SD: Search incident to mental health hold was reasonable; container in pocket could be opened

Defendant was detained on a mental health hold and his pockets were searched. He didn’t contest the search, just the opening of a container, which was reasonable here. State v. Parris, 2025 S.D. 27 (June 13, 2025).

Plaintiff’s decedent was high on PCP and actively resisting and thrashing around while handcuffed. Drive stunning him [using the Taser’s probes] was not unreasonable. Anderson v. Estrada, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 14673 (5th Cir. June 13, 2025).*

Defendant is charged with arson in interstate commerce. With tower dump warrants his cell phone was present in the area of nine of 18 fires when they happened. Then a tracking warrant was obtained for his vehicle. All were with probable cause. A Franks claim is denied because the asserted omission isn’t. United States v. Pricop, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112722 (D. Ariz. June 13, 2025).*

Plaintiff inmate has a possible administrative remedy, but no Fourth Amendment claim. Baltas v. Snyder, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112799 (D. Conn. June 13, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, Search incident, Tracking warrant. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.