Category Archives: Informant hearsay

N.D.Ga.: Having cell phone at scene of crime justifies its seizure under plain view

There was justification for the plain view seizure of defendant’s cell phone when it came to the scene of the crime with him. United States v. Dulaney, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151204 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 23, 2024).* “Saldana-Alaniz fails to … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Having cell phone at scene of crime justifies its seizure under plain view

N.D.Ohio: Cell phone next to seized drugs was nexus for SW

“In sum, the search warrant affidavit contained considerably more than the mere fact that Bell was arrested with the cell phone on his person. Rather, law enforcement found the cell phone on Bell’s person near ‘the very drugs’ he has … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Cell phone next to seized drugs was nexus for SW

W.D.Mo.: Def didn’t show he was driving overdue rented car with anyone’s permission

Defendant had no standing in the rented car he was driving. It was rented by another person, and it had not been timely returned. He didn’t show that he was driving with anyone’s permission. United States v. Manning, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Def didn’t show he was driving overdue rented car with anyone’s permission

CA11: RS existed on the totality of the stop even though the officer did not intend to issue a traffic ticket

Reasonable suspicion developed to continue the stop even though the officer didn’t intend to issue a traffic ticket. United States v. Martinez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17675 (11th Cir. July 18, 2024). 2255 petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim that … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: RS existed on the totality of the stop even though the officer did not intend to issue a traffic ticket

CO: Drunk driving tip line report was not anonymous

A report through a drunk driving tip line was not anonymous. Even if it were, the officer developed reasonable suspicion before the stop. People v. Dacus, 2024 CO 51, 2024 Colo. LEXIS 565 (June 24, 2024).* Defendant’s arrest on a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CO: Drunk driving tip line report was not anonymous

WA: Using software to search a cell phone doesn’t violate particularity

Use of software to search a cell phone did not violate the particularity of the warrant. The Fourth Amendment and the state constitution are intended to prevent a general rummaging, and the use of software facilitates people not looking at … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Particularity | Comments Off on WA: Using software to search a cell phone doesn’t violate particularity

CA9: 4A claim of manufactured PC is a new form of Bivens claim and is barred

Plaintiff’s complaint against DHS that agents fabricated probable cause to have him prosecuted is a new form of claim Bivens will not recognize. Sheikh v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 16441 (9th Cir. July 5, 2024). … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: 4A claim of manufactured PC is a new form of Bivens claim and is barred

CA7: Drug dog’s 59% success rate still PC

The fact the drug dog here had only a 59% (or 80%) success rate is still probable cause. The fact a dog can’t tell the difference between legal and illegal cannabis is of no moment. It’s still probable cause. United … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA7: Drug dog’s 59% success rate still PC

MT: Entry onto def’s rural land past “Posted” and “No Trespassing” signs to issue a traffic citation was unreasonable

Entry onto defendant’s rural land past “Posted” and “No Trespassing” signs to issue a traffic citation was unreasonable. Montanans have a heightened expectation of privacy in their posted rural lands. State v. Lanchantin, 2024 MT 129 (June 18, 2024). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, State constitution, Trespass | Comments Off on MT: Entry onto def’s rural land past “Posted” and “No Trespassing” signs to issue a traffic citation was unreasonable

CA2: Unlicensed and uninsured motorcycle parked on street was subject to community caretaking function when def was arrested

“Because Owens’s motorcycle was on a public street with no displayed license plate and was uninsured, the community caretaking function applied, even though it was parked at the time of his arrest.” Owens v. Fitzgerald, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 12292 … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Community caretaking function, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA2: Unlicensed and uninsured motorcycle parked on street was subject to community caretaking function when def was arrested

D.Mont.: 30-day delay in getting SW for seized storage building not unreasonable

In a kidnapping case, the 30-day delay in seeking a search warrant for defendant’s storage unit after its seizure was not unreasonable. “The Court next considers the degree to which the seizure and retention of Lepe’s storage unit and its … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Mont.: 30-day delay in getting SW for seized storage building not unreasonable

W.D.Ark.: Parole search waiver moots lack of PC argument

Defendant was subject to a state warrantless parole search waiver, so the existence of probable cause to support the warrant is moot. United States v. Strickland, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73938 (W.D. Ark. Apr. 23, 2024).* “Camara argues that the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay, Mootness, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Parole search waiver moots lack of PC argument

W.D.N.C.: Smell of alcohol alone doesn’t permit search for open container

The smell of alcohol alone wasn’t justification for a search of defendant’s car for an open container. United States v. Gibson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70389 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2024). Petitioner’s claim defense counsel was ineffective for not seeking the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Smell of alcohol alone doesn’t permit search for open container

W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to say CI was reliable when the facts and circumstances alleged showed it

Defendant’s allegations of the police not saying in the warrant affidavit the CI was reliable doesn’t matter because the affidavit for warrant shows otherwise why the CI was credited. There was probable cause. To the extent this would be considered … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to say CI was reliable when the facts and circumstances alleged showed it

D.C.Cir.: Telling def to “chill out” not a seizure

“Officer Jones never made such a show of authority; he simply told Hagan, while in uniform and in a ‘conversational tone,’ to ‘chill out.’ … Jones neither told Hagan to stop nor asked him any questions. An approach by a … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Telling def to “chill out” not a seizure

D.Minn.: Hidden compartment could be searched under automobile exception

Under the automobile exception, a search of a compartment underneath the dashboard paneling was reasonable. United States v. Payton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57065 (D. Minn. Mar. 29, 2024).* The search issues on appeal weren’t the issues in the trial … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Scope of search, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Hidden compartment could be searched under automobile exception

E.D.N.Y.: Def gets Franks but govt also gets to show justification for protective sweep

There were mistakes in the affidavit that at least gets defendant a Franks hearing. The government, however, will get to provide more information about the justification for a protective sweep which is not confined to the four corners. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def gets Franks but govt also gets to show justification for protective sweep

D.Minn.: Regular CI had “extensive knowledge of street gangs, firearms, and narcotics distribution”; there was PC

The CI had “extensive knowledge of street gangs, firearms, and narcotics distribution,” and he’d been providing information for three months. The officers corroborated what they could. What little omissions there were in the affidavit weren’t material to the finding of … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Regular CI had “extensive knowledge of street gangs, firearms, and narcotics distribution”; there was PC

MA: “Any persons present” clause in SW permitted search of one who left before search but hung around

“We conclude that a search warrant authorizing a search of ‘any person present’ allows a search of any person present in the property to be searched during the execution of the search warrant, including persons present during the execution but … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Scope of search | Comments Off on MA: “Any persons present” clause in SW permitted search of one who left before search but hung around

W.D.Pa.: Prisoners stated 4A claim for recording of attorney-client calls

Prison inmates stated a claim where their prison calls to their lawyers were recorded by the provider without their knowledge. “ICS’ contention that the recording here was proper because inmates have a lowered expectation of privacy is inapplicable. First, while … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Prisoners stated 4A claim for recording of attorney-client calls