Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

TN: Trial court erred in deciding no standing where state didn’t argue that

The trial court decided the suppression issue on lack of standing when the state conceded standing and argued the merits of the search. Reversed for another suppression hearing. State v. Richards, 2023 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 430 (Oct. 23, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Trial court erred in deciding no standing where state didn’t argue that

M.D.Pa.: State law jurisdiction of the officers involved isn’t cognizable in a 2254

State law jurisdiction of the officers involved isn’t cognizable in a 2254. McDowell v. Hainesworth, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187496 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 18, 2023). Petitioner doesn’t get a CoA to appeal his 2255. He provides no basis for concluding … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: State law jurisdiction of the officers involved isn’t cognizable in a 2254

OH: Written inventory not always required to justify it

The failure of officers to make a written inventory doesn’t necessarily constitutionally nullify the inventory. Officer’s testimony about the standardized procedures was sufficient without actually putting the policy into evidence. State v. Toran, 2023-Ohio-3564, 2023 Ohio LEXIS 1957 (Oct. 4, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH: Written inventory not always required to justify it

CA6: Officer’s knowledge of parole search condition irrelevant when there was PC

“Regardless of whether Cosme was aware of the search condition prior to conducting the traffic stop, the district court did not err in denying Marr’s motion to suppress. We thus find it unnecessary to address the broader question of whether … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Officer’s knowledge of parole search condition irrelevant when there was PC

W.D.Va.: Interference with prison mail is 1&14A claim, not 4A

Confiscation or interference with prison legal mail is a First and Fourteenth Amendment claim, not Fourth. Chenevert v. Kanode, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171627 (W.D. Va. Sep. 26, 2023). There was reasonable suspicion for a frisk of the driver of … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Interference with prison mail is 1&14A claim, not 4A

S.D.N.Y.: License plate reading “SOVEREIGN CITIZEN USC ART. SEC. 242.” was RS for stop

License plate reading “SOVEREIGN CITIZEN USC ART. SEC. 242.” was reasonable suspicion for a stop. He admitted he had a gun and the computer check showed he was a convicted felon. United States v. Craft, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170483 … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: License plate reading “SOVEREIGN CITIZEN USC ART. SEC. 242.” was RS for stop

M.D.Fla.: Defense counsel was ineffective for not raising valid suppression issue that would have reduced Guideline range below life

Defense counsel at trial was ineffective for not raising a suppression issue that would likely have prevailed and taken defendant from a life sentence down to a 20 year MM. United States v. Dasinger, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168974 (M.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Defense counsel was ineffective for not raising valid suppression issue that would have reduced Guideline range below life

W.D.Tex.: Right to non-recording and distribution of jail calls to attorneys was clearly established

Plaintiff’s complaint against the jail for recording attorney-client calls and transmitting them to law enforcement and prosecutors stated a claim for relief that was clearly established. Hurdsman v. Gleason, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163081 (W.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2023). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Privileges, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Right to non-recording and distribution of jail calls to attorneys was clearly established

MD: IAC Brady claim fails over search claim

Defense counsel’s failure to seek the IAD file on the officers at a suppression hearing wasn’t ineffective assistance of counsel. The searching officer had an alleged propensity to exaggerate and excessively strip search. Here, however, another officer was there to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Nexus, Strip search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MD: IAC Brady claim fails over search claim

CA3: Def’s possession of rental car with renter’s permission gave standing

“Christopher Montalvo-Flores moved to suppress evidence the Government obtained in its search of his girlfriend’s rental car. The District Court denied his motion, holding that he failed to show he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in that vehicle. We … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: Def’s possession of rental car with renter’s permission gave standing

N.D.Ind.: No IAC where def pled but co-def prevailed on 4A claim

Defendant entered into a beneficial plea agreement and pled to a superseding information and was sentenced. Later, the passenger in his car filed a motion to suppress and prevailed. Still, this was not ineffective assistance of his counsel. “Aside from … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, DNA, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: No IAC where def pled but co-def prevailed on 4A claim

D.Ariz.: No REP in shared folder on computer open on eMule program

The government’s “pre-search” of a shared folder on defendant’s computer available through eMule was not subject to a reasonable expectation of privacy and was reasonable. United States v. Johnson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146664 (D. Ariz. Aug. 21, 2023), adopting … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Computer and cloud searches, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No REP in shared folder on computer open on eMule program

OH5: “Red screen” on patrol car’s computer screen was RS for def’s LPN

A “red screen” on the police car’s computer screen meant a serious warning about defendant’s LPN, and that justified the stop. State v. Cooper, 2023-Ohio-2897, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2881 (5th Dist. Aug. 18, 2023).* Blocking both ends of an … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH5: “Red screen” on patrol car’s computer screen was RS for def’s LPN

ID: Pleading only state constitution waived 4A

Defendant’s pleading only the state constitution waived the Fourth Amendment claim. State v. Bell, 2023 Ida. LEXIS 95 (Aug. 15, 2023). Defendant complained trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging a search of house that was allegedly burglarized and defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Standing, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on ID: Pleading only state constitution waived 4A

D.Minn.: Tracking warrant that provided for tracking but not installation was saved by GFE

The tracking warrant provided for tracking of the car, but did not mention installing the tracker. The court finds the good faith exception applies. United States v. Gonzalez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142057 (D.Minn. Aug. 15, 2023). There was probable … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Tracking warrant that provided for tracking but not installation was saved by GFE

E.D.Mich.: PC to believe a person lives at a particular address can be wrong and still be sufficient

Probable cause to believe a person lives at a particular address can be wrong and still be sufficient. “Vaughn also challenges the sufficiency of the affidavit on the ground that it failed to establish probable cause that he lived at … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: PC to believe a person lives at a particular address can be wrong and still be sufficient

CA11: Outsider to case has no standing in Mar-a-Lago SW litigation to challenge PC

Plaintiff, a citizen who is essentially a person on the street with no particular interest in the case, has no ability to intervene in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant case to argue lack of probable cause, something conceded by the parties. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Outsider to case has no standing in Mar-a-Lago SW litigation to challenge PC

W.D.Tex.: Halfway house tenant has no REP in own cell phone

A resident of a halfway house has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell phone while residing there. He agreed that his property was subject to search. United States v. Weste, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132886 (W.D. Tex. July … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Halfway house tenant has no REP in own cell phone

NY3: Leaving one’s house to do a drug deal and returning is nexus to house

“Contrary to defendant’s contention, the CI’s basis of knowledge was not undermined by the fact that the CI did not actually enter the apartment during the controlled buys …. A sufficient nexus to the apartment was established by the continuous … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY3: Leaving one’s house to do a drug deal and returning is nexus to house

CA10: Civil remedy for violation of Posse Comitatus Act, not exclusion

The remedy for a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act is civil, not exclusion. United States v. King, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 19052 (10th Cir. July 25, 2023) (denying COA). “On the whole, the factors outlined in Chavez provide mixed … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA10: Civil remedy for violation of Posse Comitatus Act, not exclusion