Category Archives: Excessive force

CA10 doesn’t have to decide whether furtive movement alone supports vehicle protective sweep

Furtive movements alone may or may not be enough to justify a protective sweep of a car, a question this circuit has never decided. Here, however, there was the additional fact of a “slow roll” to a stop which was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10 doesn’t have to decide whether furtive movement alone supports vehicle protective sweep

W.D.Tenn.: Violation of police dept. vehicle chase policy doesn’t equate to a violation of the 4A

An alleged violation of department policy on police chases doesn’t equal a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Moore, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130238 (W.D. Tenn. July 27, 2023). Speeding and erratic driving justified the stop, and alcohol was seen … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Violation of police dept. vehicle chase policy doesn’t equate to a violation of the 4A

W.D.Va.: Info on def’s cell phone provided nexus for SW of house

Information on defendant’s cell phone linking him and Trafficker A also linked his home to the transactions and that showed nexus. United States v. Johnson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130082 (W.D. Va. July 27, 2023).* The information about defendant’s drug … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Nexus, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Info on def’s cell phone provided nexus for SW of house

DE: SW issuing magistrate not barred from hearing suppression motion

The suppression hearing judge is not disqualified just because he or she considered the affidavit and issued the search warrant. Willis v. State, 2023 Del. LEXIS 238 (July 24, 2023). Setting inaccuracies in the search warrant affidavit aside, there was … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DE: SW issuing magistrate not barred from hearing suppression motion

CA6: Unintended target of a police shooting, another officer, has a 4A seizure and excessive force claim

One officer fired a gun at a suspect inside a dwelling, apparently without aiming, and hit another officer. That was still a Fourth Amendment seizure of the person of the officer despite being an unintended target. Kilnapp v. City of … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Unintended target of a police shooting, another officer, has a 4A seizure and excessive force claim

D.Md.: Surveillance and bodycam video supported officer’s contention def had a firearm in sweatshirt pocket

The court viewed the CCTV and body cam videos (included in the opinion) and it’s apparent defendant had a gun in his sweatshirt pocket. “Not every bulge is a weapon,” but this one apparently was. That justified the frisk. United … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Md.: Surveillance and bodycam video supported officer’s contention def had a firearm in sweatshirt pocket

N.D.Ohio: Photo of premises in SW showed detached garage, and it was included because on curtilage

The warrant was particular when it showed a picture of the premises with the address. The photograph showed the detached garage on the curtilage. That was covered by the warrant, too. When the government raised standing in response to defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Photo of premises in SW showed detached garage, and it was included because on curtilage

DE: Where SW was for clothing worn in shooting, nexus shown to def’s home

Where the search warrant sought clothing worn during a shooting, nexus was shown to where defendant lived. State v. Johnson, 2023 Del. Super. LEXIS 324 (July 7, 2023). There was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest for harassment of another person. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Nexus, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on DE: Where SW was for clothing worn in shooting, nexus shown to def’s home

MO: Virginia v. Moore does not require officer see the crime to have PC for arrest outside jurisdiction

Virginia v. Moore does not require that an arresting officer personally have seen the act that led to the arrest outside the officer’s jurisdiction as long as there was probable cause. State v. Barton, 2023 Mo. LEXIS 183 (June 27, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on MO: Virginia v. Moore does not require officer see the crime to have PC for arrest outside jurisdiction

CA11: Inmate email has same 1A protection snail mail does

Prison email to family members is protected by the First Amendment. “Just as the Fourth Amendment protects against searches by technology unknown in the 18th century, see Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27, 34-38 (2001), the First Amendment protects … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, E-mail, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA11: Inmate email has same 1A protection snail mail does

NY Kings Co.: State can rely on circumstantial evidence to support CIs

“The district attorney can rely on circumstantial evidence to demonstrate an adequate basis of knowledge for the information conveyed …. But not in this case. The mere fact that the Warrants Squad arrested Lewis at the target location does not … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: State can rely on circumstantial evidence to support CIs

CA11: Three CIs with overlapping information corroborated each other

Three informants’ overlapping information corroborated one another such that establishing their veracity was unnecessary. The affidavit in support of the warrant contained enough indicia of probable cause that an officer’s reliance was not unreasonable as it sufficiently linked the residence … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA11: Three CIs with overlapping information corroborated each other

CA5: Officer gets QI for shooting into a car under these circumstances

In a case of shooting into a car, “In sum, plaintiffs have not pointed to sufficient authority clearly establishing that Coborn’s conduct violated the law under the specific circumstances he was facing, and thus he is entitled to qualified immunity.” … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Officer gets QI for shooting into a car under these circumstances

GA: Grant of Franks motion is subject to de novo review

The court erred in finding a Franks violation without considering whether the challenged representation in the warrant was made knowingly, intentionally, or in reckless disregard for the truth. On de novo review, that the trial court erred in finding there … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on GA: Grant of Franks motion is subject to de novo review

CA2: Protective sweep while SW being obtained saved by independent source doctrine

Officers conducted a protective sweep while a search warrant was in the process of being obtained, so the independent source rule applies. United States v. Schleede, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 11803 (2d Cir. May 15, 2023). Plaintiff didn’t state a … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Independent source | Comments Off on CA2: Protective sweep while SW being obtained saved by independent source doctrine

W.D.Wash.: Younger abstention bars suit over state prosecution and search

Plaintiff’s federal suit over his state search and prosecution is barred by Younger abstention. There’s no showing he can’t raise those issues in state court. Bailey v. City of Olympia Prosecutor, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80175 (W.D. Wash. May 8, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Younger abstention bars suit over state prosecution and search

CA8: Merely pointing a Taser not a seizure

Pointing a Taser at plaintiff was not a seizure. Pollreis v. Marzolf, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 10269 (8th Cir. Apr. 27, 2023). Even if possession of a firearm in a concealed carry state was not unlawful, smoking marijuana with a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Excessive force, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Merely pointing a Taser not a seizure

OH9: Growing house fire next door was exigency to clear def’s house

Defendant’s next door neighbor’s house caught on fire, and police at the scene acted reasonably in entering his house to clear it when the fire grew and they reasonably feared it would spread to the houses next door. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Border search, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing | Comments Off on OH9: Growing house fire next door was exigency to clear def’s house

PA: SW for flashlight app data on cell phone sustained

The affidavits for search warrant for this cell phone were overbroad as to what was sought lacking probable cause except for location data and use of the flashlight function. Defendant was accused of using the flashlight on his cell phone … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Excessive force, Overbreadth | Comments Off on PA: SW for flashlight app data on cell phone sustained

WA: Renter of hotel room could consent to search of room with co-occupants, but not of co-occupant’s stuff

“Here, Giberson was a guest in Goedker’s motel room. As a result, Goedker as the person renting the room had authority to give consent for law enforcement to search the room. … And even though Giberson was present, because he … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on WA: Renter of hotel room could consent to search of room with co-occupants, but not of co-occupant’s stuff