Category Archives: Reasonableness

D.P.R.: Nexus to CSLI would show who had the phone to connect it to crime

Defendant had standing to contest a search of this cell phone. While he didn’t attach an affidavit, the motion and other papers say it’s his, as does the consent form. Nothing suggests it’s not. The police got a warrant out … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Nexus, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Nexus to CSLI would show who had the phone to connect it to crime

S.D.Tex.: Judge shopping SW request noted, and denied again

It appears to this USMJ that the government is judge shopping. After denial of a warrant request, the government reapplied which was first assigned to another USMJ who transferred it here. Rejected again for the same reason. Defect not cured. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Judge shopping SW request noted, and denied again

CA8: In a consent search of a car, picking up cell phone and seeing lit screen wasn’t an unreasonable search

“Did Trooper Rorie’s 20 seconds of questioning and request for consent prolong the stop beyond the time needed to complete the remaining tasks of the traffic stop? We hold that it did not. The brief duration of the inquiry within … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonableness, Search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA8: In a consent search of a car, picking up cell phone and seeing lit screen wasn’t an unreasonable search

S.D.W.Va.: Paying “rent” in drugs is a business transaction didn’t give a REP here

Paying daily “rent” in drugs is a business transaction without standing. “Although Jackson was an overnight guest insofar as he slept on the couch in the living room, he told law enforcement officers in his interview that he paid McCallister … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Paying “rent” in drugs is a business transaction didn’t give a REP here

D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

Defendant’s Franks motion fails because the government can justify a warrantless search of the vehicle under the automobile exception. United States v. Childs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101370 (D.N.J. May 28, 2025). Plaintiff’s false arrest claim isn’t barred by Heck, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

FL1: Judge issuing SW not barred from presiding over trial

Reviewing search warrant applications is a core function of a judicial officer, and that does not qualify as an improper ex parte communication requiring the trial judge to recuse. Writ of prohibition denied. Adelson v. State, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on FL1: Judge issuing SW not barred from presiding over trial

D.Alaska: Despite SW affidavit’s failures, search of car otherwise valid under automobile exception

The showing for the search warrant for defendant’s car and cell phone was completely deficient. As to the car, its search is sustained under the automobile exception instead, but the phone extraction is suppressed. United States v. Carlton, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Despite SW affidavit’s failures, search of car otherwise valid under automobile exception

E.D.Ky.: SW affidavit failed to show PC for search of house, but it wasn’t so lacking the GFE doesn’t apply

The affidavit for search warrant here was based on suspicious circumstances but doesn’t show nexus to defendant’s house that he was engaging in drug trafficking from there just from living there. “Ultimately, the evidence in the affidavit did not create … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: SW affidavit failed to show PC for search of house, but it wasn’t so lacking the GFE doesn’t apply

D.Neb.: Officer asking same question three different ways didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

Asking the same question of defendant a different way three times while doing the traffic citation did not unreasonably prolong the stop. The officer said he was not trying to be “robotic” sounding. United States v. Burns, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Officer asking same question three different ways didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

D.P.R.: Officers’ reliance on differing versions of weapons law was objectively reasonable

The Spanish and English versions of a section of the Puerto Rico Weapons Law differ with “and” and “or” and reliance on whichever is objectively reasonable under Heien. United States v. Rosa-Ufred, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49334 (D.P.R. Mar. 14, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Officers’ reliance on differing versions of weapons law was objectively reasonable

WA: There was an objective basis for this stop even if with pretext

There was an objective basis for defendant’s stop, even if the officer had subjective motives. State v. Olson, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 423 (Mar. 11, 2025).* Defendant was in prison for about 20 years and there were phone calls between … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on WA: There was an objective basis for this stop even if with pretext

M.D.Tenn.: State court’s order permitting entry past a privacy fence to serve civil process made entry reasonable

A state court order that gave officers permission to enter past plaintiff’s privacy fence to serve him with a summons was sufficient to grant them at least qualified immunity or was reasonable for the entry alleged to be in violation … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: State court’s order permitting entry past a privacy fence to serve civil process made entry reasonable

CA11: The questions that extended the stop were for officer safety and thus reasonable

The questions here alleged to have prolonged the stop were primarily related to officer safety and weapons and not drugs. Therefore, they were reasonable. United States v. Green, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 3856 (11th Cir. Feb. 20, 2025). There was … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: The questions that extended the stop were for officer safety and thus reasonable

OK: Officer outside territorial jurisdiction isn’t a 4A issue

An officer outside his territorial jurisdiction making an arrest does not implicate the Fourth Amendment. Virginia v. Moore. “As previously stated, Appellant does not challenge that Morgan had probable cause to stop him, or that the search of his vehicle … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OK: Officer outside territorial jurisdiction isn’t a 4A issue

CA7: No “rule of thumb” for the Rodriguez moment

There’s no specific amount of time to elapse for a stop to be unreasonable under Rodriguez. All things considered, this was reasonable for six minutes. Other cases in this circuit have upheld them at 14 minutes. United States v. Devalois, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: No “rule of thumb” for the Rodriguez moment

NV: Not IAC to not object to CSLI business records after motion to suppress lost

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not objecting to the CSLI records which were coming in in any event as business records. He’d objected before trial to the search and lost, and that was argued on direct appeal and lost. State … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NV: Not IAC to not object to CSLI business records after motion to suppress lost

D.P.R.: State nighttime search rule on state warrant inapplicable in federal court

The fact a state nighttime search warrant doesn’t comply with state law doesn’t matter in federal court. It’s whether Rule 41 and the Fourth Amendment were complied with. Then, the defendant has to show prejudice. Also, the fact defendant had … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.P.R.: State nighttime search rule on state warrant inapplicable in federal court

S.D.Ala.: Failure to timely make SW return under state law not a 4A issue

The fact the search warrant paperwork wasn’t returned on time which made it void under state law isn’t relevant under the Fourth Amendment in federal court. Jackson v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235912 (S.D. Ala. Dec. 4, 2024), … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonableness, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: Failure to timely make SW return under state law not a 4A issue

E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

Officers were surveilling a van that they believed might have a connection to an unsolved homicide. They observed what appeared to be hand-to-hand drug transactions, and the van’s LPN was expired. They approached. There were others around the van, and … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Dog sniff, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

N.D.Cal.: Violation of CalECPA has nothing to do with federal rights

Violation of CalECPA has nothing to do with federal rights. United States v. Wenger, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1331 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2025). At the time of the warrant, it was not established that the accused had to have … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Violation of CalECPA has nothing to do with federal rights