and applying facial recognition technology to ensure that travelers match their identification documents. This process is known as facial comparison. For foreign nationals, the photos can remain in a database for up to 75 years. For U.S. citizens, the photos are matched to their passports and deleted within 12 hours, according to the Department of Homeland Security. On Sept. 15, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs approved a proposed rule, clearing the way for the program to expand to all airports, seaports and land crossings across the country. While the approval formalized the expansion, in reality the program has been growing for years and is now in use at dozens of airports and at seaports.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYTimes: ‘Biometric Exit’ Quietly Expands Across U.S. Airports, Unnerving Some

D.Neb.: Southwest employee wasn’t acting as govt agent in inventorying a suitcase and finding drugs

Defendant tried to retrieve a suitcase from Southwest Airlines in Omaha while not having been on a flight or having a claim check. The suspected bag arrived on the next flight from Phoenix, and it was taken by a SWA employee, locked away, and inventoried according to airline policies. Drugs were found. There’s no proof that the airline employee was acting as a governmental agent at the time of the search. United States v. Wells, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190697 (D. Neb. Aug. 8, 2025).

Even if the first warrant was invalid because of allegedly involuntary statements, it was separable from the second for another place based on other information. And the statements weren’t involuntary anyway. Denied. United States v. Panetti, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189891 (D. Minn. Sep. 26, 2025).*

The court disagrees that defendant was blocked in and “seized” on an apartment parking lot. Then there was a plain view. State v. Vargas, 2025-Ohio-4482 (2d Dist. Sep. 26, 2025).*

There was probable cause for defendant’s stop for a traffic offense. The smell of marijuana from the car and defendant’s admissions justified the vehicle search. State v. Waters, 2025-Ohio-4479 (1st Dist. Sep. 26, 2025).*

Posted in Airport searches, Independent source, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Southwest employee wasn’t acting as govt agent in inventorying a suitcase and finding drugs

PA: Whether an area is “high crime” for RS purposes needs to be evaluated with caution

“We granted discretionary review to consider the quantum of evidence necessary to prove an area is high in crime, such that a suppression court may properly consider that fact among the totality of the circumstances when assessing whether reasonable suspicion existed at the time of a stop. More specifically, appellant Anthony Lewis asks us to impose a strict, multi-element test on the Commonwealth anytime it wishes to designate the scene of a stop as a “high-crime area.” We decline the invitation. For the reasons that follow, we leave it to the discretion of suppression courts to determine whether the Commonwealth has proven an area is high in crime, as well as how much weight to assign to this factor. In so doing, we urge suppression courts to review high-crime area designations with caution and emphasize that merely intoning buzzwords is never sufficient to prove an area is high in crime. Applying these principles to this case, we find the evidence supports the suppression court’s conclusion that the scene of the stop was a high-crime area. We further hold the police had reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory detention based on the totality of the circumstances, including the high-crime nature of the area. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the Superior Court upholding the denial of suppression.” Commonwealth v. Lewis, 2025 Pa. LEXIS 1498 (Sep. 25, 2025).

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Whether an area is “high crime” for RS purposes needs to be evaluated with caution

CA11: Officers reasonably concluded that this was one residence without apartments

“At the time the officers swore out and executed the warrant, the officers believed 4279 Violet Circle was a single-family home that Schmitz occupied.” The officers’ investigation for months never indicated that the premises included three efficiency apartments. “In sum, Schmitz has failed to show that the officers in this case knew or should have known that 4279 Violet Circle was a multi-unit residence. Indeed, the record reflects that officers reasonably believed, based on a reasonable investigation, that the residence was a single-family home when they sought the first search warrant. Accordingly, the warrant was valid.” United States v. Schmitz, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24903 (11th Cir. Sep. 25, 2025).

Plaintiffs prevailed in the wrongful seizure claim and the jury awarded $5,000, $1, and $10,000 in punitives. This supported an attorney’s fees award of $356,405 and costs of $2,266.55. The settlement offer was $80,000. (The top hourly rate was $500 then adjusted for various things.) Cremeans v. Taczak, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190283 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 26, 2025).*

Defendant’s driving showed a traffic offense and, during the stop, the occupants feigned being asleep. This was on a corridor of immigrant smuggling, and it all added up to reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. United States v. Bohn, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190012 (D. Ariz. Sep. 25, 2025).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Officers reasonably concluded that this was one residence without apartments

OH5: Alleged jurisdictional defect in warrant issuance didn’t undermine PC; no dispute as to that

Alleged defects in which court should or could issue this particular warrant was subject to the good faith exception. There was no contention that the affidavit for warrant lacked probable cause. State v. Wharton, 2025-Ohio-4485 (5th Dist. Sep. 25, 2025).

Defendant relies on more than just his name in the affidavit as a resident to show his standing. He actually showed a connection. Otherwise, the affidavit is based on probable cause with nexus, and the good faith exception applied. United States v. Sullivan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190320 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 26, 2025).*

The fact two officers arriving at the scene separately responded to the threat differently doesn’t mean they don’t get qualified immunity. On these facts, they reasonably concluded there was a threat of harm from decedent waving a gun and threatening them and others. Their bodycams showed it all. “The circumstance confronting Offerman and McQuay, however, was at most on the ‘hazy border between excessive and acceptable force,’ which demands an analog in case law. Kisela, 584 U.S. at 105 (quotation omitted). At the time of the shooting, it is undisputed that the officers had a reasonable belief that Pam had (1) not been complying with commands for approximately 15 seconds, (2) pointed his gun at Geier, (3) pointed his weapon at Geier’s dog, (4) tried to enter her home, and (5) put his hands in his pockets when he faced the officers. Then, before the fatal shot, the officers reasonably believed he produced a firearm and began to raise it toward McQuay. Certainly, some reasonable officers would have thought Pam posed an imminent serious threat in these circumstances, which would make the use of deadly force reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Reichle, 566 U.S. at 663-65.” Pam v. City of Evansville, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 25017 (7th Cir. Sep. 26, 2025).*

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on OH5: Alleged jurisdictional defect in warrant issuance didn’t undermine PC; no dispute as to that

D.S.C.: Police and issuing magistrate having same address doesn’t make judge not neutral and detached

Just because the issuing magistrate and the police department share the same address does not prove that the magistrate was not neutral and detached. More is required. Lafoy v. O’Brien, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190411 (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2025).

“Even in reviewing Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint in the light most favorable to it, it alleges that it willingly, even if begrudgingly and disapprovingly, provided Detective Robinson the firearms and other items that he requested. Such consensual compliance with an investigation does not violate the Fourth Amendment.” Krasner Loan Co., Inc. v. Ferraris, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190416 (W.D. Tenn. Sep. 8, 2025).*

“Here, the trial court determined that no exigent circumstances justified the warrantless entry into the Residence. That determination is supported by competent, credible evidence. Officer Schaaf testified that police remained outside for more than an hour before entering, and that the decision to enter was made only after consultation with a superior officer. … The trial court also found that no cries for help were heard, no blood or bullet holes were observed on the residence, and no other objective indicators suggested anyone inside required immediate assistance. While there may have been movement or noise coming from within the Residence, we find such benign circumstances do not, without more, support that immediate aid was required within the Residence sufficient to justify warrantless entry.” State v. Reynolds, 2025-Ohio-4490 (5th Dist. Sep. 26, 2025).*

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Police and issuing magistrate having same address doesn’t make judge not neutral and detached

LAT: Veteran U.S. attorney in California insisted Border Patrol follow a court order. Then she was fired.

LAT: Veteran U.S. attorney in California insisted Border Patrol follow a court order. Then she was fired. By Jessica Garrison (“The acting U.S. attorney in Sacramento has said she was fired after telling the Border Patrol chief in charge of immigration raids in California that his agents were not allowed to arrest people without probable cause in the Central Valley. Michele Beckwith, a career prosecutor who was made the acting U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of California earlier this year, told the New York Times that she was let go after she warned Gregory Bovino, chief of the Border Patrol’s El Centro Sector, that a court injunction blocked him from carrying out indiscriminate immigration raids in Sacramento.”)

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on LAT: Veteran U.S. attorney in California insisted Border Patrol follow a court order. Then she was fired.

AR: Deficient SW affidavit cured by additional testimony

The affidavit for warrant was deficient, but it was adequately supplemented by testimony from the officer about grooming that would have been on his cell phone. Also, the good faith exception applies. Vasquez v. State, 2025 Ark. 134 (Sep. 25, 2025).

Without an enforcement action on a subpoena, the subpoena isn’t ripe for judicial review. Khan v. McDonald, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189149 (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2025).*

No good cause for filing an out of time motion to suppress is shown. Even if there was, it would be denied on the merits because there was reasonable suspicion for the stop. United States v. York, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187397 (N.D. Iowa Sep. 24, 2025).*

Posted in Good faith exception, Oath or affirmation, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Deficient SW affidavit cured by additional testimony

CA11: Police shooting and hitting a car is a 4A seizure

Police shooting at and hitting a car is a Fourth Amendment seizure, drawing from a common law case that striking a horse is the same as striking the rider. Watkins v. Davis, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24904 (11th Cir. Sep. 25, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Police shooting and hitting a car is a 4A seizure

AP: Chicago approves $90M payout over disgraced ex-sergeant who framed hundreds for drug crimes

AP: Chicago approves $90M payout over disgraced ex-sergeant who framed hundreds for drug crimes by Christine Fernando (“The Chicago City Council on Thursday unanimously approved a $90 million settlement for nearly 200 civil rights violations involving a notorious former police sergeant who framed people for drug crimes they didn’t commit in one of the biggest police misconduct scandals in the city’s history. The groundbreaking deal closes out 176 lawsuits involving 180 wrongfully convicted people who spent close to 200 years combined behind bars, marking an end to one of the Chicago Police Department’s darkest chapters. Disgraced former police Sgt. Ronald Watts and the unit he led for nearly a decade until 2012 was accused of planting drugs on suspects, falsifying police reports and falsely accusing housing project residents and others of drug crimes unless they paid the officers off.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on AP: Chicago approves $90M payout over disgraced ex-sergeant who framed hundreds for drug crimes