Daily Archives: September 7, 2026

MT: Semi-conscious injured driver couldn’t consent to BAC blood draw

Defendant was seriously injured in a car wreck and was at best semi-conscious. She could not consent to a DUI blood draw. Suppression order affirmed. State v. Laroque, 2026 MT 209 (Sept. 1, 2026). The totality of circumstances showed defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, DNA, Drug or alcohol testing, Independent source, Scope of search | Comments Off on MT: Semi-conscious injured driver couldn’t consent to BAC blood draw

FL2: No 4A right to avoid public records disclosure after suppression of search

Florida has constitutional and statutory public records laws. A target of a search doesn’t have a Fourth Amendment right to prevent public disclosure of the product of a search of his place and things even when the search was unlawful. … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on FL2: No 4A right to avoid public records disclosure after suppression of search

W.D.Wash.: No 2255 discovery of SW materials based on mere speculation

In this 2255, petitioner doesn’t get discovery of his search warrant materials. “The Government responds that Wilson ‘has failed to provide good cause as to why he is entitled to the materials that he requests’ and instead, he ‘only speculates … Continue reading →

Posted in Discovery, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: No 2255 discovery of SW materials based on mere speculation

CA4: No REP in stolen car without showing it was obtained innocently

One has no reasonable expectation of privacy in a stolen vehicle, unless he can show he acquired it innocently. United States v. Starner, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 26653 (4th Cir. Aug. 31, 2026). In this soliciting minors for sex case, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA4: No REP in stolen car without showing it was obtained innocently

CA3: Officers made reasonable effort to determine whether house was multi-use

Defendant lived on the second floor of a house that was not zoned as an apartment building and had no outward appearance there were separate residences. The warrant was for the whole place. The downstairs resident wasn’t the person they … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA3: Officers made reasonable effort to determine whether house was multi-use