VA: Slight diversion from inventory didn’t show it to be pretextual

The towing of defendant’s car left on the interstate without a valid LPN was reasonable. The officers didn’t have to permit him to find his own sources. The inventory was not proved to be pretextual. “But the departures from procedure on which Stamps relies fail to prove that the inventory search here was pretextual. True, Klepacz started his inventory search without actually writing anything down, searching the passenger compartment and the trunk for about ten minutes before Officer Cheatham appeared with the PD50-6 form. But Klepacz stated aloud the items that he found—information that was contemporaneously recorded by his body camera. And when Officer Cheatham returned with the form, he wrote down the information as Klepacz dictated it to him.” Stamps v. Commonwealth, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 97 (Feb. 18, 2025).

The affidavit for warrant was not so devoid of facts that there wasn’t probable cause or that the good faith exception should apply. “The court disagrees with Mulamba’s argument that this suspicious behavior does not factor into the probable cause determination.” United States v. Milton, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27782 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 23, 2025).*

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop, so defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it. State v. Burson, 2025-Ohio-499 (12th Dist. Feb. 18, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Pretext. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.