Category Archives: Excessive force

CA5: Psychological injuries can support a 4A claim; unintended shooting victim has claim

If the facts were resolved against the police here, they violated clearly-established Fourth Amendment law by unjustifiably shooting into an occupied house and hitting an intended victim. Also, psychological injuries may sustain a Fourth Amendment claim. No qualified immunity. Singleton … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Psychological injuries can support a 4A claim; unintended shooting victim has claim

CA9: Fact question shooting ptf’s decedent without warning who wasn’t posing threat was potentially unreasonable

The district court’s grant of qualified immunity is reversed. There are factual disputes for trial that the shooting death of plaintiff’s decedent was unreasonable because he presented no threat and was shot without warning. Calonge v. City of San Jose, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Fact question shooting ptf’s decedent without warning who wasn’t posing threat was potentially unreasonable

D.V.I.: 19 warning shots from USCG helicopter to effect stop of boat wasn’t unreasonable

The Coast Guard did not use unreasonable excessive force in firing 19 warning shots from a helicopter to get defendants to stop their boat. United States v. Menocal-Mero, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99881 (D.V.I. June 5, 2024). Viewing the bodycam, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Custody, Excessive force, Foreign searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.V.I.: 19 warning shots from USCG helicopter to effect stop of boat wasn’t unreasonable

CA11: Excessive force claim against HSI barred by Bivens/Egbert

Federal regulations permit FTCA actions for excessive force claims, so Bivens/Egbert bar this claim. Wimberly v. Selent, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 13557 (11th Cir. June 5, 2024). Defendant provided nothing to show he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA11: Excessive force claim against HSI barred by Bivens/Egbert

CA7: Officers’ fear force would be used against them was reasonable

“When the deputies encountered him, he appeared intoxicated; they reasonably feared that he might become dangerous, and he became so when, as Culley later admitted in state court, he lunged at them and resisted arrest before they pushed him to … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Officers’ fear force would be used against them was reasonable

CA7: Officer punching arrestee four times after arrestee punched him gets QI

“After Charles Brumitt struck Evansville Police Department Sergeant Sam Smith, Smith defended himself by punching Brumitt four times in the face, knocking him unconscious. Brumitt sued Smith under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting that Smith used excessive force in violation … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Officer punching arrestee four times after arrestee punched him gets QI

CA4: When PC and GFE are the issue on appeal, both have to be appealed or it’s waiver

“In his first claim, Juarez-Sanchez argues that two search warrants issued in this case were not supported by probable cause. Below, the district court rejected this argument and, in the alternative, held that the good faith exception to the exclusionary … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: When PC and GFE are the issue on appeal, both have to be appealed or it’s waiver

E.D.Ark.: Landlord and tenant refused rental property inspection and SW was validly issued and protected privacy interests

The renter of property has a Fourth Amendment right in the property under the city rental inspection code but not if a warrant is issued. Here, the owner and tenant refused inspection and entry, and the city obtained an administrative … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Landlord and tenant refused rental property inspection and SW was validly issued and protected privacy interests

UT: RS on a prior day was not RS for stop on day in question

Even assuming the officer had reasonable suspicion defendant was involved in a prior incident, he had no reasonable suspicion for stopping defendant this time. State v. Correa, 2024 UT App 69, 2024 Utah App. LEXIS 69 (May 9, 2024). Petitioner … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on UT: RS on a prior day was not RS for stop on day in question

MI: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases; constitutionality of use of drone for zoning enforcement not decided

In the Michigan zoning drone use case, the court finds that the exclusionary rule would not be applied in civil cases, so the constitutionality of use of the drone didn’t need to be decided. Long Lake Twp. v. Maxon, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Drones, Excessive force, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases; constitutionality of use of drone for zoning enforcement not decided

CA6: No QI for shooting a man obviously surrendering

Officers responded to an armed potentially suicidal man they found in his house. When commanded to show his hands he started to get down to the floor when he was shot. “A jury could find these actions would indicate to … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: No QI for shooting a man obviously surrendering

DE: Officers approaching men on a stoop at night with a police dog saying “nobody move” was a seizure

Officers approaching men on a stoop at 10 pm with a police dog and saying “nobody move” was a seizure. Here it was with reasonable suspicion based on a CI’s information that was detailed, reliable, and significantly corroborated. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on DE: Officers approaching men on a stoop at night with a police dog saying “nobody move” was a seizure

CO adopts Graham for state excessive force claims

Colorado adopts the Graham v. Connor standard for excessive force under state law. Plaintiff stated enough to overcome a motion to dismiss. Woodall v. Godfrey, 2024 COA 42 (Apr. 25, 2024).* “Scafidi’s ‘seizure’ was not unreasonable, because his arrest was … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on CO adopts Graham for state excessive force claims

CA9: Apparent drugs found in TSA screening were reasonably seized

The contents of defendant’s suitcase alerted TSA screeners that something was awry. When his suitcase was opened, there were two vacuum sealed bags inside that were obviously drugs – “a layperson would readily ascertain that the packages in Green’s suitcase … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches, Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA9: Apparent drugs found in TSA screening were reasonably seized

CA9: Asking detainee about parole status is reasonable

Asking a detainee about his parole status reasonably relates to officer safety and imposes a negligible burden on the detainee. United States v. Ramirez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 9388 (9th Cir. Apr. 18, 2024). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Asking detainee about parole status is reasonable

CA7: Hotel room vacated by tenant could be searched by hotel management

A hotel room search by the hotel manager after defendant’s tenancy expired was reasonable as a private search and under state law. He was also on parole, but the district court didn’t even mention that. United States v. Gay, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Private search | Comments Off on CA7: Hotel room vacated by tenant could be searched by hotel management

CA6 disagrees with CA7 on de minimis injuries under § 1983 force cases

“We end with two disclaimers. As for the first disclaimer, courts have suggested that § 1983 does not provide a cause of action for ‘trifling’ injuries—whether a plaintiff alleges a violation of the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, or any … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6 disagrees with CA7 on de minimis injuries under § 1983 force cases

MO: No duty of care owed by police to fleeing motorist

There was no duty owed to a fleeing motorist who killed himself and his passenger in flight. The police owed a duty to the rest of the locale to stop them. This was reasonable under Scott. Neil v. St. Louis … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on MO: No duty of care owed by police to fleeing motorist

Phila. Inquirer: Why did more than 1,000 people in the U.S. die after police subdued them with force that isn’t meant to kill?

Phila. Inquirer: Why did more than 1,000 people in the U.S. die after police subdued them with force that isn’t meant to kill? by Reese Dunklin, Ryan J. Foley, Jeff Martin, Jennifer McDermott, Holbrook Mohr, and John Seewer, Associated Press … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Phila. Inquirer: Why did more than 1,000 people in the U.S. die after police subdued them with force that isn’t meant to kill?

CA6: It’s clearly established that RS or PC required for a traffic stop

It was clearly established at the time that reasonable suspicion or probable cause was required for a traffic stop. Fact issues remain, so no qualified immunity. King v. City of Rockford, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7327 (6th Cir. Mar. 28, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: It’s clearly established that RS or PC required for a traffic stop