Category Archives: Standing

DC: Accepting a law license is consent to trust account subpoenas

Being a lawyer with a trust account, lawyer’s consent to subpoenas for their trust account. The lawyer’s argument that it’s an unreasonable search is frivolous. In re Doman, 2024 D.C. App. LEXIS 191 (May 16, 2024). Defendant didn’t show standing … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Franks doctrine, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on DC: Accepting a law license is consent to trust account subpoenas

LA5: No standing to challenge search of shooting victim’s cell phone in def’s possession

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of his shooting victim’s cell phone. Also, by statute the search of the phone more than 10 days after seizure was reasonable. State v. Lowry, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 804 (La. App. 5 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA5: No standing to challenge search of shooting victim’s cell phone in def’s possession

100 years ago today, abandonment, open fields, and maybe even standing in another’s land was decided

Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57, 58-59, 44 S. Ct. 445, 68 L. Ed. 2d 898 (1924): The officers had no warrant for search or arrest, and it is contended that this made their evidence inadmissible, it being assumed, on the … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Open fields, Standing | Comments Off on 100 years ago today, abandonment, open fields, and maybe even standing in another’s land was decided

M.D.Pa.: Def was neither shipper nor recipient of USPS parcel, so he had no standing in it

Defendant was neither the shipper nor recipient of a USPS parcel with drugs in it, opened six weeks after it was unclaimed. He had no standing in it. United States v. Bell, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78182 (M.D. Pa. Apr. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory, Mail and packages, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Def was neither shipper nor recipient of USPS parcel, so he had no standing in it

CA7: No standing in a stolen car; PC anyway for automobile exception

Defendant was driving a stolen car. He had no standing in it. Besides, the search was good under the automobile exception with probable cause. United States v. Ostrum, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 10076 (7th Cir. Apr. 25, 2024). The Labor … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Nexus, Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA7: No standing in a stolen car; PC anyway for automobile exception

CA5: Deficient privilege log after records search was waiver

After voluminous records were seized with a warrant, defendant’s privilege log was deficient to identify who and what, and that was treated as waiver. United States v. Fluitt, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 9983 (5th Cir. Apr. 24, 2024). Defendant was … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Privileges, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on CA5: Deficient privilege log after records search was waiver

E.D.Pa.: Mandamus doesn’t lie to unseal SW papers

A petition for writ of mandamus doesn’t lie parallel to an action before the USMJ to unseal search warrant materials. Martino v. United States Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Pa., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74349 (E.D. Pa. Apr. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Mandamus doesn’t lie to unseal SW papers

OR: Police listening to attorney-client jail calls because attorney calls not properly segregated leads to dismissal of some counts and setting aside guilty plea

The jail computer controlled phone system did not properly block attorney-client telephone calls, and the police listened to defense counsel’s conversations with defendant in jail. The police then used that information to supersede the indictment. Prejudice is presumed. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Burden of pleading, Prison and jail searches, Privileges, Standing | Comments Off on OR: Police listening to attorney-client jail calls because attorney calls not properly segregated leads to dismissal of some counts and setting aside guilty plea

N.D.Ind.: Motion to suppress was near denial of standing by disavowing relationship with premises

The affidavit showed a substantial basis for concluding that drug evidence would be found in the search of the apartment. [The motion to suppress sought to distance defendant from the place. Came close to being a denial of standing, but … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Motion to suppress was near denial of standing by disavowing relationship with premises

W.D.N.Y.: Def had no standing in a place he wasn’t allowed to be on parole

As a parolee, defendant didn’t show standing in his girlfriend’s apartment when he wasn’t supposed to even be there in violation of parole. United States v. Melvin, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73044 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 22, 2024). The officer showed probable … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def had no standing in a place he wasn’t allowed to be on parole

FL1: Violation of state knock-and-announce statute requires suppression; Hudson not followed

Violation of the state knock-and-announce statute required suppression. Officers entered with haste and didn’t give defendant the chance to surrender peaceably to the search. The statute is a century old, and it serves important privacy interests. The state’s claim that … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Knock and announce, Standing | Comments Off on FL1: Violation of state knock-and-announce statute requires suppression; Hudson not followed

TX2: No SW needed to get IMEI number of an abandoned cell phone to trace the owner

“Officers may open a cell phone abandoned at a crime scene to view non-electronic identifying information, such as the phone’s international mobile equipment identification (IMEI) number, and then use that identifying information to obtain a search warrant for the phone’s … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on TX2: No SW needed to get IMEI number of an abandoned cell phone to trace the owner

N.D.Ohio: Refusing discovery on 4A grounds in forfeiture case results in no standing

On remand from the Sixth Circuit in this forfeiture case on the question of standing, claimant asserted Fourth Amendment privilege to all discovery requests about his standing to claim the money. The court finds no facts for standing means no … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Particularity, School searches, Standing, Strip search | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Refusing discovery on 4A grounds in forfeiture case results in no standing

E.D.Pa.: In a cell phone search, cached data was within the “electronic data or memory features” of the phone as provided by the SW

Cached data on defendant’s cell phone is included in “[a]ll documents, including in electronic form, and stored communications including … photographs, videos, and any other electronic data or other memory features contained in the devices and SIM cards[.]” The search … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: In a cell phone search, cached data was within the “electronic data or memory features” of the phone as provided by the SW

D.N.D.: Defs showed no connection to the premises as overnight guests to have standing

Defendants had no real connection to the place searched to have standing. “There was no evidence presented to support the Defendants’ allegation that they had permission from the owners (Stevens and Levings) to stay in the home as overnight guests. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Standing, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on D.N.D.: Defs showed no connection to the premises as overnight guests to have standing

N.D.Ohio: Being the target of a search doesn’t automatically establish standing

Being the target of a search doesn’t automatically establish standing. There were four packages here sent under assumed names to assumed names. The anticipatory warrant was based on probable cause. United States v. Taylor, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36749 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Being the target of a search doesn’t automatically establish standing

GA: ER GSW patient had no REP in his clothing removed by staff and then given to police

Defendant came to an ER for treatment for a gunshot wound. The medical staff bagged his clothing after getting it off him, and then gave it to the police who requested it. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on GA: ER GSW patient had no REP in his clothing removed by staff and then given to police

D.Nev.: No standing where alleged Turo car rental couldn’t be shown by driver

The court finds defendant lacked standing in a car he claims to have rented through Turo from the owner. The innocent driver of car stolen by someone else could have standing, but he doesn’t even get there. The rental couldn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on D.Nev.: No standing where alleged Turo car rental couldn’t be shown by driver

CA8: Failure to mention CI’s convictions or payments for information wasn’t material

The warrant affiant’s failure to mention the CI was paid or had convictions wasn’t material to change the outcome of the probable cause determination. With CIs, things like that can be assumed. United States v. Riaski, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Staleness, Standing, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA8: Failure to mention CI’s convictions or payments for information wasn’t material

CA8: Affiant officer’s belief that criminals brag about crimes on social media allows cell phone search in a gun case

“We conclude the affidavit adequately established probable cause that Ivey’s cell phone would contain evidence of a firearms offense. Officers found the phone in Ivey’s possession while he was located in a vehicle with a gun under his seat. The … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Affiant officer’s belief that criminals brag about crimes on social media allows cell phone search in a gun case