D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

Defendant’s Franks motion fails because the government can justify a warrantless search of the vehicle under the automobile exception. United States v. Childs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101370 (D.N.J. May 28, 2025).

Plaintiff’s false arrest claim isn’t barred by Heck, but it is by statute of limitations. Allen v. Faulk, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100726 (S.D. Ind. May 27, 2025).*

Defendant passenger in a car was not seized when he fled in response to the officer’s show of authority. United States v. Bellomy, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100547 (E.D. Ky. May 28, 2025).*

Whether the state officer violated state law in arresting defendant wasn’t the question. He’s in federal court so the Fourth Amendment governs and the arrest was with probable cause. United States v. Stewart, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100548 (E.D. Ky. May 28, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.