Category Archives: Franks doctrine

MA: Defendant fled his allegedly illegal stop, so he can’t argue attenuation when he discarded contraband in flight

The trial court erred in applying the attenuation doctrine here. Defendant claimed he was illegally stopped, but he fled and discarded contraband in flight. Commonwealth v. Diaz, 2025 Mass. LEXIS 300 (June 27, 2025). This geofence warrant was supported by … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Franks doctrine, geofence, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA: Defendant fled his allegedly illegal stop, so he can’t argue attenuation when he discarded contraband in flight

PA: Protective sweep doesn’t permit searching dresser drawers

The protective sweep was valid, but it did not permit going into dresser drawers. Commonwealth v. Hightower, 2025 PA Super 129, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS 277 (June 25, 2025); Commonwealth v. Layer, 2025 PA Super 128, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Protective sweep, Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Protective sweep doesn’t permit searching dresser drawers

W.D.Tex.: Court won’t “second guess” 13 officers participating in vehicle stop and search

“Maybe thirteen officers were not needed. Maybe the officers did not need to carry and display rifles. Maybe fewer vehicles could have been used to block Defendant’s vehicle. Maybe officers did not have to place Defendant in handcuffs because their … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Court won’t “second guess” 13 officers participating in vehicle stop and search

CA6: No property interest shown in blood taken from all infants at birth

The state requiring the taking of some blood from newborn infants for testing and keeping it did not constitute a seizure because plaintiffs proved no property interest. Parental consent is required for any later use. Kanuszewski v. Mich. Dep’t of … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: No property interest shown in blood taken from all infants at birth

S.D.Tex.: Judge shopping SW request noted, and denied again

It appears to this USMJ that the government is judge shopping. After denial of a warrant request, the government reapplied which was first assigned to another USMJ who transferred it here. Rejected again for the same reason. Defect not cured. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Judge shopping SW request noted, and denied again

TX5: Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to warrant

Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to this warrant. He signed it but didn’t acknowledge swearing to it. “the Court of Criminal Appeals has specifically explained that ‘to convey the solemnity and critical … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant papers | Comments Off on TX5: Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to warrant

N.D.Ind.: Pro se def’s post-trial motion to dismiss for 4A issue he didn’t fully appreciate timely is denied

Pro se defendant can’t raise a post-trial Fourth Amendment claim because he didn’t fully understand the FBI 302 discussing the search. “What Defendant is experiencing are the real-world consequences that he was warned of when he elected to proceed pro … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Pro se def’s post-trial motion to dismiss for 4A issue he didn’t fully appreciate timely is denied

GA: SW affidavit came in at trial; argument waived

Defendant’s argument about admission of a search warrant affidavit at trial was deemed abandoned even for plain error review. Coston v. State, 2025 Ga. LEXIS 123 (June 10, 2025).* (Caution readers: I had this issue just this year: The prosecution … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: SW affidavit came in at trial; argument waived

S.D.W.Va.: Paying “rent” in drugs is a business transaction didn’t give a REP here

Paying daily “rent” in drugs is a business transaction without standing. “Although Jackson was an overnight guest insofar as he slept on the couch in the living room, he told law enforcement officers in his interview that he paid McCallister … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Paying “rent” in drugs is a business transaction didn’t give a REP here

S.D.Tex.: If you’re moving to suppress, at least say what is to be suppressed

Defendant moves to suppress without saying what it is that should be suppressed. [So why not just find it moot?] Defendant raises a Franks challenge and a lack of probable cause. He doesn’t prevail on either. United States v. Alhemoud, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: If you’re moving to suppress, at least say what is to be suppressed

D.Or.: Search of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not 4A

Reading a prisoner’s legal mail may violate the First Amendment, but he can’t show that it violated the Fourth Amendment because there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in prison and nothing interfered with his cases. Lewis v. Conway, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Or.: Search of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not 4A

D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

Defendant’s Franks motion fails because the government can justify a warrantless search of the vehicle under the automobile exception. United States v. Childs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101370 (D.N.J. May 28, 2025). Plaintiff’s false arrest claim isn’t barred by Heck, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

S.D.Cal.: FinCEN’s SWB GTO for financial reporting enjoined for APA reasons; 4A not reached yet

FinCEN’s Southwest Border Geographic Targeting Order (SWB GTO) for enhanced reporting requirements in certain zip codes appears to have been adopted without proper authority under the Administrative Procedure Act. The Fourth Amendment claim is deferred until later as unnecessary at … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: FinCEN’s SWB GTO for financial reporting enjoined for APA reasons; 4A not reached yet

MT: No RS for continued stop, but def consented to it

The officer’s observation of “a driver’s nervousness, an unspecified prior history of drug use, and the officer’s assertion that the driver failed to pull over quickly enough do not alone combine to show particularized suspicion of illegal drug activity.” Nevertheless, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MT: No RS for continued stop, but def consented to it

D.Neb.: The fact of omissions from the affidavit for warrant that might have made it less incriminating doesn’t help any here; there was PC and evidence to be found

The fact the omissions from the warrant application might make it appear less incriminating doesn’t help here; the warrant was based on jail calls and pointed to evidence in defendant’s safe. That’s not a Franks violation. United States v. Wright, … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Franks doctrine, Knock and talk | Comments Off on D.Neb.: The fact of omissions from the affidavit for warrant that might have made it less incriminating doesn’t help any here; there was PC and evidence to be found

TX8: Motorcycle parked on driveway closer to road than house wasn’t on curtilage

Officers didn’t enter the curtilage to look at defendant’s motorcycle. It was parked on dirt strip driveway closer to the street than the house, all confirmed by bodycam. Groh v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 3572 (Tex. App. – El … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX8: Motorcycle parked on driveway closer to road than house wasn’t on curtilage

S.D.Ind.: No REP in ALPR tracking; not as intrusive as GPS

Tracking defendant’s vehicle with automatic license plate readers can’t be equated with GPS placement, so Jones distinguished. There’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in an LPN. There is also interesting Franks and staleness issues. Defendant got a Franks hearing but … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: No REP in ALPR tracking; not as intrusive as GPS

PA: No REP in data on use of EBT card

Appellant’s argument that the search incident failed because of a lack of an arrest warrant wasn’t presented below so it’s waived. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the data on his EBT card that Wawa wouldn’t turn over … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on PA: No REP in data on use of EBT card

TX5: Warrantless removal of GSR was reasonable

Warrantless swabbing for GSR from defendant’s hands was reasonable because of exigency because it could likely be immediately lost. Argumedo v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 3375 (Tex. App. – Dallas May 16, 2025). Defendant’s Franks claim is more like … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on TX5: Warrantless removal of GSR was reasonable

S.D.N.Y.: Collective knowledge doctrine in CA2 only applies to warrantless searches, not a Franks challenge

Defendant’s Franks claim fails. The omitted allegedly exculpatory evidence either wasn’t material to the probable cause finding or wasn’t known by law enforcement at the time the warrant issued. In this circuit, the collective knowledge doctrine applies to warrantless searches, … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Collective knowledge doctrine in CA2 only applies to warrantless searches, not a Franks challenge