TX6: Def abandoned cell phone; PC for SW didn’t matter

Defendant abandoned his cell phone, and then the police got a warrant for it. Still, it’s abandonment. Williams v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 5777 (Tex. App. – Texarkana Aug. 5, 2025).*

The evidence supported the district court’s conclusion there was a factual basis for defendant’s stop for not signaling a turn soon enough. United States v. Cardinale, 24-2784 (8th Cir. Aug. 4, 2025).*

A tracking warrant is for movement, not contents of a vehicle. “Based on the totality of the circumstances, the Court concludes that the Tracking Affidavit set forth sufficient facts to lead a reasonably prudent person to believe there was a fair probability that tracking the Vehicle’s location may lead to evidence of criminal activity. Notman, 831 F.3d at 1088.” United States v. Verser, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149701 (D. Minn. June 16, 2025).*

A film over the LPN making it harder to read justified this stop. United States v. Harris, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149685 (E.D. Tex. July 3, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Tracking warrant. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.