E.D.La.: ICE SDT to Orleans Parish Sheriff for immigration status of detainees was valid

ICE issued a subpoena to the Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff for information about detainees’ immigration status. After oral argument, the subpoena was narrowed, and it now complies with Morton Salt which “incorporates the Fourth Amendment reasonableness standard that applies to administrative subpoenas.” United States v. Woodfork, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103908 (E.D. La. May 11, 2026).

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s house. A drug dog alerted on his car parked in the curtilage. The search of the car was justified by the dog alert. [And likely would have been under the warrant anyway.] State v. Desarro, 2026-Ohio-1672 (7th Dist. May 7, 2026).*

In a 2255, omission of the homeowner’s name in a search warrant is not a constitutional error that defense counsel should have raised. Besides, it’s not in the record. United States v. Holland, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102835 (W.D. La. May 7, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Dog sniff, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.