Category Archives: Excessive force

Reason: The Constitution Does Not Allow the President To Unilaterally Blow Suspected Drug Smugglers to Smithereens

Reason: The Constitution Does Not Allow the President To Unilaterally Blow Suspected Drug Smugglers to Smithereens by Sen. Rand Paul (“Somewhere off the coast of Venezuela, a speedboat with 11 people on board is blown to smithereens. Vice President J.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on Reason: The Constitution Does Not Allow the President To Unilaterally Blow Suspected Drug Smugglers to Smithereens

D.Alaska: Sharing cell phone gives standing

Defendant shared the iPhone of another person, so he had standing to contest its search. United States v. Powers, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192621 (D. Alaska Sep. 30, 2025). Defendants don’t get qualified immunity. The jury could conclude that more … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Sharing cell phone gives standing

OH5: Alleged jurisdictional defect in warrant issuance didn’t undermine PC; no dispute as to that

Alleged defects in which court should or could issue this particular warrant was subject to the good faith exception. There was no contention that the affidavit for warrant lacked probable cause. State v. Wharton, 2025-Ohio-4485 (5th Dist. Sep. 25, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on OH5: Alleged jurisdictional defect in warrant issuance didn’t undermine PC; no dispute as to that

Atlanta Black Star: ‘Eight Rounds After I Was on the Ground’: Texas Cops at the Wrong Home Opened Fire on Man Even After He Surrendered

Atlanta Black Star: ‘Eight Rounds After I Was on the Ground’: Texas Cops at the Wrong Home Opened Fire on Man Even After He Surrendered by Carlos Miller (“Another police blunder led to the shooting of a man in Texas … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Nighttime search | Comments Off on Atlanta Black Star: ‘Eight Rounds After I Was on the Ground’: Texas Cops at the Wrong Home Opened Fire on Man Even After He Surrendered

IA: RS for this DUI stop was the gait of def walking toward his car

Reasonable suspicion for this DUI stop was the gait of defendant walking toward his car. State v. Nockels, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 812 (Sep. 17, 2025). Plaintiff was hurt during police response to a domestic dispute. “Hoover filed this suit … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: RS for this DUI stop was the gait of def walking toward his car

E.D.Ark.: Parole search waiver included curtilage of house

Plaintiff’s parole search waiver for his house includes his curtilage. Kennedy v. White Cty., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180862 (E.D. Ark. Sep. 16, 2025). Admission of a photograph of defendant’s house taken from off the property did not violate the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Parole search waiver included curtilage of house

CA3: Cell phone owner voluntarily gave up passcode

Having voluntarily given up her cell phone passcode, she can’t suppress its contents. United States v. Curry, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 23865 (3d Cir. Sep. 16, 2025). Past detention for alleged unlawful reasons doesn’t give Art. III standing for possible … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Forfeiture, Privileges, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: Cell phone owner voluntarily gave up passcode

TX2: Asking for consent four times doesn’t make it coercive

The fact defendant was asked four times for consent doesn’t make it coercive. Arnold v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7228 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth Sep. 11, 2025). Velez finally contends that no reasonable officer could have concluded that … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Scope of search, Voluntariness | Comments Off on TX2: Asking for consent four times doesn’t make it coercive

W.D.Wis.: § 1983 search claim producing $4,000 damages verdict supported $84,690 in attorneys fees

Plaintiff’s § 1983 search claim produced a damages verdict for $500 compensatory and $3500 punitive. The attorney’s fees award of $84,690.00 is granted. Pfalzgraf v. Reisner, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168405 (W.D. Wis. Aug. 28, 2025). Cracked windshield and tinted … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: § 1983 search claim producing $4,000 damages verdict supported $84,690 in attorneys fees

LATimes: Immigration agent fires shots at vehicle with people inside in San Bernardino operation

LATimes: Immigration agent fires shots at vehicle with people inside in San Bernardino operation by Brittny Mejia. The officers claim shooting at the vehicle was in self-defense:

Posted in Excessive force, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on LATimes: Immigration agent fires shots at vehicle with people inside in San Bernardino operation

MS: The CIs were co-conspirators and eyewitnesses and could be credited

The three informants were co-conspirators, eyewitnesses, and participants in the crime, and their information could be credited for search warrant. Taylor v. State, 2025 Miss. App. LEXIS 292 (Aug. 12, 2025). Defendant’s 2255 re-raises his Fourth Amendment claim already rejected. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: The CIs were co-conspirators and eyewitnesses and could be credited

Louisville Courier Journal: Ex-LMPD detective Brett Hankison sentenced to 33 months in prison

Louisville Courier Journal: Ex-LMPD detective Brett Hankison sentenced to 33 months in prison by Josh Wood (“A federal judge sentenced former Louisville Police detective Brett Hankison to 33 months in prison for the shots he fired during the fatal 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Louisville Courier Journal: Ex-LMPD detective Brett Hankison sentenced to 33 months in prison

S.D.Ill.: Being a cash courier doesn’t establish standing

Giving a substantial amount of cash to a courier to take it from Arizona to Maryland doesn’t create standing. United States v. $549,860.00 in United States Currency, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131436 (S.D. Ill. July 10, 2025). Defendant’s place was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Anticipatory warrant, Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Being a cash courier doesn’t establish standing

CA3: Driveway was not curtilage

Defendant’s driveway was not curtilage, so his stop and ultimate search of the car was not in violation of the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Moses, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16484 (3d Cir. July 3, 2025). De minimis force, even … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Curtilage, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Driveway was not curtilage

CA11: Knee on the neck of nonresisting suspect [who happened to be innocent] was excessive

Plaintiff was at the wrong place at the wrong time of a threatened robbery. He was taken from his car at gunpoint and an officer held him down with a knee to the neck nearly asphyxiating him. While no case … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Knee on the neck of nonresisting suspect [who happened to be innocent] was excessive

S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

Defendant was parked at an intersection in the Bronx and was consuming marijuana in the car on the street, a state offense. The officer had the authority to conduct a search of the car even though he was likely only … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

N.D.Ill.: Particularity is a function of what’s known

“That said, specificity is ‘relative,’ and a warrant ‘need not be more specific than knowledge allows.’ United States v. Bishop, 910 F.3d 335, 338 (7th Cir. 2018). In other words, law enforcement is required to particularize a warrant only to … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Particularity, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Particularity is a function of what’s known

SD: Search incident to mental health hold was reasonable; container in pocket could be opened

Defendant was detained on a mental health hold and his pockets were searched. He didn’t contest the search, just the opening of a container, which was reasonable here. State v. Parris, 2025 S.D. 27 (June 13, 2025). Plaintiff’s decedent was … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Search incident, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on SD: Search incident to mental health hold was reasonable; container in pocket could be opened

OR: State didn’t develop alternative search theory just by mentioning it

The state didn’t sufficiently develop search incident as an alternative theory to sustain the search merely by mentioning it. State v. Ribota, 341 Or. App. 32 (June 4, 2025). There is a fact question for trial for excessive force, and … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on OR: State didn’t develop alternative search theory just by mentioning it

D.Md.: Delaying three years to indict after seizure compromised defense enough that speedy trial was violated

Defendant’s backpack was searched in 2017, but he wasn’t indicted until 2020, and his case lingered. The officer’s testimony about the search is hazy and inconclusive enough that the court finds cause to dismiss for a speedy trial violation. The … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Md.: Delaying three years to indict after seizure compromised defense enough that speedy trial was violated